Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

10069

in New York, New YorkPopulation 6,509

71.50/ 100

Ranked #346 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 1.1%)

Ranked #67 of 1,730 New York ZIPs (top 3.9%)

Ranked #137 of 853 New York-Newark-Jersey City, NY-NJ ZIPs (top 16%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Median household income

$233,636

in the top 0.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The middle household income in this ZIP — half of households earn more, half earn less — in dollars per year.

Full methodology ›

Obesity

16.6%

in the bottom 0.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with obesity, defined as a body-mass index of 30 or higher.

Full methodology ›

Walkability

410 intersections/sq mi

in the top 0.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

Households without a vehicle

69.2%

in the top 0.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of households with no vehicle available.

Full methodology ›

Binge drinking

22.7%

in the top 1.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

High blood pressure

22.6%

in the bottom 1.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST3rd
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.

Full methodology ›

Unemployment rate

21.1%

in the top 1.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The share of the civilian labor force that is unemployed.

Full methodology ›

Energy-cost burden

0.61%

in the bottom 0.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of household income spent on home energy bills — electricity, gas, and heating fuels.

A modeled share of household income spent on home energy. Estimates that hit the model’s 100% ceiling are suppressed rather than published, because at that point the figure reflects the model’s limit rather than a measured burden.

Full methodology ›

Outer-floodplain exposure

19.3%

in the top 2.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 0.2%-annual-chance flood band — the “500-year” zone, a lower but real 1-in-500 yearly chance.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Hearing disability

3.6%

in the bottom 1.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST3rd
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.

Full methodology ›

The read

In its overall standing, ZIP 10069, one of several in New York, New York lands in the top 1.1% healthiest ZIPs nationally (346th) and the top 3.9% of New York (67th).

continue reading

This area's measures are easy to read as a mixed set: household income lies in the top 0.6% nationally, modeled obesity stands in the bottom 0.3% nationally, and walkability rests in the top 0.2% nationally. Modeled high blood pressure registers in the bottom 1.9% nationally, energy burden resides in the bottom 0.2% nationally, and hearing disability settles in the bottom 1.5% nationally. Set against that, households without a vehicle is in the top 0.6% nationally, and modeled binge drinking sits in the top 1.3% nationally. Unemployment lands in the top 1.9% nationally, and outer-floodplain exposure lies in the top 2.0% nationally.

Against the wider neighborhood, walkability runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Put simply, energy burden is the share of household income that goes to home energy bills. Outer-floodplain exposure is land with a lower but real 1-in-500 chance of flooding each year, nicknamed the "500-year floodplain". On the overall standing, ZIP 10023, just across the boundary, ranks healthier.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the New York-Newark-Jersey City, NY-NJ metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 98%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 88%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 86%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 78%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 94%

8%

Disability

in the top 0.7%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 69%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 79%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 33%

14%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 97%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 85%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 75%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 74%

8%

Disability

healthier than 98%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 73%

5%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 51%

13%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 24%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 33%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 96%

21%

Disability

healthier than 95%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 63%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 58%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 47%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 60%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 54%

11%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 52%

5%

Holding it back

Mental Health

healthier than 37%

8%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Heavy environment, light chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 33.6; chronic-disease standing 98.2 (top 10%) — 65 points apart, heavier on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #15,867 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults17.2%15.8–18.9
High blood pressure among adults22.6%20.9–24.6
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults6.7%6.2–7.4
Current asthma among adults9.0%8.2–10.0
Coronary heart disease among adults3.5%3.2–3.9
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults3.0%2.6–3.4
Depression among adults18.5%16.8–20.6
Diagnosed diabetes among adults6.4%5.7–7.3
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened35.0%32.8–37.6
Obesity among adults16.6%14.7–19.0
Stroke among adults1.9%1.7–2.0
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years4.5%3.7–5.5
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years3.4%2.8–4.1
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure70.7%68.1–73.7
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults79.4%77.4–81.5
Cholesterol screening among adults91.0%90.0–92.0
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years67.0%63.7–70.2
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults73.9%71.6–76.1
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years80.9%76.5–84.9
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults22.7%20.7–25.2
Current cigarette smoking among adults6.4%5.3–7.7
No leisure-time physical activity among adults14.8%13.1–16.9
Short sleep duration among adults33.1%30.1–36.1
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults10.3%9.1–11.6
Frequent mental distress among adults13.0%11.8–14.5
Frequent physical distress among adults8.6%7.8–9.7
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults8.0%7.1–9.1
Any disability among adults17.4%15.7–19.3
Hearing disability among adults3.6%3.2–4.0
Independent living disability among adults4.6%4.0–5.2
Mobility disability among adults7.3%6.5–8.3
Self-care disability among adults2.0%1.8–2.2
Vision disability among adults2.8%2.5–3.1
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults23.2%20.7–26.0
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults8.7%7.3–10.4
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults6.6%5.3–8.1
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults8.1%6.9–9.5
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults5.0%4.4–5.7
Loneliness among adults35.0%31.9–38.4
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults4.7%4.0–5.4
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NY median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate25.5%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.5% (2.5–22.6%) n=1,734
Uninsured 18–642.6%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2865.0% (0.0–13.1%) n=1,734
No HS diploma (25+)0.0%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5057.1% (1.2–17.5%) n=1,743
Bachelor's or higher (25+)92.9%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50531.8% (13.9–62.1%) n=1,743
Unemployment rate (16+)21.1%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.4% (0.0–9.7%) n=1,730
Households without a vehicle69.2%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3225.7% (0.0–28.9%) n=1,730
Broadband subscription100.0%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32291.5% (81.1–98.3%) n=1,730
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)37.3%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32227.2% (14.2–45.5%) n=1,730
Homeownership rate28.4%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32280.2% (40.9–94.8%) n=1,730
Crowded housing (>1 per room)2.4%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.0% (0.0–6.6%) n=1,730
Foreign-born population27.6%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5534.8% (0.0–28.7%) n=1,746
Single-parent households38.5%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08754.0% (36.7–74.5%) n=1,716
Population 65+5.7%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.0% (12.0–33.2%) n=1,746
Median age38.6 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.5 yr (34.6–56.1) n=1,733
Median household income$233,636$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$81,837 ($55,470–$145,610) n=1,626
Median home value$2,000,001$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$247,700 ($121,180–$801,380) n=1,629
Median gross rent$3,501$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,162 ($782–$2,359) n=1,367
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NY median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth86.0 yr ± 1.4878.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.9 yr (78.0–84.5) n=1,692

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.48 years of 86.0, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured