Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

14537

in Port Gibson, New YorkPopulation 210

52.31/ 100

Ranked #13,030 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 41%)

Ranked #1,280 of 1,730 New York ZIPs (bottom 26%)

Ranked #72 of 101 Rochester, NY ZIPs (bottom 29%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Broad coverage across health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Poverty rate

0.00%

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The share of residents whose income is below the federal poverty line, from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey.

Full methodology ›

Homeownership rate

100%

at the national maximum

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes that are owned, rather than rented, by the people living in them.

Full methodology ›

Home broadband subscription

100%

at the national maximum

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.

Full methodology ›

Expected annual disaster loss

$0

in the bottom 3.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST4th
US4th
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

Natural-disaster risk

in the bottom 3.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST7th
US4th
Definition & source ›

This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.

Full methodology ›

The read

Port Gibson, New York (ZIP 14537), in overall standing, comes out in the top 41% healthiest ZIPs nationally (13,030th) and the bottom 26% of New York (1,280th), based on limited data; treat as directional.

continue reading

A balanced showing across the data, with a few readings each side: poverty sits at the national minimum, homeownership stands at the national maximum, and home broadband subscription resides at the national maximum. Modeled expected annual loss sits in the bottom 3.7% nationally, and disaster risk stands in the bottom 3.9% nationally. Unemployment resides at the national minimum, shared with about 15% of ZIPs. Households without a vehicle sits at the national minimum, shared with about 16% of ZIPs. Modeled extreme heat stands at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs. Modeled loud transportation noise resides at the national minimum, shared with about 22% of ZIPs. On the other hand, modeled pfas sits in the top 10.1% nationally.

Set within its surrounding area, park land runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Defined simply, for reference, expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. Disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. Pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. The closest healthier ZIP overall is ZIP 14522, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Rochester, NY metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 65%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 80%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 87%

13%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 78%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 60%

5%

About typical

Risk Behavior

healthier than 42%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 55%

8%

Disability

healthier than 43%

7%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 29%

21%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 86%

14%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 60%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 53%

13%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 46%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 50%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 8%

21%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 31%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 14%

8%

Disability

healthier than 14%

7%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 76%

14%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 49%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 55%

13%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 42%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 41%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 9%

21%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 35%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 39%

8%

Disability

healthier than 17%

7%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults34.3%30.2–38.5
High blood pressure among adults38.2%33.7–42.9
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults11.1%9.9–12.3
Current asthma among adults11.8%10.2–13.5
Coronary heart disease among adults8.4%7.2–9.8
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults9.5%7.5–11.8
Depression among adults22.2%18.5–26.0
Diagnosed diabetes among adults12.5%10.5–14.7
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened40.0%35.4–44.5
Obesity among adults33.2%26.2–40.8
Stroke among adults4.3%3.6–5.0
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years16.7%13.8–20.0
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years5.8%3.9–8.1
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure80.0%76.7–82.9
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults82.2%78.9–85.0
Cholesterol screening among adults90.7%88.7–92.4
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years70.3%65.8–74.7
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults62.7%59.2–66.2
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years77.2%69.7–83.7
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults15.1%12.4–18.0
Current cigarette smoking among adults15.7%12.0–19.8
No leisure-time physical activity among adults26.5%21.0–32.8
Short sleep duration among adults38.8%32.6–45.3
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults20.2%16.0–25.2
Frequent mental distress among adults16.9%14.4–19.6
Frequent physical distress among adults16.2%13.4–19.1
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults13.9%11.4–16.9
Any disability among adults31.7%26.2–37.6
Hearing disability among adults7.9%6.7–9.1
Independent living disability among adults9.3%7.5–11.4
Mobility disability among adults16.7%13.4–20.6
Self-care disability among adults4.7%3.7–5.8
Vision disability among adults5.3%4.3–6.5
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults22.8%18.8–27.1
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults13.6%9.7–17.9
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults12.7%8.9–16.8
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults11.5%8.8–14.3
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults7.3%5.8–8.9
Loneliness among adults33.7%28.5–39.2
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults6.8%5.3–8.2
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NY median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate0.0%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.5% (2.5–22.6%) n=1,734
Uninsured 18–640.0%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2865.0% (0.0–13.1%) n=1,734
No HS diploma (25+)22.0%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5057.1% (1.2–17.5%) n=1,743
Bachelor's or higher (25+)11.3%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50531.8% (13.9–62.1%) n=1,743
Unemployment rate (16+)0.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.4% (0.0–9.7%) n=1,730
Households without a vehicle0.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3225.7% (0.0–28.9%) n=1,730
Broadband subscription100.0%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32291.5% (81.1–98.3%) n=1,730
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)31.5%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32227.2% (14.2–45.5%) n=1,730
Homeownership rate100.0%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32280.2% (40.9–94.8%) n=1,730
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.0% (0.0–6.6%) n=1,730
Foreign-born population10.5%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5534.8% (0.0–28.7%) n=1,746
Single-parent households100.0%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08754.0% (36.7–74.5%) n=1,716
Population 65+21.9%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.0% (12.0–33.2%) n=1,746
Median age49.1 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.5 yr (34.6–56.1) n=1,733
Median household income$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$81,837 ($55,470–$145,610) n=1,626
Median home value$157,200$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$247,700 ($121,180–$801,380) n=1,629
Median gross rent$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,162 ($782–$2,359) n=1,367
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NY median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth79.1 yr ± 1.3378.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.9 yr (78.0–84.5) n=1,692

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.33 years of 79.1, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured