Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

06062

in Plainville, ConnecticutPopulation 17,555

54.12/ 100

Ranked #10,546 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 33%)

Ranked #226 of 277 Connecticut ZIPs (bottom 18%)

Ranked #84 of 95 Hartford-East Hartford-Middletown, CT ZIPs (bottom 11.6%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Expected annual disaster loss

$0

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

85.8%

in the top 0.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US99th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

PFOA in drinking water

100%

at the national maximum

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents served by public water systems where PFOA, one of the man-made “forever chemicals,” was detected in EPA testing.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Industrial-pollution burden

in the top 2.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

100%

at the national maximum

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents served by public water systems where PFAS — man-made “forever chemicals” that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down — were detected in EPA testing.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

PFOS in drinking water

96.7%

in the top 5.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST85th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents served by public water systems where PFOS, one of the most common “forever chemicals,” was detected in EPA testing.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Transit access

4.1 per 1,000 residents

in the top 7.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST74th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The number of public-transit stops inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Mental-health provider access

0.11 per 1,000 residents

in the top 9.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST89th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The number of mental-health clinics located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Pharmacy access

0.34 per 1,000 residents

in the top 11.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST90th
US89th
Definition & source ›

The number of pharmacies located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Arsenic in groundwater

13.3%

in the top 11.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US88th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

The read

In overall standing, Plainville, Connecticut (ZIP 06062) comes out in the top 33% healthiest ZIPs nationally (10,546th) and the bottom 18% of Connecticut (226th).

continue reading

Both sides of the picture show up plainly in this area's numbers: modeled expected annual loss rests at the national minimum, transit lies in the top 7.0% nationally, and mental-health providers sits in the top 9.4% nationally. Modeled extreme heat settles at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs. Pharmacy registers in the top 11.1% nationally. By contrast, modeled pfas stands in the top 0.9% nationally, and PFOA in drinking water lands at the national maximum. Modeled industrial-pollution burden is in the top 2.8% nationally, and PFAS in drinking water resides at the national maximum. PFOS in drinking water rests in the top 5.8% nationally.

Relative to the ZIPs around it, industrial-pollution burden runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In plain terms, expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. Pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. PFOA in drinking water is one of the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down. The nearest healthier ZIP overall is ZIP 06010, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Hartford-East Hartford-Middletown, CT metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 62%

21%

Preventive Care

healthier than 88%

13%

Disability

healthier than 77%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 87%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 56%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 55%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 40%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 55%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 6%

14%

Lifting this score

Healthcare Access

healthier than 84%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 22%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 31%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 3%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 35%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 24%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 14%

8%

Disability

healthier than 32%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 21%

5%

Lifting this score

Healthcare Access

healthier than 86%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 21%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 25%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 4%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 19%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 14%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 12%

8%

Disability

healthier than 23%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 26%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Heavy environment, light chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 6.4 (bottom 10%); chronic-disease standing 62.0 — 56 points apart, heavier on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #14,965 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults27.1%24.8–29.3
High blood pressure among adults33.1%30.4–35.7
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.1%8.3–9.8
Current asthma among adults12.3%11.1–13.6
Coronary heart disease among adults6.1%5.5–6.7
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults6.5%5.7–7.3
Depression among adults23.8%21.2–26.6
Diagnosed diabetes among adults10.8%9.6–12.1
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened40.3%37.3–43.2
Obesity among adults31.8%27.6–36.3
Stroke among adults3.3%3.0–3.6
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years10.8%8.9–12.9
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years8.3%7.1–9.5
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure76.8%74.3–79.1
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults81.8%79.4–84.0
Cholesterol screening among adults90.0%88.6–91.2
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years71.8%68.7–74.9
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults68.3%65.8–71.0
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years79.9%75.3–84.1
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults16.6%14.6–18.8
Current cigarette smoking among adults12.6%11.0–14.4
No leisure-time physical activity among adults25.1%22.2–28.3
Short sleep duration among adults37.0%33.4–41.1
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults16.2%14.5–18.1
Frequent mental distress among adults17.4%15.7–19.2
Frequent physical distress among adults13.0%11.7–14.5
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults13.3%11.9–14.8
Any disability among adults26.8%24.1–29.5
Hearing disability among adults6.3%5.7–7.1
Independent living disability among adults7.1%6.4–7.9
Mobility disability among adults11.8%10.5–13.3
Self-care disability among adults3.3%3.0–3.7
Vision disability among adults4.3%3.9–4.7
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults25.4%22.8–28.4
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults13.6%11.9–15.5
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults10.0%8.6–11.7
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults10.8%9.5–12.3
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults7.3%6.5–8.3
Loneliness among adults33.3%30.0–36.6
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults7.2%6.3–8.3
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)CT median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate6.5%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3645.8% (2.3–20.8%) n=278
Uninsured 18–644.1%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2864.5% (1.2–12.9%) n=277
No HS diploma (25+)7.3%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5054.6% (1.1–14.3%) n=278
Bachelor's or higher (25+)30.0%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50543.6% (19.2–70.7%) n=278
Unemployment rate (16+)3.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.4% (1.6–9.1%) n=277
Households without a vehicle5.6%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.1% (0.0–13.7%) n=278
Broadband subscription87.0%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32293.7% (86.9–98.8%) n=278
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)27.0%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32229.3% (18.2–44.9%) n=278
Homeownership rate67.7%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32280.1% (41.3–93.1%) n=278
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.9%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.7% (0.0–3.8%) n=278
Foreign-born population11.3%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5539.3% (2.1–22.3%) n=278
Single-parent households46.6%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08751.1% (36.0–68.7%) n=277
Population 65+20.1%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.8% (13.4–30.2%) n=278
Median age44.3 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29244.1 yr (34.7–53.2) n=278
Median household income$84,310$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$107,247 ($63,371–$163,278) n=270
Median home value$253,900$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$365,900 ($239,080–$622,060) n=268
Median gross rent$1,126$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,450 ($1,128–$2,175) n=247
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)CT median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth79.5 yr ± 0.8878.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30881.2 yr (77.7–83.5) n=266

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.88 years of 79.5, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured