Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

10472

in Bronx, New YorkPopulation 64,011

39.85/ 100

Ranked #26,855 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 16%)

Ranked #1,704 of 1,730 New York ZIPs (bottom 1.6%)

Ranked #843 of 853 New York-Newark-Jersey City, NY-NJ ZIPs (bottom 1.2%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Vision disability

12.2%

in the top 2.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are blind or have serious difficulty seeing even with glasses.

Full methodology ›

Housing insecurity

35.4%

in the top 0.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced housing insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Households without a vehicle

64.6%

in the top 0.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of households with no vehicle available.

Full methodology ›

Food insecurity

44.7%

in the top 0.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced food insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Self-care disability

7.8%

in the top 3.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with difficulty dressing or bathing.

Full methodology ›

Housing-cost burden

57.2%

in the top 1.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.

Full methodology ›

Loneliness

42.5%

in the top 1.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report feeling lonely.

Full methodology ›

Fair or poor health

33.9%

in the top 3.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who rate their own general health as fair or poor.

Full methodology ›

Transportation noise

25.1%

in the top 1.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.

Full methodology ›

Walkability

230 intersections/sq mi

in the top 1.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST96th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

The read

Overall, ZIP 10472, one of several in Bronx, New York lands in the bottom 16% nationally (26,855th) and the bottom 1.6% of New York (1,704th).

continue reading

Where the load on this area runs deepest, the data leads: modeled vision disability stands in the top 2.0% nationally, and housing insecurity lies in the top 0.3% nationally. Households without a vehicle lands in the top 0.7% nationally, and modeled food insecurity sits in the top 0.9% nationally. Modeled self-care disability is in the top 3.3% nationally, housing-cost burden settles in the top 1.5% nationally, and modeled loneliness resides in the top 1.6% nationally. Modeled fair or poor health registers in the top 3.5% nationally, and transportation noise rests in the top 1.7% nationally. More encouragingly, walkability stands in the top 1.7% nationally.

Set beside the nearby areas, outer-floodplain exposure runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. A note on the terms: transportation noise is the modeled share of an area exposed to average road, rail, and air noise at or above 55 decibels. For a healthier nearby comparison, ZIP 10459, just across the boundary, ranks better overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the New York-Newark-Jersey City, NY-NJ metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Mental Health

healthier than 81%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 86%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 90%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 57%

21%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

in the bottom 0.6%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 10%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 11%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 6%

11%

Disability

healthier than 7%

7%

Lifting this score

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 65%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 89%

5%

About typical

Mental Health

healthier than 43%

8%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 32%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

in the bottom 0.2%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 2%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 2%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 3%

11%

Disability

healthier than 2%

7%

Lifting this score

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 78%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 86%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 6%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

in the bottom 0.2%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 10%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 6%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 3%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 8%

8%

Disability

healthier than 2%

7%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

2 of our published findings list this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Above what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 78.8 ± 1.3 years. A median household income of $41,039 predicts 76.6 years — 2.3 years above.

    Ranked #772 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

  • Highest-risk tenth

    Air toxics and the years between the two ends of the risk scale

    Modeled air-toxics cancer risk is 40.0 cases per million — among the tenth of compared ZIP codes with the most. Estimated life expectancy is 78.8 ± 1.3 years.

    Ranked #504 of the 4,173 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by modeled air-toxics risk, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults20.9%19.1–22.8
High blood pressure among adults34.5%32.1–37.0
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults4.1%3.7–4.5
Current asthma among adults11.6%10.5–12.8
Coronary heart disease among adults6.9%6.2–7.5
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults7.2%6.5–7.9
Depression among adults16.3%14.4–18.3
Diagnosed diabetes among adults16.5%15.0–18.2
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened36.6%34.0–39.2
Obesity among adults33.9%30.5–37.4
Stroke among adults4.3%4.0–4.7
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years23.6%20.2–27.1
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years19.7%17.6–21.9
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure73.4%70.9–75.6
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults79.3%77.0–81.6
Cholesterol screening among adults83.7%82.0–85.2
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years57.5%53.4–61.1
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults46.3%43.4–49.1
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years74.9%68.9–79.8
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults14.0%12.2–15.9
Current cigarette smoking among adults15.5%13.8–17.3
No leisure-time physical activity among adults42.6%39.4–45.9
Short sleep duration among adults44.2%40.5–47.7
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults33.9%31.3–36.4
Frequent mental distress among adults17.9%16.3–19.6
Frequent physical distress among adults18.2%16.6–19.9
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults19.0%17.3–20.8
Any disability among adults38.8%35.9–41.8
Hearing disability among adults6.0%5.4–6.7
Independent living disability among adults13.0%11.9–14.3
Mobility disability among adults21.9%20.1–23.8
Self-care disability among adults7.8%7.2–8.4
Vision disability among adults12.2%11.3–13.1
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults37.0%33.9–40.4
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults44.7%41.6–47.9
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults38.9%36.1–41.9
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults35.4%32.7–38.3
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults19.7%17.9–21.7
Loneliness among adults42.5%38.9–46.2
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults19.5%17.7–21.6
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NY median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate34.2%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.5% (2.5–22.6%) n=1,734
Uninsured 18–6419.9%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2865.0% (0.0–13.1%) n=1,734
No HS diploma (25+)32.0%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5057.1% (1.2–17.5%) n=1,743
Bachelor's or higher (25+)13.6%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50531.8% (13.9–62.1%) n=1,743
Unemployment rate (16+)9.5%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.4% (0.0–9.7%) n=1,730
Households without a vehicle64.6%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3225.7% (0.0–28.9%) n=1,730
Broadband subscription81.0%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32291.5% (81.1–98.3%) n=1,730
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)57.2%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32227.2% (14.2–45.5%) n=1,730
Homeownership rate16.4%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32280.2% (40.9–94.8%) n=1,730
Crowded housing (>1 per room)14.6%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.0% (0.0–6.6%) n=1,730
Foreign-born population40.4%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5534.8% (0.0–28.7%) n=1,746
Single-parent households25.7%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08754.0% (36.7–74.5%) n=1,716
Population 65+13.0%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.0% (12.0–33.2%) n=1,746
Median age33.2 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.5 yr (34.6–56.1) n=1,733
Median household income$41,039$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$81,837 ($55,470–$145,610) n=1,626
Median home value$666,600$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$247,700 ($121,180–$801,380) n=1,629
Median gross rent$1,463$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,162 ($782–$2,359) n=1,367
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NY median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth78.8 yr ± 0.6878.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.9 yr (78.0–84.5) n=1,692

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.68 years of 78.8, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured