Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

08736

in Manasquan, New JerseyPopulation 13,223

72.79/ 100

Ranked #192 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 0.6%)

Ranked #46 of 583 New Jersey ZIPs (top 7.9%)

Ranked #80 of 853 New York-Newark-Jersey City, NY-NJ ZIPs (top 9.4%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Broad coverage across health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Median household income

$174,097

in the top 2.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST86th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The middle household income in this ZIP — half of households earn more, half earn less — in dollars per year.

Full methodology ›

Loneliness

25.4%

in the bottom 0.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST3rd
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report feeling lonely.

Full methodology ›

Food insecurity

5.6%

in the bottom 0.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST5th
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced food insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Lack of transportation

3.8%

in the bottom 1.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST8th
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who lacked reliable transportation in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Housing insecurity

5.3%

in the bottom 1.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST5th
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced housing insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Dental provider access

1.8 per 1,000 residents

in the top 1.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST96th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The number of dental offices located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Utility shut-off threat

3.5%

in the bottom 1.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST11th
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults whose household was threatened with a utility shut-off in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Cognitive disability

8.5%

in the bottom 1.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST16th
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions.

Full methodology ›

Natural-disaster risk

in the top 3.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US97th
Definition & source ›

This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a Superfund site

0.1 mi

in the bottom 4.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST17th
US4th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

The read

In its overall standing, Manasquan, New Jersey (ZIP 08736) lands in the top 0.6% healthiest ZIPs nationally (192nd) and the top 7.9% of New Jersey (46th), based on limited data; treat as directional.

continue reading

This area's measures are easy to read as a mixed set: household income sits in the top 2.0% nationally, modeled loneliness lands in the bottom 0.6% nationally, and modeled food insecurity lies in the bottom 0.9% nationally. Modeled transportation stands in the bottom 1.0% nationally, modeled housing insecurity rests in the bottom 1.1% nationally, and dental providers registers in the top 1.5% nationally. Modeled utility shutoff resides in the bottom 1.6% nationally, and cognitive disability settles in the bottom 1.2% nationally. Set against that, modeled disaster risk is in the top 3.4% nationally, and distance to a Superfund site sits in the bottom 4.0% nationally.

Against the wider neighborhood, park land runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Put simply, disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. Distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. On the overall standing, ZIP 07746, about 12 miles away, ranks healthier. In the round, the area also sits on the healthier half of the national range on at least seven of the ten good-life measures tracked here, from quiet and green space to nearby care, a combination reached by about one in twenty-five US ZIP codes.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the New York-Newark-Jersey City, NY-NJ metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 84%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

in the top 0.9%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 65%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 97%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 97%

11%

Mental Health

in the top 0.9%

8%

Disability

healthier than 97%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 60%

5%

Nothing measured is holding this score back.

Not placed: Climate / Disaster Risk — too little of each is measured here to compare reliably. They still count toward the score (together 5% of it); we just will not publish a standing we cannot stand behind.

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 94%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 86%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 97%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 96%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 87%

8%

Disability

healthier than 79%

7%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 45%

21%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 45%

5%

Nothing measured is holding this score back.

Not placed: Climate / Disaster Risk — too little of each is measured here to compare reliably. They still count toward the score (together 5% of it); we just will not publish a standing we cannot stand behind.

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 96%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 86%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 90%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 96%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 86%

8%

Disability

healthier than 76%

7%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 40%

21%

Holding it back

Healthcare Access

healthier than 28%

5%

Not placed: Climate / Disaster Risk — too little of each is measured here to compare reliably. They still count toward the score (together 5% of it); we just will not publish a standing we cannot stand behind.

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults25.5%23.0–28.0
High blood pressure among adults32.6%29.7–35.5
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.7%9.8–11.7
Current asthma among adults8.7%7.7–9.7
Coronary heart disease among adults5.7%5.1–6.4
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults4.5%3.9–5.1
Depression among adults14.3%12.3–16.4
Diagnosed diabetes among adults8.7%7.6–9.9
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened40.9%37.7–44.1
Obesity among adults28.2%24.4–32.3
Stroke among adults2.7%2.5–3.0
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years5.4%4.3–6.6
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years5.0%4.1–5.9
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure80.3%77.7–82.7
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults80.8%78.3–83.2
Cholesterol screening among adults92.2%91.1–93.2
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years72.5%68.8–76.0
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults78.5%76.1–80.7
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years79.7%74.3–84.6
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults16.4%14.1–18.8
Current cigarette smoking among adults7.5%6.3–8.9
No leisure-time physical activity among adults15.8%13.4–18.4
Short sleep duration among adults29.0%25.3–32.9
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults11.3%9.8–13.0
Frequent mental distress among adults12.2%10.7–13.7
Frequent physical distress among adults9.9%8.7–11.2
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults8.5%7.4–9.6
Any disability among adults20.1%17.6–22.9
Hearing disability among adults5.9%5.3–6.7
Independent living disability among adults4.8%4.2–5.5
Mobility disability among adults8.7%7.4–10.0
Self-care disability among adults2.3%2.0–2.6
Vision disability among adults2.9%2.6–3.2
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults15.8%13.6–18.2
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults5.6%4.5–6.7
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults3.1%2.5–3.8
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults5.3%4.5–6.3
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults3.8%3.2–4.3
Loneliness among adults25.4%22.4–28.8
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults3.5%3.0–4.1
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NJ median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate3.7%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3645.8% (1.8–16.1%) n=588
Uninsured 18–643.3%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2865.6% (1.2–16.1%) n=585
No HS diploma (25+)1.4%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.3% (1.4–15.4%) n=589
Bachelor's or higher (25+)68.9%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50544.2% (20.0–72.5%) n=589
Unemployment rate (16+)6.8%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2745.3% (2.5–9.7%) n=583
Households without a vehicle1.6%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.8% (0.8–17.6%) n=585
Broadband subscription96.0%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32294.4% (88.0–98.5%) n=585
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)26.7%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32231.7% (22.1–46.5%) n=585
Homeownership rate88.5%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32277.5% (39.3–94.9%) n=585
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.8%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.4% (0.0–7.4%) n=585
Foreign-born population5.1%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,55313.7% (3.3–39.5%) n=590
Single-parent households56.2%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08749.6% (35.2–64.9%) n=581
Population 65+20.7%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55317.8% (11.7–27.5%) n=590
Median age46.9 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.0 yr (35.6–51.8) n=582
Median household income$174,097$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$111,711 ($68,311–$188,075) n=565
Median home value$880,900$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$449,450 ($250,890–$845,440) n=564
Median gross rent$2,102$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,781 ($1,267–$2,530) n=516
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NJ median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy unavailable for this ZIP — fewer than 80% of the census tracts that make it up could be matched across the 2010→2020 tract-boundary revision, so no value is published rather than an unreliable one. See how coverage gaps are handled.
More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured