Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

07718

in Belford, New JerseyPopulation 6,658

64.71/ 100

Ranked #2,114 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 6.6%)

Ranked #257 of 583 New Jersey ZIPs (top 44%)

Ranked #440 of 853 New York-Newark-Jersey City, NY-NJ ZIPs (bottom 48%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Outer-floodplain exposure

8.4%

in the top 4.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US96th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 0.2%-annual-chance flood band — the “500-year” zone, a lower but real 1-in-500 yearly chance.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Floodplain exposure

42.5%

in the top 5.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST90th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 1%-annual-chance floodplain — the “100-year” flood zone, where flooding has about a 1-in-100 chance in any given year.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Median household income

$131,531

in the top 6.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST68th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The middle household income in this ZIP — half of households earn more, half earn less — in dollars per year.

Full methodology ›

Mobility disability

9.0%

in the bottom 5.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST28th
US6th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.

Full methodology ›

Lithium in drinking water

10 µg/L

in the bottom 8.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST14th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The average detected level of lithium — a natural trace metal with no federal drinking-water limit yet — across the public water systems serving this ZIP, in micrograms per liter.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Walkability

120 intersections/sq mi

in the top 8.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST77th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

Homeownership rate

95.1%

in the top 8.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST91st
US91st
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes that are owned, rather than rented, by the people living in them.

Full methodology ›

Diabetes

8.6%

in the bottom 6.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST20th
US7th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been diagnosed with diabetes.

Full methodology ›

Fair or poor health

13.6%

in the bottom 7.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST37th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who rate their own general health as fair or poor.

Full methodology ›

Independent-living disability

5.8%

in the bottom 7.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST43rd
US7th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have difficulty doing errands alone, such as visiting a doctor’s office, because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition.

Full methodology ›

The read

On the composite measure, Belford, New Jersey (ZIP 07718) stands in the top 6.6% healthiest ZIPs nationally (2,114th) and the top 44% of New Jersey (257th).

continue reading

The strongest marks in the data are worth naming first: household income is in the top 6.7% nationally, and modeled mobility disability registers in the bottom 5.6% nationally. Lithium in drinking water lies in the bottom 8.2% nationally, and walkability is in the top 8.2% nationally. Homeownership registers in the top 8.6% nationally, modeled loneliness lies in the bottom 10.3% nationally, and modeled diabetes is in the bottom 6.6% nationally. Modeled fair or poor health registers in the bottom 7.9% nationally. On the other side, outer-floodplain exposure lies in the top 4.5% nationally, and floodplain exposure is in the top 5.6% nationally.

Set beside the wider area around it, outer-floodplain exposure runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. For clarity, lithium in drinking water is a natural metal that dissolves into some groundwater and has no federal drinking-water limit yet. Outer-floodplain exposure is land with a lower but real 1-in-500 chance of flooding each year, nicknamed the "500-year floodplain". Floodplain exposure is land with about a 1-in-100 chance of flooding each year, nicknamed the "100-year floodplain". ZIP 07737, just across the boundary, ranks better overall among the ZIPs nearby.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the New York-Newark-Jersey City, NY-NJ metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 88%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 92%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 75%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 81%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 93%

8%

Disability

healthier than 93%

7%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 59%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 51%

5%

Holding it back

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 17%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 61%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 63%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 79%

14%

Disability

healthier than 61%

7%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 54%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 58%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 45%

8%

Holding it back

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 11%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 26%

5%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 69%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 79%

14%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 56%

21%

Preventive Care

healthier than 42%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 60%

11%

Disability

healthier than 57%

7%

Holding it back

Mental Health

healthier than 35%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 7%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 15%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults22.8%20.5–25.2
High blood pressure among adults30.5%27.7–33.4
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults8.2%7.4–9.1
Current asthma among adults9.2%8.1–10.3
Coronary heart disease among adults5.2%4.6–5.8
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults4.9%4.2–5.7
Depression among adults15.8%13.6–18.2
Diagnosed diabetes among adults8.6%7.5–9.9
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened37.9%34.8–41.0
Obesity among adults31.0%26.8–35.3
Stroke among adults2.6%2.4–2.9
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years6.6%5.3–8.0
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years7.4%6.2–8.8
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure76.1%73.2–78.8
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults77.5%74.4–80.2
Cholesterol screening among adults89.6%88.0–90.9
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years68.0%64.1–71.7
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults73.8%71.0–76.3
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years76.8%70.6–82.1
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults18.0%15.4–20.7
Current cigarette smoking among adults11.0%9.1–12.9
No leisure-time physical activity among adults18.8%16.0–21.8
Short sleep duration among adults32.2%28.3–36.3
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults13.6%11.7–15.7
Frequent mental distress among adults15.1%13.3–17.0
Frequent physical distress among adults11.0%9.6–12.5
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults11.0%9.6–12.6
Any disability among adults22.0%19.1–25.0
Hearing disability among adults5.4%4.8–6.1
Independent living disability among adults5.8%5.1–6.6
Mobility disability among adults9.0%7.7–10.5
Self-care disability among adults2.6%2.3–3.0
Vision disability among adults3.4%3.0–3.8
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults19.3%16.8–22.3
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults8.8%7.3–10.6
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults5.2%4.2–6.4
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults8.4%7.1–10.0
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults5.3%4.6–6.2
Loneliness among adults28.5%25.2–32.2
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults5.2%4.4–6.1
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NJ median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate3.3%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3645.8% (1.8–16.1%) n=588
Uninsured 18–644.3%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2865.6% (1.2–16.1%) n=585
No HS diploma (25+)4.9%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.3% (1.4–15.4%) n=589
Bachelor's or higher (25+)45.3%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50544.2% (20.0–72.5%) n=589
Unemployment rate (16+)7.9%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2745.3% (2.5–9.7%) n=583
Households without a vehicle2.7%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.8% (0.8–17.6%) n=585
Broadband subscription95.9%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32294.4% (88.0–98.5%) n=585
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)20.4%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32231.7% (22.1–46.5%) n=585
Homeownership rate95.1%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32277.5% (39.3–94.9%) n=585
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.4% (0.0–7.4%) n=585
Foreign-born population5.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,55313.7% (3.3–39.5%) n=590
Single-parent households46.0%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08749.6% (35.2–64.9%) n=581
Population 65+13.1%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55317.8% (11.7–27.5%) n=590
Median age39.2 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.0 yr (35.6–51.8) n=582
Median household income$131,531$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$111,711 ($68,311–$188,075) n=565
Median home value$514,600$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$449,450 ($250,890–$845,440) n=564
Median gross rent$1,500$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,781 ($1,267–$2,530) n=516
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NJ median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth79.5 yr ± 1.3278.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.4 yr (76.6–83.7) n=571

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.32 years of 79.5, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured