Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

07424

in Woodland Park, New JerseyPopulation 28,085

62.79/ 100

Ranked #3,083 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 9.7%)

Ranked #308 of 583 New Jersey ZIPs (bottom 47%)

Ranked #523 of 853 New York-Newark-Jersey City, NY-NJ ZIPs (bottom 39%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Obesity

26.1%

in the bottom 7.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST33rd
US7th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with obesity, defined as a body-mass index of 30 or higher.

Full methodology ›

Dental provider access

1 per 1,000 residents

in the top 6.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST84th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The number of dental offices located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a Superfund site

0.8 mi

in the bottom 6.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST31st
US6th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

Physician access

2 per 1,000 residents

in the top 7.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST84th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The number of physicians’ offices located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Elder-services access

0.19 per 1,000 residents

in the top 7.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST94th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The number of services for older adults and people with disabilities inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Outer-floodplain exposure

3.8%

in the top 9.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST80th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 0.2%-annual-chance flood band — the “500-year” zone, a lower but real 1-in-500 yearly chance.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

PFOA in drinking water

88.4%

in the top 9.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST38th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The share of residents served by public water systems where PFOA, one of the man-made “forever chemicals,” was detected in EPA testing.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Transit access

3.1 per 1,000 residents

in the top 9.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST82nd
US90th
Definition & source ›

The number of public-transit stops inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Energy-cost burden

1.7%

in the bottom 7.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST34th
US7th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of household income spent on home energy bills — electricity, gas, and heating fuels.

A modeled share of household income spent on home energy. Estimates that hit the model’s 100% ceiling are suppressed rather than published, because at that point the figure reflects the model’s limit rather than a measured burden.

Full methodology ›

High blood pressure

28.9%

in the bottom 8.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST12th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.

Full methodology ›

The read

Woodland Park, New Jersey (ZIP 07424), in overall standing, comes out in the top 9.7% healthiest ZIPs nationally (3,083rd) and the bottom 47% of New Jersey (308th).

continue reading

A healthy showing across the board, and a few measures carry it: modeled obesity registers in the bottom 7.4% nationally, dental providers is in the top 6.1% nationally, and physicians lies in the top 7.3% nationally. Elder services registers in the top 7.7% nationally, transit is in the top 9.8% nationally, and modeled energy burden lies in the bottom 7.0% nationally. Walkability registers in the top 10.2% nationally. On the other hand, distance to a Superfund site is in the bottom 6.5% nationally, and outer-floodplain exposure lies in the top 9.3% nationally. PFOA in drinking water registers in the top 9.3% nationally.

Set within its surrounding area, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Defined simply, for reference, distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. PFOA in drinking water is one of the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down. Outer-floodplain exposure is land with a lower but real 1-in-500 chance of flooding each year, nicknamed the "500-year floodplain". The closest healthier ZIP overall is ZIP 07004, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the New York-Newark-Jersey City, NY-NJ metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 91%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 86%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 77%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 92%

8%

Disability

healthier than 87%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 71%

5%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 56%

13%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 45%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 9%

14%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 70%

21%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 65%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 50%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 53%

11%

Disability

healthier than 45%

7%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 14%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 35%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 39%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 31%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 68%

21%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 56%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 53%

11%

Disability

healthier than 42%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 47%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 10%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 28%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 29%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 25%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

2 of our published findings list this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Above what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 81.9 ± 1.3 years. A median household income of $105,050 predicts 80.3 years — 1.6 years above.

    Ranked #1,193 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

  • Heavy environment, light chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 9.3 (bottom 10%); chronic-disease standing 90.9 (top 10%) — 82 points apart, heavier on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #17,308 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults20.9%18.7–23.3
High blood pressure among adults28.9%26.1–31.9
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults8.1%7.4–8.9
Current asthma among adults9.0%8.0–10.1
Coronary heart disease among adults5.2%4.7–5.8
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults4.8%4.2–5.5
Depression among adults16.4%14.1–19.0
Diagnosed diabetes among adults9.2%8.0–10.4
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened36.0%32.8–39.3
Obesity among adults26.1%22.1–30.5
Stroke among adults2.7%2.5–3.0
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years10.5%8.6–12.8
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years10.7%9.3–12.3
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure76.7%74.0–79.3
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults75.7%72.7–78.9
Cholesterol screening among adults88.8%87.3–90.3
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years64.9%60.7–68.9
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults69.2%66.3–72.0
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years78.3%72.1–83.6
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults17.3%14.7–20.2
Current cigarette smoking among adults9.4%8.0–10.8
No leisure-time physical activity among adults22.9%19.9–26.1
Short sleep duration among adults33.6%29.5–37.7
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults15.5%13.6–17.4
Frequent mental distress among adults15.1%13.5–17.0
Frequent physical distress among adults11.8%10.4–13.2
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults11.9%10.5–13.4
Any disability among adults24.9%22.0–28.0
Hearing disability among adults5.6%4.9–6.2
Independent living disability among adults6.2%5.5–6.9
Mobility disability among adults10.5%9.2–12.0
Self-care disability among adults2.8%2.5–3.1
Vision disability among adults4.0%3.6–4.4
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults23.0%20.1–26.1
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults12.9%11.1–14.7
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults6.3%5.3–7.4
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults11.0%9.5–12.5
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults6.5%5.7–7.4
Loneliness among adults35.8%31.8–40.1
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults5.7%4.9–6.5
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NJ median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate3.4%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3645.8% (1.8–16.1%) n=588
Uninsured 18–647.5%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2865.6% (1.2–16.1%) n=585
No HS diploma (25+)4.3%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.3% (1.4–15.4%) n=589
Bachelor's or higher (25+)46.2%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50544.2% (20.0–72.5%) n=589
Unemployment rate (16+)6.5%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2745.3% (2.5–9.7%) n=583
Households without a vehicle4.7%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.8% (0.8–17.6%) n=585
Broadband subscription95.5%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32294.4% (88.0–98.5%) n=585
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)38.7%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32231.7% (22.1–46.5%) n=585
Homeownership rate67.1%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32277.5% (39.3–94.9%) n=585
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.6%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.4% (0.0–7.4%) n=585
Foreign-born population24.8%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,55313.7% (3.3–39.5%) n=590
Single-parent households54.6%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08749.6% (35.2–64.9%) n=581
Population 65+17.2%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55317.8% (11.7–27.5%) n=590
Median age41.0 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.0 yr (35.6–51.8) n=582
Median household income$105,050$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$111,711 ($68,311–$188,075) n=565
Median home value$487,600$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$449,450 ($250,890–$845,440) n=564
Median gross rent$1,841$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,781 ($1,267–$2,530) n=516
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NJ median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth81.9 yr ± 0.6778.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.4 yr (76.6–83.7) n=571

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.67 years of 81.9, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured