Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

11715

in Blue Point, New YorkPopulation 3,936

67.09/ 100

Ranked #1,265 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 4.0%)

Ranked #188 of 1,730 New York ZIPs (top 10.9%)

Ranked #336 of 853 New York-Newark-Jersey City, NY-NJ ZIPs (top 39%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Median household income

$163,125

in the top 2.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST94th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The middle household income in this ZIP — half of households earn more, half earn less — in dollars per year.

Full methodology ›

PFOA in drinking water

100%

at the national maximum

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents served by public water systems where PFOA, one of the man-made “forever chemicals,” was detected in EPA testing.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

PFOS in drinking water

100%

at the national maximum

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents served by public water systems where PFOS, one of the most common “forever chemicals,” was detected in EPA testing.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Home broadband subscription

100%

at the national maximum

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.

Full methodology ›

Loneliness

27%

in the bottom 3.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST3rd
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report feeling lonely.

Full methodology ›

Lack of transportation

4.6%

in the bottom 4.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST7th
US4th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who lacked reliable transportation in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

100%

at the national maximum

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents served by public water systems where PFAS — man-made “forever chemicals” that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down — were detected in EPA testing.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Utility shut-off threat

4.3%

in the bottom 5.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST9th
US6th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults whose household was threatened with a utility shut-off in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Food insecurity

7.6%

in the bottom 5.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST7th
US6th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced food insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Cognitive disability

9.6%

in the bottom 3.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST13th
US4th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions.

Full methodology ›

The read

On the composite measure, Blue Point, New York (ZIP 11715) stands in the top 4.0% healthiest ZIPs nationally (1,265th) and the top 10.9% of New York (188th).

continue reading

A balanced set of signals defines this area, not any single one: household income is in the top 2.7% nationally, and home broadband subscription registers at the national maximum. Modeled loneliness lies in the bottom 3.1% nationally, and transportation is in the bottom 4.4% nationally. Modeled utility shutoff registers in the bottom 5.7% nationally, food insecurity lies in the bottom 5.8% nationally, and cognitive disability is in the bottom 3.6% nationally. By contrast, PFOA in drinking water registers at the national maximum, PFOS in drinking water lies at the national maximum, and PFAS in drinking water is at the national maximum.

Set beside the wider area around it, park land runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. For clarity, PFOA in drinking water is one of the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down. PFOS in drinking water is a common one of the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down. PFAS in drinking water is the family of man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down. ZIP 11705, just across the boundary, ranks better overall among the ZIPs nearby.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the New York-Newark-Jersey City, NY-NJ metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 82%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 86%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 85%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 97%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 81%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 94%

8%

Disability

healthier than 94%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 65%

5%

About typical

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 43%

5%

Nothing measured is holding this score back.

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 68%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 82%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 91%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 87%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 81%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 77%

8%

Disability

healthier than 85%

7%

About typical

Healthcare Access

healthier than 54%

5%

Holding it back

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 12%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 98%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 90%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 61%

11%

Disability

healthier than 64%

7%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 54%

16%

Mental Health

healthier than 42%

8%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 30%

21%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 23%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 35%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults25.2%22.7–27.8
High blood pressure among adults31.3%28.3–34.2
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.2%9.4–11.3
Current asthma among adults10.3%9.1–11.5
Coronary heart disease among adults5.6%4.8–6.5
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults5.1%4.0–6.3
Depression among adults17.0%14.9–19.3
Diagnosed diabetes among adults8.6%7.2–10.0
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened40.2%37.2–43.2
Obesity among adults27.8%24.2–31.5
Stroke among adults2.7%2.3–3.2
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years5.9%4.8–7.1
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years3.9%3.0–4.9
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure78.2%75.2–80.8
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults82.5%80.3–84.7
Cholesterol screening among adults92.0%90.5–93.2
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years71.2%67.8–74.5
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults74.3%72.1–76.6
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years81.4%77.0–85.2
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults17.5%15.2–19.9
Current cigarette smoking among adults8.4%6.3–10.6
No leisure-time physical activity among adults19.4%16.0–22.8
Short sleep duration among adults34.9%31.8–38.2
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults12.4%10.2–14.7
Frequent mental distress among adults13.7%11.8–15.5
Frequent physical distress among adults10.8%9.2–12.6
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults9.6%8.0–11.3
Any disability among adults23.3%20.0–26.7
Hearing disability among adults5.4%4.6–6.3
Independent living disability among adults5.5%4.5–6.6
Mobility disability among adults10.4%8.5–12.5
Self-care disability among adults2.5%2.1–3.0
Vision disability among adults3.1%2.6–3.6
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults19.8%16.9–23.1
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults7.6%5.7–9.7
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults5.9%4.3–7.7
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults7.3%5.8–9.0
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults4.6%3.8–5.5
Loneliness among adults27.0%23.5–30.9
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults4.3%3.5–5.2
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NY median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate6.9%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.5% (2.5–22.6%) n=1,734
Uninsured 18–640.8%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2865.0% (0.0–13.1%) n=1,734
No HS diploma (25+)1.9%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5057.1% (1.2–17.5%) n=1,743
Bachelor's or higher (25+)59.1%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50531.8% (13.9–62.1%) n=1,743
Unemployment rate (16+)6.7%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.4% (0.0–9.7%) n=1,730
Households without a vehicle3.8%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3225.7% (0.0–28.9%) n=1,730
Broadband subscription100.0%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32291.5% (81.1–98.3%) n=1,730
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)36.8%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32227.2% (14.2–45.5%) n=1,730
Homeownership rate90.5%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32280.2% (40.9–94.8%) n=1,730
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.0% (0.0–6.6%) n=1,730
Foreign-born population2.8%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5534.8% (0.0–28.7%) n=1,746
Single-parent households52.7%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08754.0% (36.7–74.5%) n=1,716
Population 65+20.4%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.0% (12.0–33.2%) n=1,746
Median age43.3 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.5 yr (34.6–56.1) n=1,733
Median household income$163,125$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$81,837 ($55,470–$145,610) n=1,626
Median home value$600,100$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$247,700 ($121,180–$801,380) n=1,629
Median gross rent$2,551$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,162 ($782–$2,359) n=1,367
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NY median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth75.8 yr ± 0.9378.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.9 yr (78.0–84.5) n=1,692

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.93 years of 75.8, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured