Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

14782

in Sinclairville, New YorkPopulation 2,099

53.01/ 100

Ranked #12,071 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 38%)

Ranked #1,228 of 1,730 New York ZIPs (bottom 29%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Broad coverage across health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Natural-disaster risk

in the bottom 9.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST20th
US9th
Definition & source ›

This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.

Full methodology ›

Fatal road crashes

28.6 per 100,000 residents per year

in the top 14.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US85th
Definition & source ›

The annual rate of fatal road crashes per 100,000 residents, pooled over a ten-year window.

A rate per resident population. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the rate to be reliable — about 30% of US ZIPs — no value is published rather than an unstable one; those ZIPs are absent from this comparison, not counted as crash-free.

Full methodology ›

Radon

2.5 pCi/L

in the top 20% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US80th
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

The read

On the composite measure, Sinclairville, New York (ZIP 14782) stands in the top 38% healthiest ZIPs nationally (12,071st) and the bottom 29% of New York (1,228th), based on limited data; treat as directional.

continue reading

The strongest marks in the data are worth naming first: modeled disaster risk registers in the bottom 9.4% nationally. Modeled extreme heat lies at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs. Distance to a nursing home is at the national minimum, shared with about 27% of ZIPs. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility registers in the top 14.6% nationally, modeled humid heat lies in the bottom 16% nationally, and modeled mammography is in the top 16% nationally. On the other side, fatal road crashes registers in the top 14.7% nationally, and walkability lies in the bottom 18% nationally. Recreation is at the national minimum, shared with about 35% of ZIPs. Modeled pfas registers in the top 19% nationally.

For clarity, disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is a plant handling large amounts of hazardous chemicals that must file an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases. Pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. ZIP 14712, just across the boundary, ranks better overall among the ZIPs nearby.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 60%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 85%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 61%

8%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 97%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 43%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 41%

16%

Disability

healthier than 55%

7%

Holding it back

Risk Behavior

healthier than 33%

11%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 38%

5%

Lifting this score

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 99%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 55%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 48%

13%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 17%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 36%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 23%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 18%

8%

Disability

healthier than 24%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 31%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults31.0%27.5–34.4
High blood pressure among adults37.0%32.8–41.1
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.0%9.0–11.0
Current asthma among adults11.5%10.2–12.9
Coronary heart disease among adults7.4%6.7–8.3
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults8.7%7.7–9.8
Depression among adults21.3%18.0–24.7
Diagnosed diabetes among adults11.9%10.3–13.7
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened39.0%34.7–43.4
Obesity among adults36.1%29.3–43.2
Stroke among adults3.9%3.5–4.2
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years13.2%10.7–16.0
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years5.8%4.8–7.0
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure78.8%75.8–81.5
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults81.6%78.2–84.4
Cholesterol screening among adults89.2%87.7–90.6
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years69.4%64.9–73.8
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults62.7%59.3–66.2
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years79.2%72.6–84.8
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults16.9%13.9–20.1
Current cigarette smoking among adults15.4%13.4–18.0
No leisure-time physical activity among adults26.4%22.3–30.9
Short sleep duration among adults38.6%32.8–44.8
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults19.1%16.7–21.9
Frequent mental distress among adults16.9%14.9–18.9
Frequent physical distress among adults15.2%13.4–17.2
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults13.7%12.1–15.5
Any disability among adults29.6%25.8–33.8
Hearing disability among adults7.0%6.2–7.8
Independent living disability among adults8.8%7.8–9.9
Mobility disability among adults15.1%13.2–17.4
Self-care disability among adults4.2%3.8–4.7
Vision disability among adults5.0%4.5–5.6
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults22.9%19.5–26.6
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults14.1%11.8–16.7
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults13.5%11.4–16.0
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults11.9%10.0–13.9
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults7.7%6.7–8.8
Loneliness among adults30.8%26.1–35.9
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults7.5%6.4–8.7
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NY median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate10.7%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.5% (2.5–22.6%) n=1,734
Uninsured 18–645.3%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2865.0% (0.0–13.1%) n=1,734
No HS diploma (25+)6.4%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5057.1% (1.2–17.5%) n=1,743
Bachelor's or higher (25+)24.5%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50531.8% (13.9–62.1%) n=1,743
Unemployment rate (16+)1.8%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.4% (0.0–9.7%) n=1,730
Households without a vehicle5.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3225.7% (0.0–28.9%) n=1,730
Broadband subscription87.0%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32291.5% (81.1–98.3%) n=1,730
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)20.0%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32227.2% (14.2–45.5%) n=1,730
Homeownership rate81.0%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32280.2% (40.9–94.8%) n=1,730
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.8%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.0% (0.0–6.6%) n=1,730
Foreign-born population1.3%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5534.8% (0.0–28.7%) n=1,746
Single-parent households68.4%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08754.0% (36.7–74.5%) n=1,716
Population 65+25.2%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.0% (12.0–33.2%) n=1,746
Median age48.5 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.5 yr (34.6–56.1) n=1,733
Median household income$71,250$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$81,837 ($55,470–$145,610) n=1,626
Median home value$121,200$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$247,700 ($121,180–$801,380) n=1,629
Median gross rent$725$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,162 ($782–$2,359) n=1,367
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NY median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth78.3 yr ± 0.7878.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.9 yr (78.0–84.5) n=1,692

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.78 years of 78.3, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured