Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

14213

in Buffalo, New YorkPopulation 24,107

50.13/ 100

Ranked #16,058 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 50%)

Ranked #1,434 of 1,730 New York ZIPs (bottom 17%)

Ranked #69 of 86 Buffalo-Cheektowaga, NY ZIPs (bottom 20%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Households without a vehicle

25.7%

in the top 3.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST89th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The share of households with no vehicle available.

Full methodology ›

Walkability

160 intersections/sq mi

in the top 4.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST87th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

Tree cover

0.00%

at the national minimum

Higher is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.

Full methodology ›

Radon

0.3 pCi/L

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

Homeownership rate

39.5%

in the bottom 5.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST10th
US5th
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes that are owned, rather than rented, by the people living in them.

Full methodology ›

Transit access

4.8 per 1,000 residents

in the top 5.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST94th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The number of public-transit stops inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Hearing disability

4.7%

in the bottom 4.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST10th
US4th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.

Full methodology ›

High cholesterol

31.3%

in the bottom 5.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST4th
US5th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.

Full methodology ›

Housing insecurity

21.3%

in the top 7.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced housing insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Short sleep

42.5%

in the top 7.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.

Full methodology ›

The read

ZIP 14213, one of several in Buffalo, New York, on the composite measure, lands in the bottom 50% nationally (16,058th) and the bottom 17% of New York (1,434th).

continue reading

The profile cuts both ways, and the readings bear that out: walkability lands in the top 4.8% nationally, modeled radon resides at the national minimum, and transit lies in the top 5.4% nationally. Modeled hearing disability settles in the bottom 4.5% nationally, and high cholesterol stands in the bottom 5.1% nationally. Working the other way, households without a vehicle is in the top 3.1% nationally, and modeled tree cover rests at the national minimum. Homeownership sits in the bottom 5.2% nationally, and modeled housing insecurity registers in the top 7.3% nationally. Modeled short sleep lands in the top 7.8% nationally.

Set against the neighboring ZIPs, park land runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In everyday language, radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. A healthier neighbor overall sits at ZIP 14222, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Buffalo-Cheektowaga, NY metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 81%

21%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 84%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 85%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 55%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 44%

8%

Disability

healthier than 50%

7%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 9%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 20%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 12%

11%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 66%

21%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 80%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 47%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 59%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 8%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 5%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 8%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 8%

8%

Disability

healthier than 19%

7%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 87%

21%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 80%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 45%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 44%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 11%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 5%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 19%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 16%

8%

Disability

healthier than 20%

7%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

2 of our published findings list this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Below what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 74.4 ± 1.2 years. A median household income of $53,870 predicts 77.6 years — 3.2 years below.

    Ranked #4,401 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

  • Below its nearby ZIPs

    The ZIP codes that outlive their neighbors

    Estimated life expectancy is 74.4 ± 1.2 years. The 45 nearest ZIP codes with estimates average 77.7 years — 3.3 years below them.

    Ranked #2,560 of the 3,687 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above the nearby-ZIP average, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults20.2%18.1–22.2
High blood pressure among adults28.4%25.6–31.0
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults4.6%4.2–5.1
Current asthma among adults11.9%10.5–13.2
Coronary heart disease among adults5.0%4.5–5.5
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults6.3%5.6–6.9
Depression among adults21.0%18.3–23.6
Diagnosed diabetes among adults10.7%9.4–12.0
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened31.3%28.4–34.1
Obesity among adults35.5%31.2–39.7
Stroke among adults3.0%2.7–3.2
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years19.9%17.0–23.0
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years10.8%9.3–12.5
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure70.5%67.6–73.2
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults79.3%76.3–82.0
Cholesterol screening among adults82.9%80.9–84.8
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years59.3%55.4–63.1
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults52.0%49.1–54.8
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years77.0%71.6–81.7
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults17.7%15.2–20.5
Current cigarette smoking among adults15.0%13.2–16.9
No leisure-time physical activity among adults30.1%26.8–33.4
Short sleep duration among adults42.5%38.7–46.4
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults22.1%19.8–24.4
Frequent mental distress among adults19.0%17.1–21.0
Frequent physical distress among adults13.7%12.2–15.2
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults15.7%14.1–17.4
Any disability among adults27.4%24.4–30.4
Hearing disability among adults4.7%4.2–5.3
Independent living disability among adults10.1%9.1–11.2
Mobility disability among adults12.5%11.1–14.0
Self-care disability among adults4.6%4.2–5.0
Vision disability among adults6.9%6.3–7.4
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults27.7%24.4–31.2
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults26.2%23.4–29.2
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults25.0%22.5–27.8
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults21.3%18.9–23.9
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults14.0%12.5–15.6
Loneliness among adults35.0%31.0–39.1
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults14.0%12.3–15.7
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NY median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate24.5%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.5% (2.5–22.6%) n=1,734
Uninsured 18–643.7%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2865.0% (0.0–13.1%) n=1,734
No HS diploma (25+)18.4%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5057.1% (1.2–17.5%) n=1,743
Bachelor's or higher (25+)35.3%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50531.8% (13.9–62.1%) n=1,743
Unemployment rate (16+)6.7%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.4% (0.0–9.7%) n=1,730
Households without a vehicle25.7%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3225.7% (0.0–28.9%) n=1,730
Broadband subscription94.3%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32291.5% (81.1–98.3%) n=1,730
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)36.4%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32227.2% (14.2–45.5%) n=1,730
Homeownership rate39.5%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32280.2% (40.9–94.8%) n=1,730
Crowded housing (>1 per room)2.5%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.0% (0.0–6.6%) n=1,730
Foreign-born population16.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5534.8% (0.0–28.7%) n=1,746
Single-parent households37.2%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08754.0% (36.7–74.5%) n=1,716
Population 65+9.3%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.0% (12.0–33.2%) n=1,746
Median age31.1 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.5 yr (34.6–56.1) n=1,733
Median household income$53,870$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$81,837 ($55,470–$145,610) n=1,626
Median home value$211,200$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$247,700 ($121,180–$801,380) n=1,629
Median gross rent$1,100$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,162 ($782–$2,359) n=1,367
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NY median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth74.4 yr ± 0.6178.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.9 yr (78.0–84.5) n=1,692

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.61 years of 74.4, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured