ZIP code
12433
in Glenford, New YorkPopulation 470
60.19/ 100
Ranked #4,718 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 14.8%)
Ranked #596 of 1,730 New York ZIPs (top 34%)
Ranked #21 of 52 Kingston, NY ZIPs (top 40%)
Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.
What defines this ZIP
Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.
Loneliness
26.4%
in the bottom 1.7% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST2ndUS2ndDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who report feeling lonely.
Full methodology ›Home broadband subscription
100%
at the national maximum
Higher is healthier
ST99thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.
Full methodology ›Tree cover
83.9%
in the top 3.5% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST96thUS97thDefinition & source ›
The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.
Full methodology ›Cognitive disability
9.5%
in the bottom 3.3% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST12thUS3rdDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions.
Full methodology ›Housing-cost burden
43.6%
in the top 6.5% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST88thUS94thDefinition & source ›
The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.
Full methodology ›Floodplain exposure
0.03%
in the bottom 7.0% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST14thUS7thDefinition & source ›
The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 1%-annual-chance floodplain — the “100-year” flood zone, where flooding has about a 1-in-100 chance in any given year.
Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.
Full methodology ›Binge drinking
11.8%
in the bottom 5.8% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST1stUS6thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.
Full methodology ›Homeownership rate
95.4%
in the top 8.1% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST91stUS92ndDefinition & source ›
The share of occupied homes that are owned, rather than rented, by the people living in them.
Full methodology ›Colon-cancer screening
73.6%
in the top 5.7% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST86thUS94thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.
Full methodology ›Lack of transportation
5.1%
in the bottom 8.7% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST13thUS9thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who lacked reliable transportation in the past 12 months.
Full methodology ›The read
In its overall standing, Glenford, New York (ZIP 12433) lands in the top 14.8% healthiest ZIPs nationally (4,718th) and the top 34% of New York (596th).
Taken together, the data gives a genuinely mixed reading: modeled loneliness lands in the bottom 1.7% nationally, home broadband subscription lies at the national maximum, and modeled tree cover stands in the top 3.5% nationally. Modeled cognitive disability rests in the bottom 3.3% nationally, floodplain exposure registers in the bottom 7.0% nationally, and modeled binge drinking resides in the bottom 5.8% nationally. Households without a vehicle settles at the national minimum, shared with about 16% of ZIPs. Homeownership is in the top 8.1% nationally, and modeled colon screening sits in the top 5.7% nationally. On the other side, housing-cost burden lands in the top 6.5% nationally.
Against the wider neighborhood, park land runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Put simply, floodplain exposure is land with about a 1-in-100 chance of flooding each year, nicknamed the "100-year floodplain". On the overall standing, ZIP 12409, just across the boundary, ranks healthier.
What’s driving this score
Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Kingston, NY metro area.
Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.
Lifting this score
Preventive Care
healthier than 99%
13%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 91%
11%
Mental Health
healthier than 94%
8%
Disability
healthier than 75%
7%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 91%
5%
About typical
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 54%
16%
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 57%
14%
Holding it back
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 30%
21%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 23%
5%
Lifting this score
Preventive Care
healthier than 98%
13%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 94%
11%
Mental Health
healthier than 77%
8%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 82%
5%
About typical
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 48%
16%
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 49%
14%
Disability
healthier than 47%
7%
Holding it back
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 8%
21%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 21%
5%
Lifting this score
Preventive Care
healthier than 94%
13%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 90%
11%
Mental Health
healthier than 88%
8%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 92%
5%
About typical
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 56%
16%
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 46%
14%
Disability
healthier than 44%
7%
Holding it back
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 8%
21%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 22%
5%
“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›
Nearby & similar ZIPs
Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.
Nearby
12409
New Yorkshares a border
Score 66.03
Closest healthier
12491
New Yorkshares a border
Score 61.31
Similar health profile
12844
New York99% similar profile
Score 61.64
How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured
Evidence
Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.
Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Arthritis among adults | 35.7% | 31.9–39.6 |
| High blood pressure among adults | 43.8% | 39.6–48.2 |
| Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults | 13.5% | 12.2–14.9 |
| Current asthma among adults | 10.5% | 9.2–11.7 |
| Coronary heart disease among adults | 8.4% | 7.2–9.6 |
| Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults | 7.9% | 6.2–9.6 |
| Depression among adults | 18.4% | 15.6–21.2 |
| Diagnosed diabetes among adults | 12.8% | 10.9–15.0 |
| High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened | 44.2% | 39.9–48.4 |
| Obesity among adults | 29.1% | 23.8–34.7 |
| Stroke among adults | 4.2% | 3.6–4.8 |
| All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years | 11.7% | 9.5–14.2 |
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years | 3.7% | 2.7–4.9 |
| Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure | 84.2% | 81.4–86.6 |
| Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults | 86.3% | 83.8–88.4 |
| Cholesterol screening among adults | 94.0% | 92.9–94.9 |
| Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years | 73.6% | 69.3–77.5 |
| Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults | 68.8% | 65.4–71.8 |
| Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years | 79.4% | 73.0–84.7 |
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Binge drinking among adults | 11.8% | 9.8–14.0 |
| Current cigarette smoking among adults | 10.1% | 7.3–12.9 |
| No leisure-time physical activity among adults | 23.3% | 18.6–28.2 |
| Short sleep duration among adults | 34.4% | 29.2–39.7 |
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults | 15.7% | 12.8–19.1 |
| Frequent mental distress among adults | 12.7% | 10.8–14.6 |
| Frequent physical distress among adults | 13.8% | 11.7–16.1 |
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Cognitive disability among adults | 9.5% | 8.0–11.4 |
| Any disability among adults | 26.7% | 22.4–31.2 |
| Hearing disability among adults | 7.7% | 6.7–8.8 |
| Independent living disability among adults | 6.9% | 5.7–8.4 |
| Mobility disability among adults | 14.9% | 12.1–18.0 |
| Self-care disability among adults | 3.6% | 2.9–4.3 |
| Vision disability among adults | 4.3% | 3.6–5.1 |
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Lack of social and emotional support among adults | 19.2% | 15.9–22.9 |
| Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 8.6% | 6.5–11.2 |
| Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults | 7.8% | 5.7–10.5 |
| Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 7.5% | 5.9–9.5 |
| Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults | 5.1% | 4.1–6.2 |
| Loneliness among adults | 26.4% | 22.1–31.0 |
| Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults | 4.7% | 3.8–5.8 |
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | NY median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Poverty rate | 2.8% | 10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,364 | 9.5% (2.5–22.6%) n=1,734 |
| Uninsured 18–64 | 0.0% | 9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,286 | 5.0% (0.0–13.1%) n=1,734 |
| No HS diploma (25+) | 0.0% | 7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,505 | 7.1% (1.2–17.5%) n=1,743 |
| Bachelor's or higher (25+) | 55.3% | 23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,505 | 31.8% (13.9–62.1%) n=1,743 |
| Unemployment rate (16+) | 3.1% | 3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,274 | 4.4% (0.0–9.7%) n=1,730 |
| Households without a vehicle | 0.0% | 3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,322 | 5.7% (0.0–28.9%) n=1,730 |
| Broadband subscription | 100.0% | 89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,322 | 91.5% (81.1–98.3%) n=1,730 |
| Housing cost burden (≥30% income) | 43.6% | 23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,322 | 27.2% (14.2–45.5%) n=1,730 |
| Homeownership rate | 95.4% | 78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,322 | 80.2% (40.9–94.8%) n=1,730 |
| Crowded housing (>1 per room) | 0.0% | 1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,322 | 1.0% (0.0–6.6%) n=1,730 |
| Foreign-born population | 9.6% | 2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,553 | 4.8% (0.0–28.7%) n=1,746 |
| Single-parent households | 39.5% | 53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,087 | 54.0% (36.7–74.5%) n=1,716 |
| Population 65+ | 20.4% | 19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,553 | 20.0% (12.0–33.2%) n=1,746 |
| Median age | 46.8 yr | 42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,292 | 43.5 yr (34.6–56.1) n=1,733 |
| Median household income | $96,250 | $72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318 | $81,837 ($55,470–$145,610) n=1,626 |
| Median home value | $521,700 | $222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049 | $247,700 ($121,180–$801,380) n=1,629 |
| Median gross rent | — | $1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670 | $1,162 ($782–$2,359) n=1,367 |
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | NY median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Life expectancy at birth | 82.9 yr ± 1.95 | 78.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,308 | 80.9 yr (78.0–84.5) n=1,692 |
About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.95 years of 82.9, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.
More ZIPs to explore ▾More ZIPs to explore ▴
How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured