Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

08069

in Penns Grove, New JerseyPopulation 13,413

42.78/ 100

Ranked #24,570 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 23%)

Ranked #566 of 583 New Jersey ZIPs (bottom 3.0%)

Ranked #324 of 361 Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington, PA-NJ-DE-MD ZIPs (bottom 10.3%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Short sleep

45.4%

in the top 2.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.

Full methodology ›

Outer-floodplain exposure

9.9%

in the top 3.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 0.2%-annual-chance flood band — the “500-year” zone, a lower but real 1-in-500 yearly chance.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

71.6%

in the top 4.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST66th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Households without a vehicle

18.1%

in the top 5.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST90th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The share of households with no vehicle available.

Full methodology ›

Transit access

4.5 per 1,000 residents

in the top 6.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST92nd
US94th
Definition & source ›

The number of public-transit stops inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

39.8 per million

in the top 6.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a Superfund site

1.4 mi

in the bottom 8.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST41st
US9th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

Housing insecurity

19.9%

in the top 9.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST90th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced housing insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Industrial-pollution burden

in the top 9.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

Floodplain exposure

30.2%

in the top 10.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST84th
US90th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 1%-annual-chance floodplain — the “100-year” flood zone, where flooding has about a 1-in-100 chance in any given year.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Cross-source signals

Combined exposures in this ZIP

More than one environmental exposure stands out in this ZIP. Each is established independently and shown on its own above; they are grouped here for context — not because one causes the other.

The read

Penns Grove, New Jersey (ZIP 08069), in overall standing, comes out in the bottom 23% nationally (24,570th) and the bottom 3.0% of New Jersey (566th).

continue reading

A balanced showing across the data, with a few readings each side: transit sits in the top 6.1% nationally. On the other hand, modeled short sleep stands in the top 2.6% nationally, outer-floodplain exposure resides in the top 3.8% nationally, and modeled pfas sits in the top 4.0% nationally. Households without a vehicle stands in the top 5.3% nationally, and modeled air-toxics cancer risk resides in the top 6.8% nationally. Distance to a Superfund site sits in the bottom 8.6% nationally, and modeled housing insecurity stands in the top 9.1% nationally. Modeled industrial-pollution burden resides in the top 9.5% nationally. Fiber broadband sits at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs.

Set within its surrounding area, outer-floodplain exposure runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Defined simply, for reference, pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. Air-toxics cancer risk is a modeled EPA estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air, per million people. Distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. The closest healthier ZIP overall is ZIP 08023, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington, PA-NJ-DE-MD metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Mental Health

healthier than 69%

8%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 41%

21%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 60%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 8%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 18%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 23%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 9%

11%

Disability

healthier than 26%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 22%

5%

Nothing measured is lifting this score.

About typical

Healthcare Access

healthier than 44%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 3%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 3%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 29%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 13%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 5%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 6%

8%

Disability

healthier than 5%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 14%

5%

Nothing measured is lifting this score.

About typical

Healthcare Access

healthier than 48%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 10%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 2%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 19%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 10%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 4%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 31%

8%

Disability

healthier than 6%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 12%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

3 of our published findings list this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Below what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 74.2 ± 1.5 years. A median household income of $71,942 predicts 78.8 years — 4.6 years below.

    Ranked #5,367 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

  • Below its nearby ZIPs

    The ZIP codes that outlive their neighbors

    Estimated life expectancy is 74.2 ± 1.5 years. The 50 nearest ZIP codes with estimates average 78.8 years — 4.6 years below them.

    Ranked #3,269 of the 3,687 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above the nearby-ZIP average, highest first.

  • Highest-risk tenth

    Air toxics and the years between the two ends of the risk scale

    Modeled air-toxics cancer risk is 39.8 cases per million — among the tenth of compared ZIP codes with the most. Estimated life expectancy is 74.2 ± 1.5 years.

    Ranked #1,449 of the 4,173 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by modeled air-toxics risk, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults27.3%24.4–30.5
High blood pressure among adults40.3%36.4–44.3
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults7.5%6.8–8.3
Current asthma among adults10.7%9.5–12.0
Coronary heart disease among adults7.4%6.7–8.2
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults8.1%7.2–9.1
Depression among adults18.1%15.3–21.2
Diagnosed diabetes among adults14.5%12.7–16.4
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened39.3%35.3–43.6
Obesity among adults38.0%31.3–45.4
Stroke among adults4.5%4.2–4.9
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years17.3%14.2–20.6
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years15.9%13.9–18.1
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure78.1%75.4–80.6
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults78.4%74.9–81.7
Cholesterol screening among adults86.4%84.6–88.0
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years61.5%56.3–66.6
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults56.0%52.2–59.7
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years72.2%64.0–79.5
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults14.4%11.8–17.2
Current cigarette smoking among adults16.9%14.7–19.3
No leisure-time physical activity among adults34.1%29.5–39.0
Short sleep duration among adults45.4%38.6–52.4
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults25.2%22.4–28.1
Frequent mental distress among adults18.3%16.3–20.5
Frequent physical distress among adults16.1%14.3–18.0
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults16.3%14.6–18.1
Any disability among adults34.1%30.0–38.3
Hearing disability among adults7.0%6.2–7.8
Independent living disability among adults10.6%9.5–11.7
Mobility disability among adults17.2%15.2–19.3
Self-care disability among adults5.7%5.2–6.2
Vision disability among adults7.7%7.1–8.4
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults27.1%23.6–31.1
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults25.0%22.2–28.1
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults19.4%17.2–21.8
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults19.9%17.7–22.4
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults12.6%11.3–14.1
Loneliness among adults36.0%31.2–41.3
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults13.1%11.6–14.8
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NJ median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate23.8%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3645.8% (1.8–16.1%) n=588
Uninsured 18–648.2%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2865.6% (1.2–16.1%) n=585
No HS diploma (25+)13.0%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.3% (1.4–15.4%) n=589
Bachelor's or higher (25+)18.2%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50544.2% (20.0–72.5%) n=589
Unemployment rate (16+)8.6%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2745.3% (2.5–9.7%) n=583
Households without a vehicle18.1%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.8% (0.8–17.6%) n=585
Broadband subscription88.3%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32294.4% (88.0–98.5%) n=585
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)38.5%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32231.7% (22.1–46.5%) n=585
Homeownership rate53.9%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32277.5% (39.3–94.9%) n=585
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.8%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.4% (0.0–7.4%) n=585
Foreign-born population5.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,55313.7% (3.3–39.5%) n=590
Single-parent households46.3%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08749.6% (35.2–64.9%) n=581
Population 65+16.6%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55317.8% (11.7–27.5%) n=590
Median age40.4 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.0 yr (35.6–51.8) n=582
Median household income$71,942$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$111,711 ($68,311–$188,075) n=565
Median home value$198,100$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$449,450 ($250,890–$845,440) n=564
Median gross rent$1,347$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,781 ($1,267–$2,530) n=516
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NJ median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth74.2 yr ± 0.7578.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.4 yr (76.6–83.7) n=571

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.75 years of 74.2, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured