Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

12563

in Patterson, New YorkPopulation 7,304

55.01/ 100

Ranked #9,427 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 29%)

Ranked #1,028 of 1,730 New York ZIPs (bottom 41%)

Ranked #722 of 853 New York-Newark-Jersey City, NY-NJ ZIPs (bottom 15%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

PFAS in drinking water

66.4%

in the top 5.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US95th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Housing-cost burden

44.6%

in the top 5.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST89th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.

Full methodology ›

Poverty rate

24.9%

in the top 11.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US89th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents whose income is below the federal poverty line, from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey.

Full methodology ›

Fine-particle (PM2.5) exceedance

0.55%

in the top 14.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US85th
Definition & source ›

The share of days in the year when modeled fine-particle (PM2.5) pollution was above the EPA’s daily limit of 35 micrograms per cubic meter.

Full methodology ›

The read

In overall standing, Patterson, New York (ZIP 12563) comes out in the top 29% healthiest ZIPs nationally (9,427th) and the bottom 41% of New York (1,028th).

continue reading

Several readings land clearly in this area's favor and shape the picture: modeled extreme heat lands at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs. Home broadband subscription is in the top 10.4% nationally, modeled hearing disability resides in the bottom 11.0% nationally, and grocery rests in the top 14.1% nationally. Park land lies in the top 15% nationally. Set against that, modeled pfas sits in the top 5.5% nationally, and housing-cost burden settles in the top 5.8% nationally. Poverty registers in the top 11.0% nationally, and modeled fine-particle stands in the top 14.9% nationally. Distance to a Superfund site lands in the bottom 16% nationally.

Relative to the ZIPs around it, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In plain terms, pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. Fine-particle is fine airborne particles about one-thirtieth the width of a hair, counted on modeled days above the EPA standard. Distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. The nearest healthier ZIP overall is ZIP 06784, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the New York-Newark-Jersey City, NY-NJ metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 75%

21%

Mental Health

healthier than 72%

8%

Disability

healthier than 67%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 64%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 40%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 46%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 53%

13%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 56%

5%

Holding it back

Risk Behavior

healthier than 27%

11%

Nothing measured is lifting this score.

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 57%

21%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 53%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 35%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 37%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 18%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 18%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 30%

8%

Disability

healthier than 37%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 20%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 64%

14%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 18%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 22%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 27%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 13%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 4%

8%

Disability

healthier than 20%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 33%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 33%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults24.9%22.0–28.0
High blood pressure among adults30.9%27.3–34.8
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults7.5%6.8–8.2
Current asthma among adults10.8%9.6–12.1
Coronary heart disease among adults5.8%5.2–6.5
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults6.7%5.9–7.6
Depression among adults19.7%16.8–22.9
Diagnosed diabetes among adults10.7%9.3–12.4
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened36.1%32.1–40.3
Obesity among adults32.2%25.9–39.5
Stroke among adults3.2%2.9–3.5
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years12.9%10.5–15.5
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years9.0%7.5–10.7
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure74.8%71.6–77.9
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults78.7%75.3–82.1
Cholesterol screening among adults87.8%86.2–89.4
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years66.4%61.7–70.9
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults61.6%58.1–65.0
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years76.8%69.7–83.0
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults17.5%14.6–20.9
Current cigarette smoking among adults14.2%12.1–16.7
No leisure-time physical activity among adults27.2%23.0–31.7
Short sleep duration among adults39.7%33.5–46.1
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults18.9%16.5–21.6
Frequent mental distress among adults16.7%14.9–18.8
Frequent physical distress among adults13.7%12.2–15.6
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults13.5%11.9–15.2
Any disability among adults26.6%23.0–30.7
Hearing disability among adults5.5%4.9–6.3
Independent living disability among adults8.2%7.3–9.3
Mobility disability among adults12.8%11.2–14.7
Self-care disability among adults4.0%3.6–4.5
Vision disability among adults5.4%4.8–6.0
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults23.9%20.4–27.8
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults18.2%15.5–21.4
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults16.6%14.3–19.4
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults15.7%13.6–18.2
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults9.3%8.1–10.6
Loneliness among adults32.9%28.0–38.1
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults9.7%8.4–11.2
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NY median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate24.9%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.5% (2.5–22.6%) n=1,734
Uninsured 18–6415.8%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2865.0% (0.0–13.1%) n=1,734
No HS diploma (25+)7.4%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5057.1% (1.2–17.5%) n=1,743
Bachelor's or higher (25+)31.4%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50531.8% (13.9–62.1%) n=1,743
Unemployment rate (16+)7.8%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.4% (0.0–9.7%) n=1,730
Households without a vehicle5.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3225.7% (0.0–28.9%) n=1,730
Broadband subscription97.0%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32291.5% (81.1–98.3%) n=1,730
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)44.6%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32227.2% (14.2–45.5%) n=1,730
Homeownership rate82.9%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32280.2% (40.9–94.8%) n=1,730
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.7%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.0% (0.0–6.6%) n=1,730
Foreign-born population11.7%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5534.8% (0.0–28.7%) n=1,746
Single-parent households55.0%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08754.0% (36.7–74.5%) n=1,716
Population 65+12.9%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.0% (12.0–33.2%) n=1,746
Median age40.4 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.5 yr (34.6–56.1) n=1,733
Median household income$98,415$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$81,837 ($55,470–$145,610) n=1,626
Median home value$412,300$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$247,700 ($121,180–$801,380) n=1,629
Median gross rent$1,544$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,162 ($782–$2,359) n=1,367
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NY median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth81.4 yr ± 1.0178.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.9 yr (78.0–84.5) n=1,692

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.01 years of 81.4, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured