Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

07067

in Colonia, New JerseyPopulation 18,587

62.95/ 100

Ranked #3,000 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 9.4%)

Ranked #303 of 583 New Jersey ZIPs (bottom 48%)

Ranked #518 of 853 New York-Newark-Jersey City, NY-NJ ZIPs (bottom 39%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

PFAS in drinking water

81.2%

in the top 1.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST85th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

PFOA in drinking water

100%

at the national maximum

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents served by public water systems where PFOA, one of the man-made “forever chemicals,” was detected in EPA testing.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

100%

at the national maximum

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents served by public water systems where PFAS — man-made “forever chemicals” that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down — were detected in EPA testing.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Fatal road crashes

1.6 per 100,000 residents per year

in the bottom 5.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST15th
US6th
Definition & source ›

The annual rate of fatal road crashes per 100,000 residents, pooled over a ten-year window.

A rate per resident population. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the rate to be reliable — about 30% of US ZIPs — no value is published rather than an unstable one; those ZIPs are absent from this comparison, not counted as crash-free.

Full methodology ›

Walkability

120 intersections/sq mi

in the top 8.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST77th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

Energy-cost burden

1.6%

in the bottom 6.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST29th
US6th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of household income spent on home energy bills — electricity, gas, and heating fuels.

A modeled share of household income spent on home energy. Estimates that hit the model’s 100% ceiling are suppressed rather than published, because at that point the figure reflects the model’s limit rather than a measured burden.

Full methodology ›

Median household income

$122,713

in the top 8.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST60th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The middle household income in this ZIP — half of households earn more, half earn less — in dollars per year.

Full methodology ›

Cognitive disability

10.6%

in the bottom 7.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST46th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions.

Full methodology ›

Independent-living disability

5.9%

in the bottom 8.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST46th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have difficulty doing errands alone, such as visiting a doctor’s office, because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition.

Full methodology ›

Arsenic in groundwater

1.5%

in the bottom 12.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST4th
US13th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

The read

Colonia, New Jersey (ZIP 07067), by its overall standing, sits in the top 9.4% healthiest ZIPs nationally (3,000th) and the bottom 48% of New Jersey (303rd).

continue reading

Both sides of the picture show up plainly in this area's numbers: fatal road crashes resides in the bottom 5.7% nationally, walkability rests in the top 8.0% nationally, and modeled energy burden lies in the bottom 6.0% nationally. Household income sits in the top 8.8% nationally, modeled cognitive disability settles in the bottom 7.8% nationally, and modeled independent living disability registers in the bottom 8.3% nationally. Modeled hearing disability stands in the bottom 11.0% nationally. By contrast, modeled pfas lands in the top 1.7% nationally, and PFOA in drinking water is at the national maximum. PFAS in drinking water resides at the national maximum.

Held up against its neighbors, park land runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Defined in plain terms, pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. PFOA in drinking water is one of the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down. PFAS in drinking water is the family of man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down. The nearest ZIP ranking healthier overall is ZIP 07066, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the New York-Newark-Jersey City, NY-NJ metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 85%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 88%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 69%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 72%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 97%

8%

Disability

healthier than 90%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 72%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 68%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 3%

14%

Lifting this score

Mental Health

healthier than 69%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 74%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 60%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 48%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 53%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 47%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 47%

11%

Disability

healthier than 51%

7%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 3%

14%

Lifting this score

Mental Health

healthier than 65%

8%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 44%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 58%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 45%

11%

Disability

healthier than 48%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 55%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 42%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 2%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 36%

13%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Heavy environment, light chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 3.5 (bottom 10%); chronic-disease standing 85.2 — 82 points apart, heavier on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #17,318 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults22.9%20.7–25.2
High blood pressure among adults33.7%30.8–36.6
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults7.9%7.2–8.6
Current asthma among adults8.8%7.9–9.9
Coronary heart disease among adults5.4%4.8–5.9
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults4.8%4.2–5.5
Depression among adults14.2%12.2–16.3
Diagnosed diabetes among adults10.7%9.4–12.0
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened39.7%36.7–42.9
Obesity among adults30.0%26.1–34.1
Stroke among adults2.8%2.6–3.1
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years7.4%6.0–9.0
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years8.3%7.1–9.5
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure77.5%74.6–80.0
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults79.5%76.7–82.0
Cholesterol screening among adults90.1%88.7–91.2
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years66.6%62.6–70.4
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults69.0%66.1–71.7
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years73.9%67.6–79.6
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults15.8%13.6–18.1
Current cigarette smoking among adults10.3%8.8–11.8
No leisure-time physical activity among adults22.9%20.2–25.8
Short sleep duration among adults37.2%33.2–41.2
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults15.7%13.9–17.6
Frequent mental distress among adults14.1%12.6–15.7
Frequent physical distress among adults11.2%10.0–12.5
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults10.6%9.4–11.9
Any disability among adults23.8%21.2–26.5
Hearing disability among adults5.5%4.9–6.2
Independent living disability among adults5.9%5.2–6.6
Mobility disability among adults10.7%9.3–12.0
Self-care disability among adults2.9%2.6–3.1
Vision disability among adults3.9%3.5–4.2
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults22.5%19.9–25.4
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults10.8%9.3–12.4
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults5.8%4.8–6.9
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults9.3%8.1–10.7
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults5.9%5.2–6.6
Loneliness among adults32.5%29.2–36.1
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults5.2%4.5–6.0
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NJ median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate7.4%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3645.8% (1.8–16.1%) n=588
Uninsured 18–646.1%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2865.6% (1.2–16.1%) n=585
No HS diploma (25+)8.4%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.3% (1.4–15.4%) n=589
Bachelor's or higher (25+)48.7%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50544.2% (20.0–72.5%) n=589
Unemployment rate (16+)4.9%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2745.3% (2.5–9.7%) n=583
Households without a vehicle3.1%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.8% (0.8–17.6%) n=585
Broadband subscription95.0%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32294.4% (88.0–98.5%) n=585
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)36.5%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32231.7% (22.1–46.5%) n=585
Homeownership rate88.9%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32277.5% (39.3–94.9%) n=585
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.7%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.4% (0.0–7.4%) n=585
Foreign-born population27.1%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,55313.7% (3.3–39.5%) n=590
Single-parent households52.5%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08749.6% (35.2–64.9%) n=581
Population 65+19.2%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55317.8% (11.7–27.5%) n=590
Median age43.6 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.0 yr (35.6–51.8) n=582
Median household income$122,713$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$111,711 ($68,311–$188,075) n=565
Median home value$493,100$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$449,450 ($250,890–$845,440) n=564
Median gross rent$2,047$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,781 ($1,267–$2,530) n=516
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NJ median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth81.2 yr ± 0.6878.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.4 yr (76.6–83.7) n=571

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.68 years of 81.2, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured