Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

19144

in Philadelphia, PennsylvaniaPopulation 50,580

36.75/ 100

Ranked #28,649 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 10.7%)

Ranked #1,651 of 1,748 Pennsylvania ZIPs (bottom 5.6%)

Ranked #332 of 361 Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington, PA-NJ-DE-MD ZIPs (bottom 8.1%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Some domains have limited local data — read this Score as directional

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Households without a vehicle

30.5%

in the top 2.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The share of households with no vehicle available.

Full methodology ›

Short sleep

44.9%

in the top 3.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.

Full methodology ›

Child-care access

0.94 per 1,000 residents

in the top 2.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST98th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The number of child day-care services inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Subsidized affordable housing

678 units

in the top 2.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The number of affordable rental units in this ZIP supported by the federal Low-Income Housing Tax Credit program.

Full methodology ›

Transit access

5.6 per 1,000 residents

in the top 4.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST93rd
US96th
Definition & source ›

The number of public-transit stops inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Homeownership rate

37.2%

in the bottom 4.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST3rd
US5th
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes that are owned, rather than rented, by the people living in them.

Full methodology ›

Walkability

160 intersections/sq mi

in the top 4.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST92nd
US95th
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

Housing-cost burden

42.9%

in the top 7.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.

Full methodology ›

Park land

16.1%

in the top 8.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST93rd
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area that is public parkland.

Full methodology ›

Unemployment rate

10.1%

in the top 9.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US91st
Definition & source ›

The share of the civilian labor force that is unemployed.

Full methodology ›

The read

From what the available data documents, ZIP 19144, one of several in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania lands in the bottom 10.7% nationally (28,649th) and the bottom 5.6% of Pennsylvania (1,651st), based on limited data; treat as directional.

continue reading

On the partial data in hand, the profile shows what it can: childcare sits in the top 2.7% nationally, subsidized affordable housing settles in the top 2.9% nationally, and transit registers in the top 4.1% nationally. Walkability stands in the top 4.7% nationally, and park land lands in the top 8.4% nationally. Set against that, households without a vehicle is in the top 2.3% nationally, and modeled short sleep resides in the top 3.2% nationally. Homeownership rests in the bottom 4.6% nationally, and housing-cost burden lies in the top 7.1% nationally. Unemployment sits in the top 9.3% nationally.

Relative to the ZIPs around it, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In plain terms, subsidized affordable housing is the main federal tax-credit program (HUD) funding affordable rental housing, counted as local units it supports. The nearest healthier ZIP overall is ZIP 19119, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington, PA-NJ-DE-MD metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Preventive CarePartial

healthier than 66%

15%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 88%

6%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 92%

6%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 29%

19%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 28%

16%

Not placed: Chronic Disease Burden and Risk Behavior — too little of each is measured here to compare reliably. They still count toward the score (together 38% of it); we just will not publish a standing we cannot stand behind.

No data: Mental Health and Disability — not measured in this ZIP, so it is left out of the score entirely rather than estimated.

Lifting this score

Preventive CarePartial

healthier than 64%

15%

Climate / Disaster Risk

in the top 0.00%

6%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 96%

6%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 10%

19%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 34%

16%

Not placed: Chronic Disease Burden and Risk Behavior — too little of each is measured here to compare reliably. They still count toward the score (together 38% of it); we just will not publish a standing we cannot stand behind.

No data: Mental Health and Disability — not measured in this ZIP, so it is left out of the score entirely rather than estimated.

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

2 of our published findings list this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Below what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 74.4 ± 1.0 years. A median household income of $53,161 predicts 77.6 years — 3.2 years below.

    Ranked #4,302 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

  • Below its nearby ZIPs

    The ZIP codes that outlive their neighbors

    Estimated life expectancy is 74.4 ± 1.0 years. The 48 nearest ZIP codes with estimates average 77.8 years — 3.4 years below them.

    Ranked #2,648 of the 3,687 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above the nearby-ZIP average, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years23.1%19.8–26.6
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years67.4%63.5–71.1
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults54.6%51.4–57.7
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years80.8%75.7–85.4
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Short sleep duration among adults44.9%40.9–48.9
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)PA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate24.2%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.3% (2.1–21.6%) n=1,759
Uninsured 18–647.6%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2866.3% (0.0–16.6%) n=1,753
No HS diploma (25+)8.9%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5057.0% (1.5–16.1%) n=1,762
Bachelor's or higher (25+)36.7%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50521.9% (8.9–50.4%) n=1,762
Unemployment rate (16+)10.1%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.9% (0.0–9.6%) n=1,755
Households without a vehicle30.5%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.8% (0.0–15.6%) n=1,758
Broadband subscription86.3%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.2% (75.7–97.3%) n=1,758
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)42.9%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.9% (9.9–35.3%) n=1,758
Homeownership rate37.2%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32280.1% (57.1–94.5%) n=1,758
Crowded housing (>1 per room)3.7%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.6% (0.0–3.3%) n=1,758
Foreign-born population5.4%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.4% (0.0–10.2%) n=1,763
Single-parent households32.6%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08756.3% (38.5–72.8%) n=1,744
Population 65+15.1%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55321.1% (12.3–31.4%) n=1,763
Median age34.7 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29244.2 yr (33.9–55.5) n=1,752
Median household income$53,161$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$71,250 ($50,880–$112,747) n=1,642
Median home value$238,700$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$197,200 ($99,000–$382,120) n=1,649
Median gross rent$1,153$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$983 ($701–$1,527) n=1,367
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)PA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth74.4 yr ± 0.5278.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30879.2 yr (76.0–82.0) n=1,730

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.52 years of 74.4, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured