Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

13205

in Syracuse, New YorkPopulation 19,137

38.35/ 100

Ranked #27,818 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 13.3%)

Ranked #1,713 of 1,730 New York ZIPs (bottom 1.0%)

Ranked #85 of 87 Syracuse, NY ZIPs (bottom 2.3%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Self-care disability

8.2%

in the top 2.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with difficulty dressing or bathing.

Full methodology ›

Transit access

14 per 1,000 residents

in the top 0.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The number of public-transit stops inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Independent-living disability

14.8%

in the top 2.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have difficulty doing errands alone, such as visiting a doctor’s office, because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition.

Full methodology ›

Stroke

6.4%

in the top 2.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.

Full methodology ›

Vision disability

10.5%

in the top 3.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are blind or have serious difficulty seeing even with glasses.

Full methodology ›

Lead in tap water

12 ppb

in the top 1.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

US98th
Definition & source ›

The lead level at the 90th percentile of tap-water samples reported by the public water systems serving this ZIP, in parts per billion — the EPA requires action above 15 ppb.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Subsidized affordable housing

761 units

in the top 2.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST96th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The number of affordable rental units in this ZIP supported by the federal Low-Income Housing Tax Credit program.

Full methodology ›

Households without a vehicle

28.2%

in the top 2.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST90th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The share of households with no vehicle available.

Full methodology ›

Mobility disability

24.6%

in the top 4.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.

Full methodology ›

Utility shut-off threat

17.9%

in the top 3.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults whose household was threatened with a utility shut-off in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

The read

On balance, and by the composite measure, ZIP 13205, one of several in Syracuse, New York ranks in the bottom 13.3% nationally (27,818th) and the bottom 1.0% of New York (1,713th).

continue reading

The measures that press hardest set the tone here: modeled self-care disability stands in the top 2.5% nationally, and independent living disability settles in the top 2.9% nationally. Modeled stroke lies in the top 2.5% nationally, and vision disability resides in the top 3.9% nationally. Lead in tap water lands in the top 1.7% nationally, households without a vehicle registers in the top 2.7% nationally, and modeled mobility disability sits in the top 4.0% nationally. Modeled utility shutoff rests in the top 3.8% nationally. On the stronger side, transit is in the top 0.6% nationally, and subsidized affordable housing stands in the top 2.4% nationally.

Compared with the ZIPs it borders, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In plainer terms, lead in tap water is the EPA trigger, 15 parts per billion in tap samples, above which a water system must act on lead. Subsidized affordable housing is the main federal tax-credit program (HUD) funding affordable rental housing, counted as local units it supports. For a healthier nearby ZIP overall, look to ZIP 13078, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Syracuse, NY metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Preventive Care

healthier than 73%

13%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 86%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 91%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 42%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 48%

8%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 5%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 4%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 18%

11%

Disability

healthier than 4%

7%

Lifting this score

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 65%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 91%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

in the bottom 0.2%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 3%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 32%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 30%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 12%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 11%

8%

Disability

in the bottom 0.8%

7%

Lifting this score

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 82%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 93%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

in the bottom 0.00%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 3%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 25%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 27%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 25%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 30%

8%

Disability

in the bottom 0.00%

7%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Below its nearby ZIPs

    The ZIP codes that outlive their neighbors

    Estimated life expectancy is 77.1 ± 1.7 years. The 45 nearest ZIP codes with estimates average 81.2 years — 4.1 years below them.

    Ranked #3,051 of the 3,687 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above the nearby-ZIP average, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults33.7%31.0–36.5
High blood pressure among adults47.8%44.6–51.1
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.1%8.3–10.0
Current asthma among adults13.3%11.9–14.8
Coronary heart disease among adults10.1%9.2–11.2
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults11.5%10.2–12.8
Depression among adults20.5%17.9–23.3
Diagnosed diabetes among adults18.4%16.4–20.5
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened37.8%34.5–41.2
Obesity among adults45.1%40.4–49.9
Stroke among adults6.4%5.9–7.0
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years25.6%22.0–29.1
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years10.4%9.0–12.0
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure81.7%79.6–83.5
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults84.7%82.3–86.8
Cholesterol screening among adults87.4%85.9–88.7
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years67.1%62.9–71.1
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults52.0%48.7–55.1
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years79.5%73.8–84.5
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults11.3%9.6–13.3
Current cigarette smoking among adults17.5%15.6–19.7
No leisure-time physical activity among adults37.0%33.2–41.2
Short sleep duration among adults43.1%38.5–47.5
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults29.3%26.5–32.3
Frequent mental distress among adults18.9%17.1–21.0
Frequent physical distress among adults18.5%16.7–20.6
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults17.6%15.9–19.6
Any disability among adults41.0%37.5–44.9
Hearing disability among adults8.4%7.5–9.4
Independent living disability among adults14.8%13.3–16.4
Mobility disability among adults24.6%22.3–27.2
Self-care disability among adults8.2%7.5–9.0
Vision disability among adults10.5%9.6–11.5
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults29.7%26.2–33.4
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults31.9%28.9–35.1
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults34.5%31.6–37.6
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults24.7%22.3–27.2
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults16.7%15.1–18.6
Loneliness among adults37.1%32.8–41.7
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults17.9%16.0–19.8
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NY median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate31.5%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.5% (2.5–22.6%) n=1,734
Uninsured 18–646.1%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2865.0% (0.0–13.1%) n=1,734
No HS diploma (25+)17.1%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5057.1% (1.2–17.5%) n=1,743
Bachelor's or higher (25+)22.4%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50531.8% (13.9–62.1%) n=1,743
Unemployment rate (16+)9.4%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.4% (0.0–9.7%) n=1,730
Households without a vehicle28.2%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3225.7% (0.0–28.9%) n=1,730
Broadband subscription86.5%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32291.5% (81.1–98.3%) n=1,730
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)44.3%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32227.2% (14.2–45.5%) n=1,730
Homeownership rate45.7%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32280.2% (40.9–94.8%) n=1,730
Crowded housing (>1 per room)4.1%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.0% (0.0–6.6%) n=1,730
Foreign-born population10.5%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5534.8% (0.0–28.7%) n=1,746
Single-parent households30.3%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08754.0% (36.7–74.5%) n=1,716
Population 65+24.4%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.0% (12.0–33.2%) n=1,746
Median age38.1 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.5 yr (34.6–56.1) n=1,733
Median household income$38,497$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$81,837 ($55,470–$145,610) n=1,626
Median home value$99,000$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$247,700 ($121,180–$801,380) n=1,629
Median gross rent$993$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,162 ($782–$2,359) n=1,367
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NY median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth77.1 yr ± 0.8978.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.9 yr (78.0–84.5) n=1,692

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.89 years of 77.1, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured