Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

12156

in Schodack Landing, New YorkPopulation 808

61.09/ 100

Ranked #4,067 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 12.7%)

Ranked #525 of 1,730 New York ZIPs (top 30%)

Ranked #38 of 114 Albany-Schenectady-Troy, NY ZIPs (top 33%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Broad coverage across health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Loud transportation noise

4.2%

in the top 1.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 65 decibels — around the volume of normal conversation.

Full methodology ›

Civic-institution access

1.2 per 1,000 residents

in the top 3.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST97th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The number of civic and social organizations inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Transportation noise

16.1%

in the top 3.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US96th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.

Full methodology ›

Recreation access

1.2 per 1,000 residents

in the top 6.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST92nd
US94th
Definition & source ›

The number of places for physical recreation — gyms, sports, and fitness venues — inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

74.3%

in the top 4.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST90th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

Cognitive disability

10.5%

in the bottom 7.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST22nd
US7th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions.

Full methodology ›

Food insecurity

8.5%

in the bottom 9.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST13th
US10th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced food insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Fair or poor health

13.4%

in the bottom 7.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST15th
US7th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who rate their own general health as fair or poor.

Full methodology ›

Arsenic in groundwater

13.5%

in the top 11.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US88th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Uninsured (under 65)

4.2%

in the bottom 3.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST11th
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 18–64 with no current health-insurance coverage.

Full methodology ›

The read

On the composite measure, Schodack Landing, New York (ZIP 12156) stands in the top 12.7% healthiest ZIPs nationally (4,067th) and the top 30% of New York (525th), based on limited data; treat as directional.

continue reading

A balanced set of signals defines this area, not any single one: civic lies in the top 3.1% nationally, and recreation is in the top 6.3% nationally. Modeled colon screening registers in the top 4.2% nationally. Households without a vehicle lies at the national minimum, shared with about 16% of ZIPs. Modeled cognitive disability is in the bottom 7.3% nationally. Modeled extreme heat registers at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs. Modeled food insecurity lies in the bottom 9.8% nationally, and fair or poor health is in the bottom 7.3% nationally. By contrast, modeled loud transportation noise registers in the top 1.9% nationally, and transportation noise lies in the top 3.8% nationally.

Set beside the wider area around it, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. For clarity, loud transportation noise is the modeled share of an area exposed to road, rail, and air noise at or above 65 decibels, near conversation volume. Transportation noise is the modeled share of an area exposed to average road, rail, and air noise at or above 55 decibels. Extreme heat is a modeled count of days a year reaching a dangerously high temperature, a leading weather hazard. ZIP 12033, just across the boundary, ranks better overall among the ZIPs nearby.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Albany-Schenectady-Troy, NY metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 76%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 75%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 93%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 61%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 85%

8%

Disability

healthier than 89%

7%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 80%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 17%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 29%

5%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 69%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 72%

13%

Disability

healthier than 75%

7%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 57%

21%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 51%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 51%

8%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 50%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 7%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 24%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 71%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 71%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 71%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 64%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 79%

8%

Disability

healthier than 84%

7%

About typical

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 47%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 47%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

in the bottom 0.00%

14%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults27.3%24.5–30.1
High blood pressure among adults31.9%28.7–35.1
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.0%9.1–10.9
Current asthma among adults10.5%9.5–11.7
Coronary heart disease among adults6.0%5.3–6.7
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults5.9%5.0–6.9
Depression among adults19.6%17.2–22.2
Diagnosed diabetes among adults9.3%8.1–10.6
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened38.0%34.4–41.3
Obesity among adults29.7%25.0–34.6
Stroke among adults3.0%2.6–3.3
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years8.5%7.2–10.0
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years4.2%3.3–5.3
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure77.7%75.0–80.2
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults80.4%77.7–82.9
Cholesterol screening among adults91.0%89.8–92.2
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years74.3%71.1–77.4
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults70.0%67.7–72.6
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years78.1%72.9–83.0
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults18.3%15.8–20.9
Current cigarette smoking among adults10.7%8.8–13.0
No leisure-time physical activity among adults20.0%16.9–23.5
Short sleep duration among adults38.1%34.0–42.8
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults13.4%11.5–15.6
Frequent mental distress among adults14.6%13.0–16.4
Frequent physical distress among adults11.9%10.5–13.6
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults10.5%9.2–12.1
Any disability among adults24.2%21.1–27.6
Hearing disability among adults5.8%5.2–6.5
Independent living disability among adults6.2%5.4–7.1
Mobility disability among adults10.9%9.3–12.7
Self-care disability among adults2.9%2.5–3.4
Vision disability among adults3.4%3.0–3.9
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults21.9%18.8–25.1
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults8.5%6.8–10.4
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults6.9%5.5–8.6
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults8.2%6.8–9.7
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults5.3%4.5–6.1
Loneliness among adults29.7%25.8–33.9
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults5.0%4.1–5.8
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NY median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate13.0%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.5% (2.5–22.6%) n=1,734
Uninsured 18–648.1%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2865.0% (0.0–13.1%) n=1,734
No HS diploma (25+)3.8%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5057.1% (1.2–17.5%) n=1,743
Bachelor's or higher (25+)30.8%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50531.8% (13.9–62.1%) n=1,743
Unemployment rate (16+)6.3%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.4% (0.0–9.7%) n=1,730
Households without a vehicle0.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3225.7% (0.0–28.9%) n=1,730
Broadband subscription94.1%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32291.5% (81.1–98.3%) n=1,730
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)18.7%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32227.2% (14.2–45.5%) n=1,730
Homeownership rate84.3%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32280.2% (40.9–94.8%) n=1,730
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.0% (0.0–6.6%) n=1,730
Foreign-born population0.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5534.8% (0.0–28.7%) n=1,746
Single-parent households48.6%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08754.0% (36.7–74.5%) n=1,716
Population 65+17.1%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.0% (12.0–33.2%) n=1,746
Median age30.3 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.5 yr (34.6–56.1) n=1,733
Median household income$108,274$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$81,837 ($55,470–$145,610) n=1,626
Median home value$242,000$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$247,700 ($121,180–$801,380) n=1,629
Median gross rent$1,075$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,162 ($782–$2,359) n=1,367
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NY median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth82.9 yr ± 1.8478.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.9 yr (78.0–84.5) n=1,692

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.84 years of 82.9, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured