Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

14098

in Lyndonville, New YorkPopulation 2,707

49.28/ 100

Ranked #17,270 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 46%)

Ranked #1,487 of 1,730 New York ZIPs (bottom 14.1%)

Ranked #83 of 101 Rochester, NY ZIPs (bottom 18%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Fatal road crashes

0 per 100,000 residents per year

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The annual rate of fatal road crashes per 100,000 residents, pooled over a ten-year window.

A rate per resident population. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the rate to be reliable — about 30% of US ZIPs — no value is published rather than an unstable one; those ZIPs are absent from this comparison, not counted as crash-free.

Full methodology ›

Arsenic in groundwater

25.5%

in the top 4.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Home broadband subscription

77.8%

in the bottom 13.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST7th
US13th
Definition & source ›

The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.

Full methodology ›

The read

Overall, Lyndonville, New York (ZIP 14098) lands in the bottom 46% nationally (17,270th) and the bottom 14.1% of New York (1,487th).

continue reading

The picture here is genuinely mixed, with readings on both sides: fatal road crashes lies at the national minimum. Modeled loud transportation noise lands at the national minimum, shared with about 22% of ZIPs. Modeled disaster risk sits in the bottom 13.1% nationally. Crowded housing is at the national minimum, shared with about 29% of ZIPs. Recreation settles in the top 18% nationally, and modeled humid heat resides in the bottom 19% nationally. On the other side, modeled arsenic registers in the top 4.3% nationally, households without a vehicle rests in the top 10.2% nationally, and home broadband subscription stands in the bottom 13.3% nationally. Outer-floodplain exposure lies in the top 18% nationally.

A note on the terms: arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. Loud transportation noise is the modeled share of an area exposed to road, rail, and air noise at or above 65 decibels, near conversation volume. For a healthier nearby comparison, ZIP 14012, just across the boundary, ranks better overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Rochester, NY metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 77%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 79%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 43%

21%

Preventive Care

healthier than 56%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 50%

8%

Disability

healthier than 42%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 42%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 21%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 22%

11%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 82%

14%

About typical

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 48%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 17%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 19%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 19%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 14%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 11%

8%

Disability

healthier than 13%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 34%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 73%

14%

About typical

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 45%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 12%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 27%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 29%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 24%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 33%

8%

Disability

healthier than 16%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 20%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults30.2%26.7–33.9
High blood pressure among adults36.1%31.9–40.5
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.3%8.4–10.2
Current asthma among adults11.7%10.4–13.3
Coronary heart disease among adults7.8%6.8–8.8
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults9.4%8.1–11.0
Depression among adults21.6%18.4–25.2
Diagnosed diabetes among adults12.1%10.4–14.1
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened38.3%33.9–42.8
Obesity among adults33.8%26.4–41.9
Stroke among adults4.0%3.6–4.5
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years15.2%12.4–18.2
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years7.2%5.7–9.0
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure77.2%74.1–80.1
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults79.9%76.5–82.9
Cholesterol screening among adults87.6%85.7–89.3
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years66.5%61.5–71.2
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults56.5%52.8–60.1
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years75.6%67.8–82.1
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults16.8%14.0–20.0
Current cigarette smoking among adults17.5%14.7–20.8
No leisure-time physical activity among adults29.1%24.2–34.7
Short sleep duration among adults37.9%31.1–44.7
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults21.4%18.3–25.2
Frequent mental distress among adults17.9%15.8–20.3
Frequent physical distress among adults15.9%13.9–18.3
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults15.0%13.0–17.3
Any disability among adults31.3%26.8–36.5
Hearing disability among adults7.2%6.3–8.2
Independent living disability among adults9.7%8.4–11.2
Mobility disability among adults16.1%13.7–18.8
Self-care disability among adults4.7%4.1–5.4
Vision disability among adults5.6%5.0–6.5
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults24.6%20.9–28.5
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults16.9%14.0–20.0
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults16.1%13.4–18.9
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults13.2%11.2–15.4
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults8.8%7.6–10.1
Loneliness among adults32.7%27.6–38.0
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults8.3%7.1–9.6
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NY median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate17.7%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.5% (2.5–22.6%) n=1,734
Uninsured 18–6414.1%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2865.0% (0.0–13.1%) n=1,734
No HS diploma (25+)14.2%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5057.1% (1.2–17.5%) n=1,743
Bachelor's or higher (25+)19.7%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50531.8% (13.9–62.1%) n=1,743
Unemployment rate (16+)1.2%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.4% (0.0–9.7%) n=1,730
Households without a vehicle12.5%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3225.7% (0.0–28.9%) n=1,730
Broadband subscription77.8%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32291.5% (81.1–98.3%) n=1,730
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)22.1%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32227.2% (14.2–45.5%) n=1,730
Homeownership rate83.4%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32280.2% (40.9–94.8%) n=1,730
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.0% (0.0–6.6%) n=1,730
Foreign-born population3.3%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5534.8% (0.0–28.7%) n=1,746
Single-parent households54.8%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08754.0% (36.7–74.5%) n=1,716
Population 65+17.3%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.0% (12.0–33.2%) n=1,746
Median age39.0 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.5 yr (34.6–56.1) n=1,733
Median household income$91,042$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$81,837 ($55,470–$145,610) n=1,626
Median home value$136,700$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$247,700 ($121,180–$801,380) n=1,629
Median gross rent$932$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,162 ($782–$2,359) n=1,367
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NY median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth79.0 yr ± 0.8878.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.9 yr (78.0–84.5) n=1,692

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.88 years of 79.0, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured