Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

10039

in New York, New YorkPopulation 32,492

43.86/ 100

Ranked #23,552 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 27%)

Ranked #1,664 of 1,730 New York ZIPs (bottom 3.9%)

Ranked #824 of 853 New York-Newark-Jersey City, NY-NJ ZIPs (bottom 3.4%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Subsidized affordable housing

2,438 units

in the top 0.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The number of affordable rental units in this ZIP supported by the federal Low-Income Housing Tax Credit program.

Full methodology ›

Households without a vehicle

77.3%

in the top 0.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of households with no vehicle available.

Full methodology ›

Loneliness

44.7%

in the top 0.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report feeling lonely.

Full methodology ›

Walkability

260 intersections/sq mi

in the top 1.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST98th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

Housing insecurity

31%

in the top 1.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced housing insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Homeownership rate

13.7%

in the bottom 1.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST3rd
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes that are owned, rather than rented, by the people living in them.

Full methodology ›

Short sleep

45.4%

in the top 2.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.

Full methodology ›

Vision disability

10.2%

in the top 4.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are blind or have serious difficulty seeing even with glasses.

Full methodology ›

Self-care disability

7.5%

in the top 4.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with difficulty dressing or bathing.

Full methodology ›

Food insecurity

38.8%

in the top 2.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced food insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

The read

ZIP 10039, one of several in New York, New York ranks in the bottom 27% nationally (23,552nd) and the bottom 3.9% of New York (1,664th).

continue reading

The weightiest signals in the profile are worth naming up front: households without a vehicle settles in the top 0.4% nationally, and modeled loneliness rests in the top 0.8% nationally. Modeled housing insecurity lands in the top 1.3% nationally, and homeownership settles in the bottom 1.6% nationally. Modeled short sleep rests in the top 2.6% nationally, vision disability lands in the top 4.5% nationally, and self-care disability settles in the top 4.1% nationally. Modeled food insecurity rests in the top 2.2% nationally. More positively, subsidized affordable housing lands in the top 0.2% nationally, and walkability settles in the top 1.2% nationally.

Against its neighbors, outer-floodplain exposure runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. For context, subsidized affordable housing is the main federal tax-credit program (HUD) funding affordable rental housing, counted as local units it supports. The closest ZIP that ranks healthier overall is ZIP 10030, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the New York-Newark-Jersey City, NY-NJ metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Healthcare Access

healthier than 90%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 49%

21%

Mental Health

healthier than 46%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 57%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 17%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 24%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 35%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 5%

11%

Disability

healthier than 12%

7%

Lifting this score

Healthcare Access

healthier than 90%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 23%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 15%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 14%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 10%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 3%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 9%

8%

Disability

healthier than 2%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 21%

5%

Lifting this score

Healthcare Access

healthier than 87%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 3%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 14%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 34%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 16%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 2%

11%

Mental Health

in the bottom 0.5%

8%

Disability

healthier than 2%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 35%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

2 of our published findings list this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Below its nearby ZIPs

    The ZIP codes that outlive their neighbors

    Estimated life expectancy is 76.1 ± 1.5 years. The 50 nearest ZIP codes with estimates average 80.7 years — 4.6 years below them.

    Ranked #3,259 of the 3,687 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above the nearby-ZIP average, highest first.

  • Highest-risk tenth

    Air toxics and the years between the two ends of the risk scale

    Modeled air-toxics cancer risk is 40.0 cases per million — among the tenth of compared ZIP codes with the most. Estimated life expectancy is 76.1 ± 1.5 years.

    Ranked #504 of the 4,173 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by modeled air-toxics risk, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults24.5%22.9–26.6
High blood pressure among adults37.5%35.5–40.0
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults5.0%4.6–5.5
Current asthma among adults12.6%11.6–14.1
Coronary heart disease among adults6.4%5.8–7.1
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults7.6%6.8–8.5
Depression among adults19.2%17.6–21.5
Diagnosed diabetes among adults15.0%13.7–16.7
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened36.6%34.5–39.2
Obesity among adults30.0%27.3–33.5
Stroke among adults4.9%4.5–5.4
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years23.6%20.2–27.4
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years12.7%11.0–14.5
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure76.1%74.3–78.3
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults81.0%79.2–82.9
Cholesterol screening among adults86.1%84.7–87.5
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years62.3%58.8–65.9
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults48.7%46.0–51.4
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years78.7%73.9–83.0
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults16.9%15.4–18.9
Current cigarette smoking among adults15.9%14.2–18.1
No leisure-time physical activity among adults34.4%31.6–37.8
Short sleep duration among adults45.4%42.1–48.7
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults28.9%26.6–31.8
Frequent mental distress among adults20.0%18.5–22.0
Frequent physical distress among adults16.8%15.3–18.6
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults17.6%16.0–19.6
Any disability among adults36.3%33.7–39.5
Hearing disability among adults4.9%4.4–5.5
Independent living disability among adults13.3%12.1–14.8
Mobility disability among adults21.0%19.2–23.1
Self-care disability among adults7.5%6.9–8.3
Vision disability among adults10.2%9.3–11.2
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults35.8%32.5–39.2
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults38.8%35.1–42.5
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults39.1%35.5–42.9
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults31.0%28.0–34.1
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults18.9%16.9–20.9
Loneliness among adults44.7%41.1–48.2
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults19.9%17.7–22.2
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NY median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate28.5%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.5% (2.5–22.6%) n=1,734
Uninsured 18–6411.4%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2865.0% (0.0–13.1%) n=1,734
No HS diploma (25+)18.9%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5057.1% (1.2–17.5%) n=1,743
Bachelor's or higher (25+)28.2%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50531.8% (13.9–62.1%) n=1,743
Unemployment rate (16+)17.5%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.4% (0.0–9.7%) n=1,730
Households without a vehicle77.3%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3225.7% (0.0–28.9%) n=1,730
Broadband subscription87.8%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32291.5% (81.1–98.3%) n=1,730
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)48.5%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32227.2% (14.2–45.5%) n=1,730
Homeownership rate13.7%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32280.2% (40.9–94.8%) n=1,730
Crowded housing (>1 per room)10.4%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.0% (0.0–6.6%) n=1,730
Foreign-born population23.6%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5534.8% (0.0–28.7%) n=1,746
Single-parent households18.2%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08754.0% (36.7–74.5%) n=1,716
Population 65+11.4%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.0% (12.0–33.2%) n=1,746
Median age38.4 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.5 yr (34.6–56.1) n=1,733
Median household income$45,371$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$81,837 ($55,470–$145,610) n=1,626
Median home value$497,600$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$247,700 ($121,180–$801,380) n=1,629
Median gross rent$1,200$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,162 ($782–$2,359) n=1,367
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NY median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth76.1 yr ± 0.7678.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.9 yr (78.0–84.5) n=1,692

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.76 years of 76.1, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured