Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

13777

in Glen Aubrey, New YorkPopulation 656

52.50/ 100

Ranked #12,755 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 40%)

Ranked #1,265 of 1,730 New York ZIPs (bottom 27%)

Ranked #18 of 34 Binghamton, NY ZIPs (bottom 47%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Broad coverage across health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Unemployment rate

13.6%

in the top 4.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The share of the civilian labor force that is unemployed.

Full methodology ›

Natural-disaster risk

in the bottom 5.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST9th
US5th
Definition & source ›

This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.

Full methodology ›

Industrial-pollution burden

in the bottom 7.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST7th
US7th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

Energy-cost burden

4.5%

in the top 17% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US83rd
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of household income spent on home energy bills — electricity, gas, and heating fuels.

A modeled share of household income spent on home energy. Estimates that hit the model’s 100% ceiling are suppressed rather than published, because at that point the figure reflects the model’s limit rather than a measured burden.

Full methodology ›

The read

In overall standing, Glen Aubrey, New York (ZIP 13777) comes out in the top 40% healthiest ZIPs nationally (12,755th) and the bottom 27% of New York (1,265th), based on limited data; treat as directional.

continue reading

Several readings land clearly in this area's favor and shape the picture: modeled disaster risk registers in the bottom 5.4% nationally, and industrial-pollution burden stands in the bottom 7.1% nationally. Modeled extreme heat lands at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs. Modeled expected annual loss is in the bottom 12.8% nationally. Crowded housing resides at the national minimum, shared with about 29% of ZIPs. Modeled tree cover rests in the top 16% nationally, and distance to a hazardous-chemical facility lies in the top 18% nationally. Set against that, unemployment sits in the top 4.8% nationally. Fiber broadband settles at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs. Recreation registers at the national minimum, shared with about 35% of ZIPs.

In plain terms, disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. Industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. Expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. The nearest healthier ZIP overall is ZIP 13790, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Binghamton, NY metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 64%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 68%

13%

Disability

healthier than 65%

7%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 96%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 59%

21%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 47%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 41%

8%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 16%

16%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 22%

5%

Lifting this score

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 96%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 59%

14%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 34%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 15%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 26%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 35%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 7%

8%

Disability

healthier than 34%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 20%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 92%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 86%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 90%

11%

Disability

healthier than 88%

7%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

in the top 0.00%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 71%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

in the bottom 0.00%

16%

Preventive Care

in the bottom 0.00%

13%

Mental Health

in the bottom 0.5%

8%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults30.3%27.6–33.2
High blood pressure among adults34.4%31.1–37.7
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults8.7%7.9–9.6
Current asthma among adults12.2%10.9–13.6
Coronary heart disease among adults6.4%5.7–7.2
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults7.9%6.9–8.9
Depression among adults23.0%20.1–26.0
Diagnosed diabetes among adults10.4%9.1–11.9
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened34.5%31.2–37.8
Obesity among adults35.6%30.7–40.6
Stroke among adults3.4%3.1–3.8
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years12.4%10.0–15.0
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years6.0%4.9–7.2
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure74.6%71.6–77.4
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults80.6%77.7–83.3
Cholesterol screening among adults88.3%86.7–89.8
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years67.4%62.7–71.4
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults62.5%59.0–65.7
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years76.8%70.1–82.3
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults16.9%14.4–19.7
Current cigarette smoking among adults15.9%13.5–18.3
No leisure-time physical activity among adults24.3%20.8–28.0
Short sleep duration among adults35.9%31.2–40.4
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults17.7%15.4–20.2
Frequent mental distress among adults17.9%16.0–20.0
Frequent physical distress among adults14.2%12.6–16.0
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults14.3%12.6–16.0
Any disability among adults28.2%24.8–31.8
Hearing disability among adults6.2%5.4–6.9
Independent living disability among adults8.4%7.4–9.5
Mobility disability among adults13.4%11.6–15.3
Self-care disability among adults3.8%3.4–4.3
Vision disability among adults4.7%4.1–5.2
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults25.0%20.7–29.6
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults14.1%11.3–17.4
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults14.1%11.4–17.4
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults12.7%10.4–15.3
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults8.0%6.7–9.4
Loneliness among adults34.9%29.3–40.8
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults8.0%6.6–9.5
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NY median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate11.9%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.5% (2.5–22.6%) n=1,734
Uninsured 18–6411.2%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2865.0% (0.0–13.1%) n=1,734
No HS diploma (25+)9.1%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5057.1% (1.2–17.5%) n=1,743
Bachelor's or higher (25+)20.2%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50531.8% (13.9–62.1%) n=1,743
Unemployment rate (16+)13.6%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.4% (0.0–9.7%) n=1,730
Households without a vehicle1.7%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3225.7% (0.0–28.9%) n=1,730
Broadband subscription91.4%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32291.5% (81.1–98.3%) n=1,730
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)21.9%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32227.2% (14.2–45.5%) n=1,730
Homeownership rate88.0%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32280.2% (40.9–94.8%) n=1,730
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.0% (0.0–6.6%) n=1,730
Foreign-born population7.5%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5534.8% (0.0–28.7%) n=1,746
Single-parent households35.6%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08754.0% (36.7–74.5%) n=1,716
Population 65+16.2%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.0% (12.0–33.2%) n=1,746
Median age37.3 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.5 yr (34.6–56.1) n=1,733
Median household income$65,625$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$81,837 ($55,470–$145,610) n=1,626
Median home value$195,700$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$247,700 ($121,180–$801,380) n=1,629
Median gross rent$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,162 ($782–$2,359) n=1,367
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NY median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth82.6 yr ± 1.6378.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.9 yr (78.0–84.5) n=1,692

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.63 years of 82.6, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured