ZIP code
10119
in New York, New YorkPopulation 0
63.30/ 100
Ranked #2,809 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 8.8%)
Ranked #371 of 1,730 New York ZIPs (top 21%)
Ranked #505 of 853 New York-Newark-Jersey City, NY-NJ ZIPs (bottom 41%)
Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.
What defines this ZIP
Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.
Binge drinking
23%
in the top 1.2% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST98thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.
Full methodology ›Transportation noise
33.9%
in the top 1.0% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST98thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.
Full methodology ›Energy-cost burden
0.59%
in the bottom 0.2% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST1stUS1stDefinition & source ›
The modeled share of household income spent on home energy bills — electricity, gas, and heating fuels.
A modeled share of household income spent on home energy. Estimates that hit the model’s 100% ceiling are suppressed rather than published, because at that point the figure reflects the model’s limit rather than a measured burden.
Full methodology ›Obesity
24.2%
in the bottom 4.4% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST10thUS4thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults with obesity, defined as a body-mass index of 30 or higher.
Full methodology ›Floodplain exposure
0.00%
at the national minimum
Lower is healthier
ST1stUS1stDefinition & source ›
The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 1%-annual-chance floodplain — the “100-year” flood zone, where flooding has about a 1-in-100 chance in any given year.
Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.
Full methodology ›Loud transportation noise
2.7%
in the top 4.5% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST95thUS96thDefinition & source ›
The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 65 decibels — around the volume of normal conversation.
Full methodology ›Hearing disability
4.4%
in the bottom 3.2% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST7thUS3rdDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.
Full methodology ›Tree cover
0.00%
at the national minimum
Higher is healthier
ST1stUS1stDefinition & source ›
The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.
Full methodology ›Tooth loss
4.7%
in the bottom 1.6% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST2ndUS2ndDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults aged 65 and older who have lost all of their natural teeth.
Full methodology ›Mammography
81.3%
in the top 5.8% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST86thUS94thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.
Full methodology ›The read
Judged by its overall standing, ZIP 10119, one of several in New York, New York sits in the top 8.8% healthiest ZIPs nationally (2,809th) and the top 21% of New York (371st), based on limited data; treat as directional.
An even profile, with readings pulling both ways: modeled energy burden stands in the bottom 0.2% nationally, modeled obesity resides in the bottom 4.4% nationally, and floodplain exposure sits at the national minimum. Modeled hearing disability stands in the bottom 3.2% nationally, tooth loss resides in the bottom 1.6% nationally, and mammography sits in the top 5.8% nationally. Against that, modeled binge drinking stands in the top 1.2% nationally, and transportation noise resides in the top 1.0% nationally. Modeled loud transportation noise sits in the top 4.5% nationally, and tree cover stands at the national minimum.
Placed beside its immediate neighbors, walkability runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Put plainly, transportation noise is the modeled share of an area exposed to average road, rail, and air noise at or above 55 decibels. Energy burden is the share of household income that goes to home energy bills. Floodplain exposure is land with about a 1-in-100 chance of flooding each year, nicknamed the "100-year floodplain". A healthier nearby ZIP overall is ZIP 10001, just across the boundary.
What’s driving this score
Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the New York-Newark-Jersey City, NY-NJ metro area.
Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.
Lifting this score
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 93%
21%
Social Need / SDOHPartial
healthier than 88%
16%
Preventive Care
healthier than 80%
13%
Mental Health
healthier than 95%
8%
Disability
healthier than 86%
7%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 87%
5%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 76%
5%
Holding it back
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 5%
14%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 27%
11%
Lifting this score
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 91%
21%
Social Need / SDOHPartial
healthier than 85%
16%
Mental Health
healthier than 80%
8%
Disability
healthier than 66%
7%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 68%
5%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 69%
5%
Holding it back
Environmental Hazard
in the bottom 0.6%
14%
Preventive Care
healthier than 38%
13%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 17%
11%
Lifting this score
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 78%
21%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 80%
5%
About typical
Social Need / SDOHPartial
healthier than 59%
16%
Preventive Care
healthier than 47%
13%
Mental Health
healthier than 46%
8%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 59%
5%
Holding it back
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 5%
14%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 13%
11%
Disability
healthier than 39%
7%
“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›
Nearby & similar ZIPs
Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.
Nearby
10001
New Yorkshares a border
Score 70.80
Closest healthier
10199
New Yorkshares a border
Score 68.44
Similar health profile
17025
Pennsylvania99% similar profile
Score 57.44
How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured
Evidence
Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.
Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Arthritis among adults | 19.2% | 17.4–21.1 |
| High blood pressure among adults | 31.4% | 29.0–34.0 |
| Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults | 5.8% | 5.2–6.4 |
| Current asthma among adults | 9.5% | 8.6–10.7 |
| Coronary heart disease among adults | 5.2% | 4.5–6.2 |
| Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults | 4.2% | 3.2–5.5 |
| Depression among adults | 16.1% | 14.3–18.0 |
| Diagnosed diabetes among adults | 10.5% | 9.1–12.2 |
| High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened | 36.4% | 34.0–39.1 |
| Obesity among adults | 24.2% | 21.4–27.4 |
| Stroke among adults | 3.0% | 2.5–3.6 |
| All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years | 4.7% | 3.7–5.7 |
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years | 7.4% | 4.9–11.6 |
| Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure | 72.9% | 69.9–75.9 |
| Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults | 79.6% | 77.2–81.9 |
| Cholesterol screening among adults | 90.3% | 87.9–92.0 |
| Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years | 70.9% | 67.7–74.1 |
| Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults | 62.5% | 59.8–65.1 |
| Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years | 81.3% | 76.9–85.2 |
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Binge drinking among adults | 23.0% | 20.9–25.7 |
| Current cigarette smoking among adults | 10.0% | 7.2–13.7 |
| No leisure-time physical activity among adults | 19.5% | 15.7–24.0 |
| Short sleep duration among adults | 40.1% | 37.0–43.5 |
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults | 16.7% | 13.4–21.0 |
| Frequent mental distress among adults | 14.0% | 12.0–16.2 |
| Frequent physical distress among adults | 11.4% | 9.5–13.6 |
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Cognitive disability among adults | 10.4% | 8.3–12.8 |
| Any disability among adults | 23.1% | 19.4–27.6 |
| Hearing disability among adults | 4.4% | 3.8–5.2 |
| Independent living disability among adults | 6.4% | 5.1–7.9 |
| Mobility disability among adults | 11.3% | 9.1–13.9 |
| Self-care disability among adults | 3.8% | 3.0–4.8 |
| Vision disability among adults | 4.8% | 3.9–6.0 |
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Lack of social and emotional support among adults | 28.1% | 24.2–32.8 |
| Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 17.0% | 12.2–23.0 |
| Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults | 13.8% | 9.4–19.3 |
| Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 15.9% | 12.1–20.5 |
| Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults | 9.1% | 7.0–11.6 |
| Loneliness among adults | 36.1% | 32.4–40.2 |
| Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults | 9.5% | 7.4–11.9 |
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | NY median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Poverty rate | — | 10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,364 | 9.5% (2.5–22.6%) n=1,734 |
| Uninsured 18–64 | — | 9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,286 | 5.0% (0.0–13.1%) n=1,734 |
| No HS diploma (25+) | — | 7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,505 | 7.1% (1.2–17.5%) n=1,743 |
| Bachelor's or higher (25+) | — | 23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,505 | 31.8% (13.9–62.1%) n=1,743 |
| Unemployment rate (16+) | — | 3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,274 | 4.4% (0.0–9.7%) n=1,730 |
| Households without a vehicle | — | 3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,322 | 5.7% (0.0–28.9%) n=1,730 |
| Broadband subscription | — | 89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,322 | 91.5% (81.1–98.3%) n=1,730 |
| Housing cost burden (≥30% income) | — | 23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,322 | 27.2% (14.2–45.5%) n=1,730 |
| Homeownership rate | — | 78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,322 | 80.2% (40.9–94.8%) n=1,730 |
| Crowded housing (>1 per room) | — | 1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,322 | 1.0% (0.0–6.6%) n=1,730 |
| Foreign-born population | — | 2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,553 | 4.8% (0.0–28.7%) n=1,746 |
| Single-parent households | — | 53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,087 | 54.0% (36.7–74.5%) n=1,716 |
| Population 65+ | — | 19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,553 | 20.0% (12.0–33.2%) n=1,746 |
| Median age | — | 42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,292 | 43.5 yr (34.6–56.1) n=1,733 |
| Median household income | — | $72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318 | $81,837 ($55,470–$145,610) n=1,626 |
| Median home value | — | $222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049 | $247,700 ($121,180–$801,380) n=1,629 |
| Median gross rent | — | $1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670 | $1,162 ($782–$2,359) n=1,367 |
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | NY median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Life expectancy at birth | 81.2 yr ± 3.36 | 78.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,308 | 80.9 yr (78.0–84.5) n=1,692 |
About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 3.36 years of 81.2, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.
More ZIPs to explore ▾More ZIPs to explore ▴
How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured