Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

12740

in Grahamsville, New YorkPopulation 1,732

59.51/ 100

Ranked #5,204 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 16%)

Ranked #649 of 1,730 New York ZIPs (top 38%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Tree cover

89.6%

in the top 1.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST98th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.

Full methodology ›

Fatal road crashes

0 per 100,000 residents per year

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The annual rate of fatal road crashes per 100,000 residents, pooled over a ten-year window.

A rate per resident population. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the rate to be reliable — about 30% of US ZIPs — no value is published rather than an unstable one; those ZIPs are absent from this comparison, not counted as crash-free.

Full methodology ›

Recreation access

1.2 per 1,000 residents

in the top 6.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST91st
US94th
Definition & source ›

The number of places for physical recreation — gyms, sports, and fitness venues — inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Poverty rate

2.5%

in the bottom 8.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST10th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents whose income is below the federal poverty line, from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey.

Full methodology ›

Home broadband subscription

74.5%

in the bottom 9.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST5th
US9th
Definition & source ›

The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.

Full methodology ›

Cognitive disability

10.8%

in the bottom 8.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST25th
US9th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions.

Full methodology ›

Uninsured (under 65)

4.8%

in the bottom 5.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST22nd
US5th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 18–64 with no current health-insurance coverage.

Full methodology ›

The read

By the composite health measure, Grahamsville, New York (ZIP 12740) ranks in the top 16% healthiest ZIPs nationally (5,204th) and the top 38% of New York (649th).

continue reading

A number of measures pull each way for this area: modeled tree cover stands in the top 1.5% nationally, and fatal road crashes lies at the national minimum. Recreation lands in the top 6.3% nationally, and poverty sits in the bottom 8.1% nationally. Modeled extreme heat is at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs. Modeled cognitive disability settles in the bottom 8.9% nationally. Modeled loud transportation noise resides at the national minimum, shared with about 22% of ZIPs. Modeled obesity registers in the bottom 12.7% nationally. Set against that, home broadband subscription rests in the bottom 9.5% nationally. Fiber broadband stands at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs.

To spell things out, extreme heat is a modeled count of days a year reaching a dangerously high temperature, a leading weather hazard. Loud transportation noise is the modeled share of an area exposed to road, rail, and air noise at or above 65 decibels, near conversation volume. Close by, ZIP 12494, just across the boundary, ranks healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 61%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 70%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 88%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 67%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 88%

8%

Disability

healthier than 79%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 92%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 52%

16%

Holding it back

Healthcare Access

healthier than 35%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 69%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 87%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 46%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 55%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 59%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 56%

8%

Disability

healthier than 53%

7%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 36%

21%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 29%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults29.7%26.8–32.9
High blood pressure among adults35.7%32.0–39.3
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults11.0%10.1–12.0
Current asthma among adults10.4%9.4–11.6
Coronary heart disease among adults7.1%6.3–8.0
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults6.8%5.7–8.0
Depression among adults19.4%16.9–22.2
Diagnosed diabetes among adults10.7%9.3–12.2
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened39.0%35.4–42.8
Obesity among adults28.5%23.3–34.4
Stroke among adults3.5%3.1–3.9
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years12.6%10.6–14.9
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years4.8%4.0–6.0
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure79.5%77.1–81.8
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults82.0%79.4–84.4
Cholesterol screening among adults91.1%89.8–92.3
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years70.7%66.8–74.3
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults65.8%63.0–68.5
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years75.2%68.8–80.9
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults15.7%13.4–18.3
Current cigarette smoking among adults11.0%9.1–13.2
No leisure-time physical activity among adults23.4%19.6–27.5
Short sleep duration among adults38.1%33.0–43.3
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults15.6%13.4–18.1
Frequent mental distress among adults14.2%12.6–15.9
Frequent physical distress among adults13.0%11.4–14.8
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults10.8%9.4–12.4
Any disability among adults26.4%22.9–30.2
Hearing disability among adults6.9%6.1–7.8
Independent living disability among adults6.9%6.0–8.0
Mobility disability among adults13.1%11.2–15.3
Self-care disability among adults3.3%2.9–3.8
Vision disability among adults4.1%3.6–4.7
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults20.8%18.0–24.2
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults9.9%8.1–12.0
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults8.5%6.9–10.3
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults8.8%7.4–10.4
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults5.8%5.0–6.7
Loneliness among adults28.9%25.1–33.5
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults5.3%4.6–6.2
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NY median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate2.5%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.5% (2.5–22.6%) n=1,734
Uninsured 18–641.4%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2865.0% (0.0–13.1%) n=1,734
No HS diploma (25+)4.9%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5057.1% (1.2–17.5%) n=1,743
Bachelor's or higher (25+)40.7%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50531.8% (13.9–62.1%) n=1,743
Unemployment rate (16+)5.5%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.4% (0.0–9.7%) n=1,730
Households without a vehicle5.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3225.7% (0.0–28.9%) n=1,730
Broadband subscription74.5%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32291.5% (81.1–98.3%) n=1,730
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)19.2%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32227.2% (14.2–45.5%) n=1,730
Homeownership rate82.9%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32280.2% (40.9–94.8%) n=1,730
Crowded housing (>1 per room)5.4%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.0% (0.0–6.6%) n=1,730
Foreign-born population4.6%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5534.8% (0.0–28.7%) n=1,746
Single-parent households64.4%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08754.0% (36.7–74.5%) n=1,716
Population 65+21.1%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.0% (12.0–33.2%) n=1,746
Median age46.5 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.5 yr (34.6–56.1) n=1,733
Median household income$103,462$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$81,837 ($55,470–$145,610) n=1,626
Median home value$298,200$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$247,700 ($121,180–$801,380) n=1,629
Median gross rent$871$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,162 ($782–$2,359) n=1,367
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NY median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth77.5 yr ± 1.1678.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.9 yr (78.0–84.5) n=1,692

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.16 years of 77.5, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured