Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

06467

in Milldale, ConnecticutPopulation 405

54.87/ 100

Ranked #9,599 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 30%)

Ranked #223 of 277 Connecticut ZIPs (bottom 19%)

Ranked #83 of 95 Hartford-East Hartford-Middletown, CT ZIPs (bottom 12.7%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Lithium in drinking water

9 µg/L

in the bottom 0.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The average detected level of lithium — a natural trace metal with no federal drinking-water limit yet — across the public water systems serving this ZIP, in micrograms per liter.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Expected annual disaster loss

$0

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

Housing-cost burden

0.00%

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.

Full methodology ›

Poverty rate

0.00%

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The share of residents whose income is below the federal poverty line, from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey.

Full methodology ›

Home broadband subscription

100%

at the national maximum

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.

Full methodology ›

Floodplain exposure

0.00%

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 1%-annual-chance floodplain — the “100-year” flood zone, where flooding has about a 1-in-100 chance in any given year.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Lead in tap water

0 ppb

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

US1st
Definition & source ›

The lead level at the 90th percentile of tap-water samples reported by the public water systems serving this ZIP, in parts per billion — the EPA requires action above 15 ppb.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Homeownership rate

42.3%

in the bottom 5.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST11th
US6th
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes that are owned, rather than rented, by the people living in them.

Full methodology ›

Mammography

81.8%

in the top 4.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST81st
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

The read

Milldale, Connecticut (ZIP 06467), in overall standing, comes out in the top 30% healthiest ZIPs nationally (9,599th) and the bottom 19% of Connecticut (223rd).

continue reading

A few readings each way define this mixed profile: lithium in drinking water settles in the bottom 0.2% nationally, modeled expected annual loss lands at the national minimum, and housing-cost burden rests at the national minimum. Poverty settles at the national minimum, home broadband subscription lands at the national maximum, and floodplain exposure rests at the national minimum. Lead in tap water settles at the national minimum, and modeled mammography lands in the top 4.4% nationally. Unemployment rests at the national minimum, shared with about 15% of ZIPs. Pulling the other way, homeownership settles in the bottom 5.9% nationally.

Set within its surrounding area, park land runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Defined simply, for reference, lithium in drinking water is a natural metal that dissolves into some groundwater and has no federal drinking-water limit yet. Expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. Lead in tap water is the EPA trigger, 15 parts per billion in tap samples, above which a water system must act on lead. The closest healthier ZIP overall is ZIP 06479, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Hartford-East Hartford-Middletown, CT metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 66%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 64%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 84%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 66%

11%

Disability

healthier than 73%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 90%

5%

About typical

Healthcare Access

healthier than 56%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 10%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 27%

8%

Lifting this score

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 97%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 33%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 38%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 11%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 31%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 31%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 7%

8%

Disability

healthier than 26%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 18%

5%

Lifting this score

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 99%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 36%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 29%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 14%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 17%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 21%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 5%

8%

Disability

healthier than 17%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 29%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults27.0%24.6–29.6
High blood pressure among adults31.5%28.8–34.5
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.1%8.2–10.0
Current asthma among adults12.9%11.5–14.4
Coronary heart disease among adults5.8%4.9–6.8
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults6.7%5.1–8.5
Depression among adults25.2%22.4–28.3
Diagnosed diabetes among adults10.3%8.8–12.0
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened39.0%36.0–41.9
Obesity among adults30.4%26.1–35.0
Stroke among adults3.3%2.7–3.9
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years7.5%6.2–9.1
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years8.5%6.2–11.3
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure77.0%74.6–79.3
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults81.8%79.2–84.1
Cholesterol screening among adults88.5%86.3–90.6
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years67.2%63.9–70.4
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults68.3%65.7–71.1
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years81.8%77.3–85.6
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults15.8%13.8–18.0
Current cigarette smoking among adults11.8%9.1–15.0
No leisure-time physical activity among adults25.5%21.0–30.3
Short sleep duration among adults35.9%32.3–39.9
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults16.6%13.4–20.2
Frequent mental distress among adults18.1%15.8–20.6
Frequent physical distress among adults12.9%11.0–15.2
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults14.1%11.7–17.0
Any disability among adults27.6%23.6–32.1
Hearing disability among adults6.1%5.2–7.1
Independent living disability among adults7.8%6.3–9.6
Mobility disability among adults12.1%9.8–15.0
Self-care disability among adults3.3%2.6–4.1
Vision disability among adults4.5%3.7–5.5
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults24.3%20.7–28.0
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults14.5%10.7–18.4
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults10.8%7.6–14.3
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults10.5%8.1–13.1
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults7.9%6.2–9.6
Loneliness among adults34.5%30.5–38.6
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults7.1%5.6–8.7
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)CT median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate0.0%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3645.8% (2.3–20.8%) n=278
Uninsured 18–640.0%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2864.5% (1.2–12.9%) n=277
No HS diploma (25+)1.9%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5054.6% (1.1–14.3%) n=278
Bachelor's or higher (25+)52.7%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50543.6% (19.2–70.7%) n=278
Unemployment rate (16+)0.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.4% (1.6–9.1%) n=277
Households without a vehicle0.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.1% (0.0–13.7%) n=278
Broadband subscription100.0%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32293.7% (86.9–98.8%) n=278
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)0.0%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32229.3% (18.2–44.9%) n=278
Homeownership rate42.3%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32280.1% (41.3–93.1%) n=278
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.7% (0.0–3.8%) n=278
Foreign-born population0.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5539.3% (2.1–22.3%) n=278
Single-parent households81.5%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08751.1% (36.0–68.7%) n=277
Population 65+0.0%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.8% (13.4–30.2%) n=278
Median age52.2 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29244.1 yr (34.7–53.2) n=278
Median household income$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$107,247 ($63,371–$163,278) n=270
Median home value$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$365,900 ($239,080–$622,060) n=268
Median gross rent$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,450 ($1,128–$2,175) n=247
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)CT median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth80.6 yr ± 1.1678.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30881.2 yr (77.7–83.5) n=266

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.16 years of 80.6, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured