Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

08829

in High Bridge, New JerseyPopulation 3,580

64.21/ 100

Ranked #2,341 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 7.4%)

Ranked #267 of 583 New Jersey ZIPs (top 46%)

Ranked #460 of 853 New York-Newark-Jersey City, NY-NJ ZIPs (bottom 46%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Industrial-pollution burden

in the top 1.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

64.3%

in the top 6.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST54th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Mobility disability

8.7%

in the bottom 4.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST22nd
US5th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.

Full methodology ›

Hearing disability

4.9%

in the bottom 5.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST20th
US6th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.

Full methodology ›

Lack of transportation

5.0%

in the bottom 7.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST34th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who lacked reliable transportation in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Diabetes

8.1%

in the bottom 4.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST12th
US5th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been diagnosed with diabetes.

Full methodology ›

Independent-living disability

5.4%

in the bottom 4.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST33rd
US5th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have difficulty doing errands alone, such as visiting a doctor’s office, because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition.

Full methodology ›

Home broadband subscription

97.7%

in the top 8.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST85th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.

Full methodology ›

Obesity

27.4%

in the bottom 10.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST44th
US10th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with obesity, defined as a body-mass index of 30 or higher.

Full methodology ›

Stroke

2.4%

in the bottom 5.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST13th
US5th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.

Full methodology ›

The read

On balance, and by the composite measure, High Bridge, New Jersey (ZIP 08829) ranks in the top 7.4% healthiest ZIPs nationally (2,341st) and the top 46% of New Jersey (267th).

continue reading

Strengths and concerns sit side by side across the measures here: modeled mobility disability is in the bottom 4.7% nationally, and hearing disability stands in the bottom 5.7% nationally. Modeled transportation settles in the bottom 7.6% nationally, and diabetes lies in the bottom 4.6% nationally. Modeled independent living disability resides in the bottom 4.8% nationally, home broadband subscription lands in the top 8.1% nationally, and modeled obesity registers in the bottom 10.0% nationally. Modeled stroke sits in the bottom 5.4% nationally. On the other hand, modeled industrial-pollution burden rests in the top 1.3% nationally, and pfas is in the top 6.3% nationally.

Compared with the ZIPs it borders, industrial-pollution burden runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In plainer terms, industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. Pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. For a healthier nearby ZIP overall, look to ZIP 08801, just across the boundary. The area additionally sits on the healthier half of the national range on at least seven of the ten good-life measures tracked here, from quiet and green space to nearby care, a combination reached by about one in twenty-five US ZIP codes.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the New York-Newark-Jersey City, NY-NJ metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 92%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 82%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 62%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 77%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 89%

8%

Disability

healthier than 96%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 67%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 21%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 26%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 77%

21%

Disability

healthier than 73%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 67%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 44%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 40%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 53%

11%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 31%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 32%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 5%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 75%

21%

Disability

healthier than 71%

7%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 49%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 53%

11%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 50%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 28%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 31%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 19%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 2%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Heavy environment, light chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 20.9; chronic-disease standing 92.4 (top 10%) — 72 points apart, heavier on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #16,534 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults22.1%19.4–25.1
High blood pressure among adults28.4%25.0–32.0
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults8.2%7.4–9.2
Current asthma among adults9.1%8.0–10.3
Coronary heart disease among adults4.7%4.1–5.5
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults4.5%3.6–5.5
Depression among adults17.9%15.2–21.0
Diagnosed diabetes among adults8.1%6.8–9.5
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened36.8%32.9–40.8
Obesity among adults27.4%22.1–33.2
Stroke among adults2.4%2.1–2.8
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years7.5%5.9–9.4
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years7.0%5.5–8.9
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure75.0%71.4–78.3
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults76.6%73.0–79.9
Cholesterol screening among adults90.1%88.4–91.8
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years64.7%59.7–69.8
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults68.8%65.5–72.1
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years76.2%68.7–83.1
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults18.3%15.2–21.6
Current cigarette smoking among adults10.1%7.8–12.9
No leisure-time physical activity among adults19.0%15.4–23.4
Short sleep duration among adults33.9%28.5–40.2
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults13.2%11.0–16.0
Frequent mental distress among adults14.8%12.8–17.0
Frequent physical distress among adults11.0%9.5–12.9
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults10.4%8.7–12.4
Any disability among adults21.5%18.1–25.4
Hearing disability among adults4.9%4.2–5.7
Independent living disability among adults5.4%4.5–6.5
Mobility disability among adults8.7%7.1–10.6
Self-care disability among adults2.4%2.0–2.9
Vision disability among adults3.0%2.6–3.6
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults21.0%17.6–24.9
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults8.4%6.3–10.7
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults4.5%3.2–5.9
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults8.0%6.3–9.9
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults5.0%4.1–6.0
Loneliness among adults32.4%27.7–37.2
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults4.7%3.8–5.7
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NJ median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate3.4%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3645.8% (1.8–16.1%) n=588
Uninsured 18–644.8%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2865.6% (1.2–16.1%) n=585
No HS diploma (25+)2.0%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.3% (1.4–15.4%) n=589
Bachelor's or higher (25+)49.3%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50544.2% (20.0–72.5%) n=589
Unemployment rate (16+)5.9%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2745.3% (2.5–9.7%) n=583
Households without a vehicle1.7%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.8% (0.8–17.6%) n=585
Broadband subscription97.7%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32294.4% (88.0–98.5%) n=585
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)32.3%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32231.7% (22.1–46.5%) n=585
Homeownership rate84.2%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32277.5% (39.3–94.9%) n=585
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.4% (0.0–7.4%) n=585
Foreign-born population15.6%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,55313.7% (3.3–39.5%) n=590
Single-parent households32.7%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08749.6% (35.2–64.9%) n=581
Population 65+11.9%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55317.8% (11.7–27.5%) n=590
Median age38.9 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.0 yr (35.6–51.8) n=582
Median household income$112,467$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$111,711 ($68,311–$188,075) n=565
Median home value$336,500$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$449,450 ($250,890–$845,440) n=564
Median gross rent$1,831$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,781 ($1,267–$2,530) n=516
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NJ median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth82.8 yr ± 2.5578.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.4 yr (76.6–83.7) n=571

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 2.55 years of 82.8, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured