Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

14105

in Middleport, New YorkPopulation 5,313

55.39/ 100

Ranked #8,984 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 28%)

Ranked #994 of 1,730 New York ZIPs (bottom 43%)

Ranked #57 of 86 Buffalo-Cheektowaga, NY ZIPs (bottom 34%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Broad coverage across health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Arsenic in groundwater

14.6%

in the top 10.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US90th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Housing-cost burden

13.9%

in the bottom 16% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST10th
US16th
Definition & source ›

The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.

Full methodology ›

The read

Middleport, New York (ZIP 14105), in overall standing, comes out in the top 28% healthiest ZIPs nationally (8,984th) and the bottom 43% of New York (994th), based on limited data; treat as directional.

continue reading

A healthy showing across the board, and a few measures carry it: poverty is in the bottom 12.6% nationally, housing-cost burden lies in the bottom 16% nationally, and modeled disaster risk registers in the bottom 17% nationally. Modeled hearing disability is in the bottom 19% nationally, uninsured lies in the bottom 10.8% nationally, and extreme heat registers in the bottom 20% nationally. Modeled humid heat is in the bottom 22% nationally. On the other hand, modeled arsenic lies in the top 10.4% nationally. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility registers at the national minimum, shared with about 31% of ZIPs. Walkability is in the bottom 22% nationally.

Defined simply, for reference, arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is a plant handling large amounts of hazardous chemicals that must file an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases. Disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. The closest healthier ZIP overall is ZIP 14001, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Buffalo-Cheektowaga, NY metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 78%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 77%

13%

Disability

healthier than 69%

7%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 94%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 61%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 57%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 51%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 40%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 58%

8%

Nothing measured is holding this score back.

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 83%

14%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 94%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 45%

16%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 50%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 32%

21%

Preventive Care

healthier than 35%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 29%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 16%

8%

Disability

healthier than 40%

7%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 83%

14%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 76%

5%

About typical

Healthcare Access

healthier than 47%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 37%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 31%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 27%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 35%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 30%

8%

Disability

healthier than 36%

7%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults28.4%25.6–31.7
High blood pressure among adults35.6%32.1–39.6
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.6%8.8–10.5
Current asthma among adults11.5%10.3–12.9
Coronary heart disease among adults6.6%5.9–7.3
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults7.7%6.7–8.8
Depression among adults21.9%19.1–25.4
Diagnosed diabetes among adults10.5%9.2–12.1
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened36.1%32.6–40.3
Obesity among adults38.6%32.8–45.4
Stroke among adults3.5%3.1–3.8
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years11.1%9.2–13.2
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years5.6%4.6–6.7
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure77.2%74.4–80.0
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults81.7%78.9–84.5
Cholesterol screening among adults89.1%87.8–90.6
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years68.3%64.0–72.5
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults63.4%60.2–66.5
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years75.8%69.2–81.6
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults17.1%14.5–20.2
Current cigarette smoking among adults14.6%12.3–17.1
No leisure-time physical activity among adults25.8%22.0–30.2
Short sleep duration among adults37.5%32.3–42.8
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults17.8%15.3–20.5
Frequent mental distress among adults16.8%15.0–18.9
Frequent physical distress among adults14.5%12.8–16.4
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults13.1%11.5–14.9
Any disability among adults27.8%24.2–31.7
Hearing disability among adults6.2%5.6–7.0
Independent living disability among adults8.1%7.1–9.3
Mobility disability among adults13.8%12.0–15.8
Self-care disability among adults3.7%3.3–4.2
Vision disability among adults4.4%4.0–5.0
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults23.1%19.9–26.5
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults12.7%10.7–14.9
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults11.6%9.7–13.6
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults11.1%9.6–12.8
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults7.1%6.2–8.1
Loneliness among adults30.6%26.4–35.1
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults6.7%5.8–7.7
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NY median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate3.7%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.5% (2.5–22.6%) n=1,734
Uninsured 18–646.9%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2865.0% (0.0–13.1%) n=1,734
No HS diploma (25+)9.0%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5057.1% (1.2–17.5%) n=1,743
Bachelor's or higher (25+)18.0%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50531.8% (13.9–62.1%) n=1,743
Unemployment rate (16+)3.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.4% (0.0–9.7%) n=1,730
Households without a vehicle5.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3225.7% (0.0–28.9%) n=1,730
Broadband subscription87.5%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32291.5% (81.1–98.3%) n=1,730
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)13.9%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32227.2% (14.2–45.5%) n=1,730
Homeownership rate77.8%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32280.2% (40.9–94.8%) n=1,730
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.9%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.0% (0.0–6.6%) n=1,730
Foreign-born population0.4%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5534.8% (0.0–28.7%) n=1,746
Single-parent households59.0%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08754.0% (36.7–74.5%) n=1,716
Population 65+22.8%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.0% (12.0–33.2%) n=1,746
Median age46.6 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.5 yr (34.6–56.1) n=1,733
Median household income$92,405$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$81,837 ($55,470–$145,610) n=1,626
Median home value$168,400$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$247,700 ($121,180–$801,380) n=1,629
Median gross rent$794$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,162 ($782–$2,359) n=1,367
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NY median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth78.7 yr ± 0.9678.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.9 yr (78.0–84.5) n=1,692

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.96 years of 78.7, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured