Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

08361

in Vineland, New JerseyPopulation 18,206

57.41/ 100

Ranked #6,871 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 21%)

Ranked #424 of 583 New Jersey ZIPs (bottom 27%)

Ranked #1 of 18 Vineland, NJ ZIPs (top 5.6%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Nitrate in drinking water

13.2%

in the top 2.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of this area’s domestic-well groundwater at or above the federal nitrate limit of 10 milligrams per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Lead in tap water

0 ppb

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

US1st
Definition & source ›

The lead level at the 90th percentile of tap-water samples reported by the public water systems serving this ZIP, in parts per billion — the EPA requires action above 15 ppb.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a Superfund site

0.4 mi

in the bottom 5.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST24th
US5th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

60.7%

in the top 7.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST48th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Arsenic in groundwater

1.5%

in the bottom 14.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST5th
US14th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Industrial-pollution burden

in the bottom 23% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST9th
US23rd
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

The read

In overall standing, ZIP 08361, one of several in Vineland, New Jersey comes out in the top 21% healthiest ZIPs nationally (6,871st) and the bottom 27% of New Jersey (424th).

continue reading

The data is generous to this ZIP in several places worth naming: lead in tap water lies at the national minimum. Distance to a community health center sits at the national minimum, shared with about 23% of ZIPs. Distance to a nursing home settles at the national minimum, shared with about 27% of ZIPs. Modeled arsenic registers in the bottom 14.1% nationally, and elder services stands in the top 14.4% nationally. Working the other way, modeled nitrate lands in the top 2.8% nationally, and distance to a Superfund site is in the bottom 5.3% nationally. Modeled pfas resides in the top 7.7% nationally, and PFOA in drinking water rests in the top 13.0% nationally. PFOS in drinking water lies in the top 13.6% nationally.

Relative to the ZIPs around it, park land runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In plain terms, nitrate is a groundwater compound from fertilizer, manure, and sewage, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Lead in tap water is the EPA trigger, 15 parts per billion in tap samples, above which a water system must act on lead. Distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. The nearest healthier ZIP overall is ZIP 08341, about 0.7 miles away.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Vineland, NJ metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 64%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 64%

16%

Mental Health

healthier than 92%

8%

Disability

healthier than 69%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 87%

5%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 55%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 59%

11%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 59%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 40%

14%

Lifting this score

Healthcare Access

healthier than 89%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 59%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 42%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 50%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 11%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 26%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 33%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 34%

11%

Disability

healthier than 21%

7%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 65%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

in the top 0.00%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 88%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 94%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 88%

8%

Disability

healthier than 88%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 82%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 88%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 18%

14%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Below what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 78.6 ± 1.2 years. A median household income of $99,050 predicts 80.0 years — 1.5 years below.

    Ranked #1,807 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults26.7%23.6–29.9
High blood pressure among adults37.5%33.5–41.4
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.1%8.2–9.9
Current asthma among adults9.4%8.3–10.6
Coronary heart disease among adults6.7%6.0–7.5
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults6.4%5.7–7.3
Depression among adults16.0%13.4–18.7
Diagnosed diabetes among adults11.7%10.1–13.4
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened40.9%36.7–45.1
Obesity among adults35.1%28.8–41.5
Stroke among adults3.6%3.3–3.9
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years11.1%8.9–13.4
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years11.5%9.9–13.2
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure78.8%75.8–81.4
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults79.1%75.7–82.2
Cholesterol screening among adults89.7%88.1–90.9
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years63.7%58.7–68.4
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults64.7%61.3–68.0
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years75.1%67.7–81.6
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults14.7%12.1–17.6
Current cigarette smoking among adults12.4%10.6–14.4
No leisure-time physical activity among adults25.8%21.9–29.9
Short sleep duration among adults38.9%33.1–45.0
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults18.9%16.5–21.3
Frequent mental distress among adults15.2%13.4–17.1
Frequent physical distress among adults13.9%12.2–15.6
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults12.3%10.8–13.8
Any disability among adults26.7%23.0–30.4
Hearing disability among adults6.7%5.9–7.6
Independent living disability among adults7.5%6.6–8.4
Mobility disability among adults13.4%11.6–15.2
Self-care disability among adults3.8%3.5–4.2
Vision disability among adults5.1%4.7–5.6
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults22.3%19.2–25.7
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults13.9%12.0–16.1
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults8.7%7.4–10.1
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults11.9%10.4–13.7
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults7.4%6.5–8.4
Loneliness among adults31.5%27.1–36.2
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults6.9%6.0–8.0
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NJ median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate9.0%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3645.8% (1.8–16.1%) n=588
Uninsured 18–648.0%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2865.6% (1.2–16.1%) n=585
No HS diploma (25+)12.2%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.3% (1.4–15.4%) n=589
Bachelor's or higher (25+)39.5%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50544.2% (20.0–72.5%) n=589
Unemployment rate (16+)4.2%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2745.3% (2.5–9.7%) n=583
Households without a vehicle4.6%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.8% (0.8–17.6%) n=585
Broadband subscription92.2%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32294.4% (88.0–98.5%) n=585
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)30.9%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32231.7% (22.1–46.5%) n=585
Homeownership rate83.0%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32277.5% (39.3–94.9%) n=585
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.3%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.4% (0.0–7.4%) n=585
Foreign-born population11.1%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,55313.7% (3.3–39.5%) n=590
Single-parent households51.6%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08749.6% (35.2–64.9%) n=581
Population 65+22.5%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55317.8% (11.7–27.5%) n=590
Median age44.5 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.0 yr (35.6–51.8) n=582
Median household income$99,050$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$111,711 ($68,311–$188,075) n=565
Median home value$285,900$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$449,450 ($250,890–$845,440) n=564
Median gross rent$1,379$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,781 ($1,267–$2,530) n=516
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NJ median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth78.6 yr ± 0.6078.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.4 yr (76.6–83.7) n=571

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.60 years of 78.6, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured