Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

08224

in New Gretna, New JerseyPopulation 223

50.91/ 100

Ranked #14,987 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 47%)

Ranked #517 of 583 New Jersey ZIPs (bottom 11.4%)

Ranked #281 of 361 Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington, PA-NJ-DE-MD ZIPs (bottom 22%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Floodplain exposure

68.9%

in the top 1.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 1%-annual-chance floodplain — the “100-year” flood zone, where flooding has about a 1-in-100 chance in any given year.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility

31.1 mi

in the top 1.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest facility that handles enough hazardous chemicals to require an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases.

Full methodology ›

Poverty rate

0.00%

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The share of residents whose income is below the federal poverty line, from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey.

Full methodology ›

Homeownership rate

100%

at the national maximum

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes that are owned, rather than rented, by the people living in them.

Full methodology ›

Expected annual disaster loss

$0

in the bottom 2.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US3rd
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

Home broadband subscription

100%

at the national maximum

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.

Full methodology ›

Outer-floodplain exposure

13.1%

in the top 3.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 0.2%-annual-chance flood band — the “500-year” zone, a lower but real 1-in-500 yearly chance.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Housing-cost burden

48.3%

in the top 3.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US96th
Definition & source ›

The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.

Full methodology ›

Natural-disaster risk

in the bottom 6.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST2nd
US6th
Definition & source ›

This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.

Full methodology ›

Industrial-pollution burden

in the bottom 8.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST5th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

The read

New Gretna, New Jersey (ZIP 08224), overall, ranks in the top 47% healthiest ZIPs nationally (14,987th) and the bottom 11.4% of New Jersey (517th).

continue reading

Taken together, the data gives a genuinely mixed reading: distance to a hazardous-chemical facility lies in the top 1.8% nationally, poverty stands at the national minimum, and homeownership rests at the national maximum. Modeled expected annual loss registers in the bottom 2.6% nationally, home broadband subscription resides at the national maximum, and modeled disaster risk settles in the bottom 6.4% nationally. Households without a vehicle is at the national minimum, shared with about 16% of ZIPs. On the other side, floodplain exposure sits in the top 1.8% nationally, and outer-floodplain exposure lands in the top 3.0% nationally. Housing-cost burden lies in the top 3.7% nationally.

Measured against the nearby ZIPs, outer-floodplain exposure runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Defined simply, distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is a plant handling large amounts of hazardous chemicals that must file an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases. Expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. Disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. ZIP 08087, just across the boundary, comes out healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington, PA-NJ-DE-MD metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 64%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 78%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 77%

8%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 48%

21%

Preventive Care

healthier than 58%

13%

Disability

healthier than 47%

7%

Holding it back

Risk Behavior

healthier than 37%

11%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 6%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 32%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 93%

14%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 4%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 26%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 37%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 18%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 13%

8%

Disability

healthier than 10%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

in the bottom 1.0%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 7%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 98%

14%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 48%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 49%

8%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 12%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 36%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 27%

11%

Disability

healthier than 10%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 3%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 6%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults30.6%27.6–33.8
High blood pressure among adults38.3%34.8–42.0
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.3%8.4–10.4
Current asthma among adults9.6%8.5–11.0
Coronary heart disease among adults7.7%6.6–8.8
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults8.7%7.0–10.7
Depression among adults18.1%15.5–20.9
Diagnosed diabetes among adults12.4%10.6–14.4
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened44.1%40.6–47.7
Obesity among adults33.5%29.0–38.5
Stroke among adults4.0%3.4–4.6
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years11.4%9.2–13.7
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years10.6%7.9–13.9
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure78.2%75.2–81.1
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults78.2%75.2–81.2
Cholesterol screening among adults88.2%86.1–90.1
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years71.0%66.6–75.0
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults62.7%59.2–65.8
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years73.9%66.8–79.9
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults16.4%14.0–19.1
Current cigarette smoking among adults17.5%13.6–21.6
No leisure-time physical activity among adults29.7%24.7–35.0
Short sleep duration among adults33.9%29.4–38.2
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults21.6%17.7–25.9
Frequent mental distress among adults17.2%14.9–19.7
Frequent physical distress among adults16.6%14.1–19.4
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults14.4%11.9–17.1
Any disability among adults31.6%26.9–36.6
Hearing disability among adults7.8%6.8–8.9
Independent living disability among adults8.6%7.0–10.3
Mobility disability among adults15.1%12.4–18.2
Self-care disability among adults4.6%3.7–5.5
Vision disability among adults5.5%4.6–6.6
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults22.6%19.0–26.2
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults14.4%10.8–18.4
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults10.0%7.4–13.1
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults11.6%9.1–14.1
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults8.0%6.4–9.6
Loneliness among adults28.7%24.9–32.9
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults7.4%6.0–8.8
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NJ median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate0.0%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3645.8% (1.8–16.1%) n=588
Uninsured 18–642.6%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2865.6% (1.2–16.1%) n=585
No HS diploma (25+)0.7%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.3% (1.4–15.4%) n=589
Bachelor's or higher (25+)21.7%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50544.2% (20.0–72.5%) n=589
Unemployment rate (16+)3.4%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2745.3% (2.5–9.7%) n=583
Households without a vehicle0.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.8% (0.8–17.6%) n=585
Broadband subscription100.0%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32294.4% (88.0–98.5%) n=585
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)48.3%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32231.7% (22.1–46.5%) n=585
Homeownership rate100.0%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32277.5% (39.3–94.9%) n=585
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.4% (0.0–7.4%) n=585
Foreign-born population0.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,55313.7% (3.3–39.5%) n=590
Single-parent households75.0%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08749.6% (35.2–64.9%) n=581
Population 65+13.5%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55317.8% (11.7–27.5%) n=590
Median age35.1 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.0 yr (35.6–51.8) n=582
Median household income$96,250$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$111,711 ($68,311–$188,075) n=565
Median home value$387,500$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$449,450 ($250,890–$845,440) n=564
Median gross rent$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,781 ($1,267–$2,530) n=516
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NJ median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth81.2 yr ± 1.7078.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.4 yr (76.6–83.7) n=571

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.70 years of 81.2, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured