Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

07640

in Harrington Park, New JerseyPopulation 4,954

71.52/ 100

Ranked #344 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 1.1%)

Ranked #76 of 583 New Jersey ZIPs (top 13.1%)

Ranked #136 of 853 New York-Newark-Jersey City, NY-NJ ZIPs (top 16%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Median household income

$180,500

in the top 1.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST88th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The middle household income in this ZIP — half of households earn more, half earn less — in dollars per year.

Full methodology ›

Obesity

22.6%

in the bottom 2.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST12th
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with obesity, defined as a body-mass index of 30 or higher.

Full methodology ›

Lack of transportation

4.0%

in the bottom 1.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST13th
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who lacked reliable transportation in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Utility shut-off threat

3.5%

in the bottom 1.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST11th
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults whose household was threatened with a utility shut-off in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Cognitive disability

7.8%

in the bottom 0.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST7th
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions.

Full methodology ›

Lead in tap water

11 ppb

in the top 2.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

US98th
Definition & source ›

The lead level at the 90th percentile of tap-water samples reported by the public water systems serving this ZIP, in parts per billion — the EPA requires action above 15 ppb.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Fatal road crashes

0 per 100,000 residents per year

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The annual rate of fatal road crashes per 100,000 residents, pooled over a ten-year window.

A rate per resident population. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the rate to be reliable — about 30% of US ZIPs — no value is published rather than an unstable one; those ZIPs are absent from this comparison, not counted as crash-free.

Full methodology ›

Food insecurity

6.5%

in the bottom 2.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST14th
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced food insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Housing insecurity

6.0%

in the bottom 2.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST13th
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced housing insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Independent-living disability

4.6%

in the bottom 1.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST12th
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have difficulty doing errands alone, such as visiting a doctor’s office, because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition.

Full methodology ›

The read

By its overall health score, Harrington Park, New Jersey (ZIP 07640) lands in the top 1.1% healthiest ZIPs nationally (344th) and the top 13.1% of New Jersey (76th).

continue reading

The measures split the difference for this area: household income lands in the top 1.7% nationally, and modeled obesity registers in the bottom 2.6% nationally. Modeled transportation sits in the bottom 1.6% nationally, and utility shutoff rests in the bottom 1.6% nationally. Modeled cognitive disability is in the bottom 0.5% nationally, fatal road crashes stands at the national minimum, and modeled food insecurity settles in the bottom 2.4% nationally. Modeled housing insecurity lies in the bottom 2.6% nationally, and independent living disability resides in the bottom 1.3% nationally. Against that, lead in tap water lands in the top 2.0% nationally.

Weighed against the ZIPs nearby, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. To translate a couple of terms, lead in tap water is the EPA trigger, 15 parts per billion in tap samples, above which a water system must act on lead. Overall, the nearest healthier neighbor is ZIP 07624, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the New York-Newark-Jersey City, NY-NJ metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 92%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 95%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 63%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 93%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 93%

11%

Mental Health

in the top 0.9%

8%

Disability

healthier than 98%

7%

About typical

Healthcare Access

healthier than 52%

5%

Holding it back

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 34%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 76%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 73%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 84%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 88%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 87%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 88%

8%

Disability

healthier than 86%

7%

Holding it back

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 22%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 28%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 74%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 78%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 83%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 76%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 87%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 87%

8%

Disability

healthier than 84%

7%

Holding it back

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 16%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 16%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Heavy environment, light chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 29.1; chronic-disease standing 92.2 (top 10%) — 63 points apart, heavier on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #15,712 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults21.3%19.2–23.6
High blood pressure among adults32.3%29.6–35.3
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.0%8.2–10.0
Current asthma among adults7.9%7.1–8.9
Coronary heart disease among adults5.1%4.5–5.8
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults4.0%3.2–5.0
Depression among adults14.1%12.3–16.2
Diagnosed diabetes among adults8.7%7.6–10.0
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened42.6%39.5–45.6
Obesity among adults22.6%19.4–26.2
Stroke among adults2.6%2.2–3.0
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years4.6%3.7–5.7
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years5.1%4.0–6.5
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure78.9%76.0–81.5
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults80.8%78.2–83.2
Cholesterol screening among adults92.4%91.0–93.5
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years68.0%64.1–71.6
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults76.9%74.3–79.2
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years77.7%71.6–82.8
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults15.3%13.2–17.6
Current cigarette smoking among adults6.7%5.2–8.7
No leisure-time physical activity among adults17.4%14.7–20.6
Short sleep duration among adults34.6%30.7–38.5
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults11.4%9.7–13.6
Frequent mental distress among adults12.3%10.8–14.1
Frequent physical distress among adults9.3%8.1–10.8
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults7.8%6.7–9.4
Any disability among adults18.7%16.3–21.8
Hearing disability among adults5.3%4.7–6.1
Independent living disability among adults4.6%3.9–5.5
Mobility disability among adults8.5%7.0–10.2
Self-care disability among adults2.2%1.8–2.6
Vision disability among adults2.9%2.5–3.4
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults21.2%18.0–24.3
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults6.5%4.8–8.4
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults3.2%2.2–4.4
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults6.0%4.7–7.5
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults4.0%3.2–4.8
Loneliness among adults30.9%27.1–34.6
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults3.5%2.8–4.3
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NJ median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate6.8%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3645.8% (1.8–16.1%) n=588
Uninsured 18–641.8%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2865.6% (1.2–16.1%) n=585
No HS diploma (25+)2.3%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.3% (1.4–15.4%) n=589
Bachelor's or higher (25+)73.1%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50544.2% (20.0–72.5%) n=589
Unemployment rate (16+)3.3%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2745.3% (2.5–9.7%) n=583
Households without a vehicle3.3%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.8% (0.8–17.6%) n=585
Broadband subscription92.8%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32294.4% (88.0–98.5%) n=585
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)37.7%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32231.7% (22.1–46.5%) n=585
Homeownership rate92.3%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32277.5% (39.3–94.9%) n=585
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.4% (0.0–7.4%) n=585
Foreign-born population17.8%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,55313.7% (3.3–39.5%) n=590
Single-parent households57.3%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08749.6% (35.2–64.9%) n=581
Population 65+21.7%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55317.8% (11.7–27.5%) n=590
Median age46.9 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.0 yr (35.6–51.8) n=582
Median household income$180,500$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$111,711 ($68,311–$188,075) n=565
Median home value$776,900$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$449,450 ($250,890–$845,440) n=564
Median gross rent$1,414$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,781 ($1,267–$2,530) n=516
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NJ median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth83.9 yr ± 1.5278.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.4 yr (76.6–83.7) n=571

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.52 years of 83.9, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured