ZIP code

13080

in Jordan, New YorkPopulation 3,313

ZipVitals Score

How is the ZipVitals Score calculated? →

53.68/ 100

Ranked #11,112 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 35%)

Ranked #1,165 of 1,730 New York ZIPs (bottom 33%)

Ranked #48 of 87 Syracuse, NY ZIPs (bottom 45%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

Jump to a section

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Child-care access

0.59 per 1,000 residents

in the top 7.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST93rd

US93rd

Definition & source ›

The number of child day-care services inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Uninsured (under 65)

5.3%

in the bottom 8.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST36th

US8th

Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 18–64 with no current health-insurance coverage.

Full methodology ›

The read

On balance, and by the composite measure, Jordan, New York (ZIP 13080) ranks in the top 35% healthiest ZIPs nationally (11,112th) and the bottom 33% of New York (1,165th).

A number of signals point in a favorable direction for this area: childcare lands in the top 7.4% nationally. Modeled extreme heat registers at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs. Modeled colon screening sits in the top 12.3% nationally, uninsured rests in the bottom 8.3% nationally, and disaster risk is in the bottom 18% nationally. Unemployment stands in the bottom 20% nationally. Working the other way, modeled pfas settles in the top 12.6% nationally, and lead in tap water lies in the top 14.9% nationally. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility resides at the national minimum, shared with about 31% of ZIPs. Floodplain exposure lands in the top 16% nationally.

In plainer terms, pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. Lead in tap water is the EPA trigger, 15 parts per billion in tap samples, above which a water system must act on lead. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is a plant handling large amounts of hazardous chemicals that must file an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases. For a healthier nearby ZIP overall, look to ZIP 13060, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Syracuse, NY metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare withinUnited StatesNew YorkMetro area

DomainHow this ZIP comparesShare

Lifting this score

healthier than most of the United States

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 63%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 90%

13%

Disability

healthier than 61%

About typical

close to the middle of the United States

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 43%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 53%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 54%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 58%

Holding it back

less healthy than most of the United States

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 39%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 35%

DomainHow this ZIP comparesShare

Lifting this score

healthier than most of New York

Preventive Care

healthier than 61%

13%

About typical

close to the middle of New York

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 48%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 58%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 43%

11%

Holding it back

less healthy than most of New York

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 17%

21%

Mental Health

healthier than 16%

Disability

healthier than 30%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 11%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 29%

DomainHow this ZIP comparesShare

Nothing measured is lifting this score.

About typical

close to the middle of this metro area

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 48%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 47%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 50%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 48%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 47%

Holding it back

less healthy than most of this metro area

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 25%

21%

Disability

healthier than 35%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 15%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 35%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS

Measure	Crude prevalence	95% CI
Arthritis among adults	30.5%	28.1–32.9
High blood pressure among adults	37.9%	35.1–40.7
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults	10.5%	9.7–11.4
Current asthma among adults	11.4%	10.3–12.4
Coronary heart disease among adults	7.6%	7.0–8.4
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults	8.1%	7.2–9.2
Depression among adults	22.3%	20.0–24.8
Diagnosed diabetes among adults	11.6%	10.4–12.9
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened	38.8%	35.9–41.5
Obesity among adults	36.7%	32.7–40.8
Stroke among adults	3.8%	3.5–4.2
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years	13.0%	11.2–15.2

PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS

Measure	Crude prevalence	95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years	5.3%	4.5–6.3
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure	79.6%	77.4–81.6
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults	82.3%	80.2–84.2
Cholesterol screening among adults	89.9%	88.7–90.9
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years	71.6%	68.3–74.6
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults	63.6%	60.8–66.3
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years	78.4%	73.4–82.7

Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS

Measure	Crude prevalence	95% CI
Binge drinking among adults	16.4%	14.4–18.5
Current cigarette smoking among adults	13.8%	11.9–15.9
No leisure-time physical activity among adults	24.7%	21.7–27.8
Short sleep duration among adults	36.7%	33.1–40.4

Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS

Measure	Crude prevalence	95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults	17.8%	15.8–20.0
Frequent mental distress among adults	16.5%	15.0–18.1
Frequent physical distress among adults	14.7%	13.2–16.2

DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS

Measure	Crude prevalence	95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults	12.9%	11.6–14.3
Any disability among adults	30.0%	27.0–33.1
Hearing disability among adults	7.0%	6.4–7.7
Independent living disability among adults	8.3%	7.5–9.2
Mobility disability among adults	14.9%	13.3–16.8
Self-care disability among adults	4.0%	3.6–4.4
Vision disability among adults	4.7%	4.2–5.2

Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS

Measure	Crude prevalence	95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults	23.0%	20.4–25.7
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults	12.2%	10.4–14.2
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults	11.3%	9.6–13.1
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults	10.5%	9.1–12.0
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults	6.9%	6.1–7.8
Loneliness among adults	32.2%	29.0–35.7
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults	6.5%	5.7–7.4

Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed

Measure	Value	US median (p10–p90)	NY median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate	10.5%	10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,364	9.5% (2.5–22.6%) n=1,734
Uninsured 18–64	4.2%	9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,286	5.0% (0.0–13.1%) n=1,734
No HS diploma (25+)	7.1%	7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,505	7.1% (1.2–17.5%) n=1,743
Bachelor's or higher (25+)	26.2%	23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,505	31.8% (13.9–62.1%) n=1,743
Unemployment rate (16+)	1.2%	3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,274	4.4% (0.0–9.7%) n=1,730
Households without a vehicle	3.8%	3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,322	5.7% (0.0–28.9%) n=1,730
Broadband subscription	92.7%	89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,322	91.5% (81.1–98.3%) n=1,730
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)	19.0%	23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,322	27.2% (14.2–45.5%) n=1,730
Homeownership rate	83.3%	78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,322	80.2% (40.9–94.8%) n=1,730
Crowded housing (>1 per room)	1.4%	1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,322	1.0% (0.0–6.6%) n=1,730
Foreign-born population	1.8%	2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,553	4.8% (0.0–28.7%) n=1,746
Single-parent households	62.0%	53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,087	54.0% (36.7–74.5%) n=1,716
Population 65+	23.9%	19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,553	20.0% (12.0–33.2%) n=1,746
Median age	48.7 yr	42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,292	43.5 yr (34.6–56.1) n=1,733
Median household income	$83,882	$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318	$81,837 ($55,470–$145,610) n=1,626
Median home value	$166,700	$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049	$247,700 ($121,180–$801,380) n=1,629
Median gross rent	$793	$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670	$1,162 ($782–$2,359) n=1,367

Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based

Measure	Value	US median (p10–p90)	NY median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth	81.7 yr ± 1.33	78.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,308	80.9 yr (78.0–84.5) n=1,692

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.33 years of 81.7, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

Statistically similar ZIPs nationally

Similar means a ZIP whose health profile is shaped like this one’s — the same pattern of strengths and weaknesses across the nine health domains behind the Score, not similar demographics or income. The percentage is how closely the two patterns line up. A very similar ZIP can still have a different overall Score.

42122Kentucky95% similar
Score 54.67View 42122 Compare this ZIP with 42122
54964Wisconsin95% similar
Score 54.81View 54964 Compare this ZIP with 54964
13112New York94% similar
Score 57.42View 13112 Compare this ZIP with 13112
13116New York94% similar
Score 56.76View 13116 Compare this ZIP with 13116
53059Wisconsin93% similar
Score 54.14View 53059 Compare this ZIP with 53059
23038Virginia93% similar
Score 52.37View 23038 Compare this ZIP with 23038
02790Massachusetts93% similar
Score 56.17View 02790 Compare this ZIP with 02790
13051New York93% similar
Score 60.78View 13051 Compare this ZIP with 13051
23438Virginia92% similar
Score 54.69View 23438 Compare this ZIP with 23438
20609Maryland92% similar
Score 53.40View 20609 Compare this ZIP with 20609

as of 2026

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured