ZIP code
08515
in Chesterfield, New JerseyPopulation 8,373
71.36/ 100
Ranked #363 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 1.2%)
Ranked #79 of 583 New Jersey ZIPs (top 13.6%)
Ranked #9 of 361 Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington, PA-NJ-DE-MD ZIPs (top 2.5%)
Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.
What defines this ZIP
Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.
Median household income
$208,836
in the top 0.9% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST93rdUS99thDefinition & source ›
The middle household income in this ZIP — half of households earn more, half earn less — in dollars per year.
Full methodology ›Mobility disability
7.0%
in the bottom 1.9% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST5thUS2ndDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.
Full methodology ›Loneliness
27%
in the bottom 3.1% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST8thUS3rdDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who report feeling lonely.
Full methodology ›Cognitive disability
8.6%
in the bottom 1.4% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST17thUS1stDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions.
Full methodology ›Independent-living disability
4.3%
in the bottom 0.7% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST7thUS1stDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have difficulty doing errands alone, such as visiting a doctor’s office, because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition.
Full methodology ›Hearing disability
4.2%
in the bottom 2.6% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST5thUS3rdDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.
Full methodology ›Obesity
25.3%
in the bottom 6.0% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST28thUS6thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults with obesity, defined as a body-mass index of 30 or higher.
Full methodology ›Coronary heart disease
3.9%
in the bottom 3.0% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST4thUS3rdDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.
Full methodology ›Stroke
2.1%
in the bottom 2.8% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST4thUS3rdDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.
Full methodology ›Lack of transportation
4.7%
in the bottom 5.1% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST26thUS5thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who lacked reliable transportation in the past 12 months.
Full methodology ›The read
On balance, and by the composite measure, Chesterfield, New Jersey (ZIP 08515) ranks in the top 1.2% healthiest ZIPs nationally (363rd) and the top 13.6% of New Jersey (79th).
Strengths and concerns sit side by side across the measures here: household income lands in the top 0.9% nationally, and modeled mobility disability registers in the bottom 1.9% nationally. Modeled loneliness sits in the bottom 3.1% nationally, and cognitive disability rests in the bottom 1.4% nationally. Modeled independent living disability is in the bottom 0.7% nationally, hearing disability stands in the bottom 2.6% nationally, and obesity settles in the bottom 6.0% nationally. Modeled coronary heart disease lies in the bottom 3.0% nationally, stroke resides in the bottom 2.8% nationally, and transportation lands in the bottom 5.1% nationally.
Compared with the ZIPs it borders, park land runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. For a healthier nearby ZIP overall, look to ZIP 08550, about 5.3 miles away.
What’s driving this score
Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington, PA-NJ-DE-MD metro area.
Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.
Lifting this score
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 96%
21%
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 94%
16%
Preventive Care
healthier than 80%
13%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 88%
11%
Mental Health
healthier than 98%
8%
Disability
in the top 0.8%
7%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 62%
5%
About typical
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 43%
14%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 43%
5%
Nothing measured is holding this score back.
Lifting this score
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 93%
21%
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 67%
16%
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 63%
14%
Preventive Care
healthier than 60%
13%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 73%
11%
Mental Health
healthier than 78%
8%
Disability
healthier than 94%
7%
About typical
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 56%
5%
Holding it back
Healthcare Access
healthier than 15%
5%
Lifting this score
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 98%
21%
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 85%
16%
Preventive Care
healthier than 76%
13%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 92%
11%
Mental Health
healthier than 99%
8%
Disability
in the top 0.00%
7%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 71%
5%
About typical
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 58%
14%
Holding it back
Healthcare Access
healthier than 13%
5%
“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›
Findings that name this ZIP
One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.
Heavy environment, light chronic burden
Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions
Environmental-hazard standing 43.0; chronic-disease standing 96.3 (top 10%) — 53 points apart, heavier on the environment than it is on chronic illness.
Ranked #14,729 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.
Nearby & similar ZIPs
Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.
Nearby
08022
New Jerseyshares a border
Score 65.07
Closest healthier
08550
New Jerseyabout 5.3 mi away
Score 79.46
Similar health profile
08801
New Jersey100% similar profile
Score 70.36
How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured
Evidence
Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.
Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Arthritis among adults | 20.3% | 18.1–22.6 |
| High blood pressure among adults | 27.8% | 24.9–30.7 |
| Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults | 7.0% | 6.4–7.8 |
| Current asthma among adults | 8.2% | 7.3–9.3 |
| Coronary heart disease among adults | 3.9% | 3.4–4.4 |
| Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults | 3.5% | 2.8–4.2 |
| Depression among adults | 14.6% | 12.6–16.8 |
| Diagnosed diabetes among adults | 8.0% | 6.9–9.3 |
| High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened | 38.3% | 35.0–41.6 |
| Obesity among adults | 25.3% | 21.6–29.4 |
| Stroke among adults | 2.1% | 1.8–2.3 |
| All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years | 5.3% | 4.2–6.5 |
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years | 5.5% | 4.4–6.9 |
| Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure | 74.1% | 70.7–77.2 |
| Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults | 79.1% | 76.0–81.8 |
| Cholesterol screening among adults | 91.1% | 89.6–92.4 |
| Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years | 66.1% | 62.0–69.8 |
| Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults | 72.3% | 69.3–75.0 |
| Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years | 77.6% | 71.2–82.9 |
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Binge drinking among adults | 16.6% | 14.1–19.2 |
| Current cigarette smoking among adults | 8.5% | 6.6–10.7 |
| No leisure-time physical activity among adults | 18.6% | 15.5–21.9 |
| Short sleep duration among adults | 33.2% | 28.9–37.6 |
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults | 11.4% | 9.5–13.5 |
| Frequent mental distress among adults | 13.0% | 11.3–14.8 |
| Frequent physical distress among adults | 9.7% | 8.3–11.1 |
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Cognitive disability among adults | 8.6% | 7.2–10.0 |
| Any disability among adults | 18.3% | 15.6–21.2 |
| Hearing disability among adults | 4.2% | 3.6–4.7 |
| Independent living disability among adults | 4.3% | 3.6–5.1 |
| Mobility disability among adults | 7.0% | 5.9–8.4 |
| Self-care disability among adults | 2.0% | 1.7–2.4 |
| Vision disability among adults | 2.7% | 2.4–3.1 |
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Lack of social and emotional support among adults | 20.8% | 17.8–24.1 |
| Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 7.5% | 5.9–9.4 |
| Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults | 3.8% | 2.8–5.0 |
| Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 7.1% | 5.8–8.7 |
| Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults | 4.7% | 3.9–5.6 |
| Loneliness among adults | 27.0% | 23.5–30.8 |
| Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults | 4.3% | 3.6–5.2 |
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | NJ median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Poverty rate | 2.8% | 10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,364 | 5.8% (1.8–16.1%) n=588 |
| Uninsured 18–64 | 1.8% | 9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,286 | 5.6% (1.2–16.1%) n=585 |
| No HS diploma (25+) | 3.9% | 7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,505 | 5.3% (1.4–15.4%) n=589 |
| Bachelor's or higher (25+) | 65.3% | 23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,505 | 44.2% (20.0–72.5%) n=589 |
| Unemployment rate (16+) | 3.4% | 3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,274 | 5.3% (2.5–9.7%) n=583 |
| Households without a vehicle | 0.0% | 3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,322 | 4.8% (0.8–17.6%) n=585 |
| Broadband subscription | 99.1% | 89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,322 | 94.4% (88.0–98.5%) n=585 |
| Housing cost burden (≥30% income) | 22.2% | 23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,322 | 31.7% (22.1–46.5%) n=585 |
| Homeownership rate | 96.2% | 78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,322 | 77.5% (39.3–94.9%) n=585 |
| Crowded housing (>1 per room) | 2.2% | 1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,322 | 1.4% (0.0–7.4%) n=585 |
| Foreign-born population | 22.4% | 2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,553 | 13.7% (3.3–39.5%) n=590 |
| Single-parent households | 36.6% | 53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,087 | 49.6% (35.2–64.9%) n=581 |
| Population 65+ | 11.8% | 19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,553 | 17.8% (11.7–27.5%) n=590 |
| Median age | 39.3 yr | 42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,292 | 42.0 yr (35.6–51.8) n=582 |
| Median household income | $208,836 | $72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318 | $111,711 ($68,311–$188,075) n=565 |
| Median home value | $560,000 | $222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049 | $449,450 ($250,890–$845,440) n=564 |
| Median gross rent | $2,500 | $1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670 | $1,781 ($1,267–$2,530) n=516 |
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | NJ median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Life expectancy at birth | 84.2 yr ± 2.05 | 78.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,308 | 80.4 yr (76.6–83.7) n=571 |
About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 2.05 years of 84.2, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.
More ZIPs to explore ▾More ZIPs to explore ▴
How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured