Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

12413

in Cairo, New YorkPopulation 3,368

52.07/ 100

Ranked #13,365 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 42%)

Ranked #1,293 of 1,730 New York ZIPs (bottom 25%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Grocery access

0.34 per 1,000 residents

in the top 3.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST96th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The number of full supermarkets inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one. ZipVitals’s food-access signal is derived from these in-ZIP densities — it is not USDA’s food-desert designation, which measures distance to the nearest supermarket. Where a leg is missing, a ZIP reads “not determinable,” never “not a food desert.”

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

71.4%

in the top 4.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US96th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a Superfund site

1.1 mi

in the bottom 7.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST11th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility

15.2 mi

in the top 7.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST91st
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest facility that handles enough hazardous chemicals to require an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases.

Full methodology ›

Recreation access

1 per 1,000 residents

in the top 8.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST89th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The number of places for physical recreation — gyms, sports, and fitness venues — inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Home broadband subscription

79.6%

in the bottom 16% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST8th
US16th
Definition & source ›

The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.

Full methodology ›

Fatal road crashes

26.7 per 100,000 residents per year

in the top 17% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US83rd
Definition & source ›

The annual rate of fatal road crashes per 100,000 residents, pooled over a ten-year window.

A rate per resident population. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the rate to be reliable — about 30% of US ZIPs — no value is published rather than an unstable one; those ZIPs are absent from this comparison, not counted as crash-free.

Full methodology ›

Fine-particle (PM2.5) exceedance

0.55%

in the top 17% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US83rd
Definition & source ›

The share of days in the year when modeled fine-particle (PM2.5) pollution was above the EPA’s daily limit of 35 micrograms per cubic meter.

Full methodology ›

The read

On the composite measure, Cairo, New York (ZIP 12413) stands in the top 42% healthiest ZIPs nationally (13,365th) and the bottom 25% of New York (1,293rd).

continue reading

Several of the strongest readings define how this area looks: grocery lands in the top 3.0% nationally, and distance to a hazardous-chemical facility settles in the top 7.9% nationally. Recreation rests in the top 8.4% nationally. Modeled extreme heat lands at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs. Pharmacy settles in the top 11.0% nationally. Modeled loud transportation noise rests at the national minimum, shared with about 22% of ZIPs. Modeled tree cover lands in the top 11.3% nationally, and industrial-pollution burden settles in the bottom 12.0% nationally. On the other hand, modeled pfas rests in the top 4.1% nationally, and distance to a Superfund site lands in the bottom 7.7% nationally.

Set beside the wider area around it, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. For clarity, pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. Distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is a plant handling large amounts of hazardous chemicals that must file an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases. ZIP 12405, just across the boundary, ranks better overall among the ZIPs nearby.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Preventive Care

healthier than 74%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 60%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 76%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 50%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 41%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 47%

14%

Disability

healthier than 56%

7%

Holding it back

Risk Behavior

healthier than 30%

11%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 21%

5%

Nothing measured is lifting this score.

About typical

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 44%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 24%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 35%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 37%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 32%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 20%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 18%

8%

Disability

healthier than 26%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 19%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults29.8%26.5–32.9
High blood pressure among adults35.7%31.6–39.3
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.5%8.6–10.4
Current asthma among adults11.2%9.9–12.4
Coronary heart disease among adults7.2%6.5–8.0
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults8.2%7.2–9.3
Depression among adults21.6%18.3–24.7
Diagnosed diabetes among adults11.7%10.1–13.3
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened38.9%34.5–42.7
Obesity among adults35.8%28.4–42.5
Stroke among adults3.8%3.4–4.1
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years12.9%10.6–15.7
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years6.2%5.2–7.3
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure78.1%75.1–80.6
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults80.8%77.4–83.4
Cholesterol screening among adults88.8%87.3–90.1
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years66.0%61.1–70.8
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults61.5%58.1–65.1
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years78.4%71.4–84.5
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults17.3%14.3–20.2
Current cigarette smoking among adults15.0%12.8–17.4
No leisure-time physical activity among adults26.8%22.5–31.1
Short sleep duration among adults38.9%32.5–45.7
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults18.9%16.5–21.6
Frequent mental distress among adults16.7%14.8–18.7
Frequent physical distress among adults15.0%13.3–16.9
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults13.5%11.9–15.2
Any disability among adults29.7%25.8–33.8
Hearing disability among adults6.9%6.2–7.7
Independent living disability among adults8.7%7.7–9.7
Mobility disability among adults14.8%12.9–16.9
Self-care disability among adults4.2%3.8–4.7
Vision disability among adults5.1%4.6–5.7
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults23.1%19.6–26.9
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults14.7%12.4–17.4
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults14.1%12.0–16.6
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults12.3%10.5–14.4
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults8.0%7.0–9.2
Loneliness among adults32.3%27.1–37.7
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults7.9%6.8–9.1
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NY median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate10.2%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.5% (2.5–22.6%) n=1,734
Uninsured 18–6410.6%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2865.0% (0.0–13.1%) n=1,734
No HS diploma (25+)5.4%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5057.1% (1.2–17.5%) n=1,743
Bachelor's or higher (25+)23.7%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50531.8% (13.9–62.1%) n=1,743
Unemployment rate (16+)1.1%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.4% (0.0–9.7%) n=1,730
Households without a vehicle4.6%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3225.7% (0.0–28.9%) n=1,730
Broadband subscription79.6%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32291.5% (81.1–98.3%) n=1,730
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)29.8%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32227.2% (14.2–45.5%) n=1,730
Homeownership rate67.9%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32280.2% (40.9–94.8%) n=1,730
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.0% (0.0–6.6%) n=1,730
Foreign-born population6.3%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5534.8% (0.0–28.7%) n=1,746
Single-parent households38.9%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08754.0% (36.7–74.5%) n=1,716
Population 65+23.5%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.0% (12.0–33.2%) n=1,746
Median age39.0 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.5 yr (34.6–56.1) n=1,733
Median household income$60,363$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$81,837 ($55,470–$145,610) n=1,626
Median home value$232,800$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$247,700 ($121,180–$801,380) n=1,629
Median gross rent$1,296$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,162 ($782–$2,359) n=1,367
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NY median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth79.8 yr ± 1.1078.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.9 yr (78.0–84.5) n=1,692

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.10 years of 79.8, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured