Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

12944

in Keeseville, New YorkPopulation 3,910

55.03/ 100

Ranked #9,402 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 29%)

Ranked #1,024 of 1,730 New York ZIPs (bottom 41%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Broad coverage across health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Tree cover

79.7%

in the top 5.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST93rd
US95th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.

Full methodology ›

Industrial-pollution burden

in the bottom 7.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST8th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

Recreation access

0.98 per 1,000 residents

in the top 9.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST87th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The number of places for physical recreation — gyms, sports, and fitness venues — inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

72.7%

in the top 8.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST79th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

Uninsured (under 65)

5.5%

in the bottom 10.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST42nd
US10th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 18–64 with no current health-insurance coverage.

Full methodology ›

Natural-disaster risk

in the top 26% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US74th
Definition & source ›

This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.

Full methodology ›

The read

In overall standing, ZIP 12944, one of several in Keeseville, New York comes out in the top 29% healthiest ZIPs nationally (9,402nd) and the bottom 41% of New York (1,024th), based on limited data; treat as directional.

continue reading

Several readings land clearly in this area's favor and shape the picture: modeled tree cover lies in the top 5.0% nationally, modeled industrial-pollution burden sits in the bottom 7.8% nationally, and recreation settles in the top 9.3% nationally. Modeled extreme heat registers at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs. Modeled colon screening stands in the top 8.2% nationally, and uninsured lands in the bottom 10.0% nationally. Pharmacy is in the top 19% nationally, and modeled mammography resides in the top 18% nationally. Set against that, modeled loud transportation noise rests in the top 17% nationally, and pfas lies in the top 20% nationally.

In plain terms, industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. Pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. Extreme heat is a modeled count of days a year reaching a dangerously high temperature, a leading weather hazard. The nearest healthier ZIP overall is ZIP 12912, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 67%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 87%

13%

Disability

healthier than 67%

7%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 94%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 54%

21%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 56%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 55%

8%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 37%

16%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 22%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 64%

14%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 92%

5%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 52%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 45%

11%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 28%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 33%

16%

Mental Health

healthier than 15%

8%

Disability

healthier than 37%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 20%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults29.5%27.3–32.0
High blood pressure among adults35.0%32.4–37.9
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.8%9.0–10.5
Current asthma among adults11.5%10.6–12.6
Coronary heart disease among adults7.0%6.4–7.7
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults7.9%7.0–8.8
Depression among adults22.3%20.0–24.8
Diagnosed diabetes among adults10.9%9.8–12.1
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened37.2%34.4–40.2
Obesity among adults34.4%30.1–38.9
Stroke among adults3.6%3.3–3.9
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years14.0%12.1–16.1
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years5.5%4.6–6.5
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure77.6%75.4–79.7
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults80.3%78.0–82.6
Cholesterol screening among adults89.1%87.8–90.3
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years72.7%69.6–75.6
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults65.6%63.0–68.2
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years78.9%74.5–83.2
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults17.0%14.9–19.3
Current cigarette smoking among adults14.3%12.5–16.3
No leisure-time physical activity among adults25.4%22.4–28.6
Short sleep duration among adults34.3%30.5–38.3
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults17.6%15.6–19.7
Frequent mental distress among adults16.8%15.4–18.4
Frequent physical distress among adults14.2%12.9–15.7
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults13.1%11.8–14.5
Any disability among adults28.7%25.8–31.7
Hearing disability among adults6.6%6.0–7.3
Independent living disability among adults8.1%7.2–8.9
Mobility disability among adults13.8%12.3–15.4
Self-care disability among adults3.8%3.4–4.2
Vision disability among adults4.5%4.1–5.0
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults22.5%20.2–25.1
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults12.4%10.7–14.3
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults11.5%9.8–13.3
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults10.7%9.4–12.1
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults7.1%6.3–7.9
Loneliness among adults31.9%28.7–35.4
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults6.8%6.0–7.6
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NY median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate18.9%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.5% (2.5–22.6%) n=1,734
Uninsured 18–6414.1%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2865.0% (0.0–13.1%) n=1,734
No HS diploma (25+)9.3%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5057.1% (1.2–17.5%) n=1,743
Bachelor's or higher (25+)26.7%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50531.8% (13.9–62.1%) n=1,743
Unemployment rate (16+)5.5%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.4% (0.0–9.7%) n=1,730
Households without a vehicle4.9%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3225.7% (0.0–28.9%) n=1,730
Broadband subscription90.0%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32291.5% (81.1–98.3%) n=1,730
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)28.4%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32227.2% (14.2–45.5%) n=1,730
Homeownership rate77.4%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32280.2% (40.9–94.8%) n=1,730
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.6%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.0% (0.0–6.6%) n=1,730
Foreign-born population2.5%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5534.8% (0.0–28.7%) n=1,746
Single-parent households53.5%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08754.0% (36.7–74.5%) n=1,716
Population 65+19.8%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.0% (12.0–33.2%) n=1,746
Median age40.5 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.5 yr (34.6–56.1) n=1,733
Median household income$72,207$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$81,837 ($55,470–$145,610) n=1,626
Median home value$141,700$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$247,700 ($121,180–$801,380) n=1,629
Median gross rent$1,091$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,162 ($782–$2,359) n=1,367
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NY median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth78.7 yr ± 0.8978.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.9 yr (78.0–84.5) n=1,692

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.89 years of 78.7, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured