Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

05682

in Worcester, VermontPopulation 1,149

61.06/ 100

Ranked #4,089 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 12.8%)

Ranked #47 of 249 Vermont ZIPs (top 19%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Short sleep

24%

in the bottom 0.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST5th
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.

Full methodology ›

Tree cover

90.2%

in the top 1.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST94th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.

Full methodology ›

Industrial-pollution burden

in the bottom 4.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST22nd
US4th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

Obesity

26.5%

in the bottom 8.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST17th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with obesity, defined as a body-mass index of 30 or higher.

Full methodology ›

Fair or poor health

12.8%

in the bottom 5.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST16th
US5th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who rate their own general health as fair or poor.

Full methodology ›

Mobility disability

9.6%

in the bottom 7.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST16th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.

Full methodology ›

Diabetes

8.6%

in the bottom 6.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST23rd
US7th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been diagnosed with diabetes.

Full methodology ›

Independent-living disability

5.9%

in the bottom 8.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST17th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have difficulty doing errands alone, such as visiting a doctor’s office, because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition.

Full methodology ›

Walkability

2.7 intersections/sq mi

in the bottom 12.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST8th
US13th
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

Crowded housing

5.1%

in the top 13.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US86th
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes with more than one person per room, the Census definition of crowded housing.

Full methodology ›

The read

By the composite measure, Worcester, Vermont (ZIP 05682) sits in the top 12.8% healthiest ZIPs nationally (4,089th) and the top 19% of Vermont (47th).

continue reading

Where the data leans one way, another reading answers it: modeled short sleep registers in the bottom 0.2% nationally, tree cover lands in the top 1.3% nationally, and industrial-pollution burden resides in the bottom 4.1% nationally. Modeled obesity lies in the bottom 8.2% nationally, fair or poor health settles in the bottom 5.4% nationally, and mobility disability stands in the bottom 7.6% nationally. Modeled extreme heat is at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs. Modeled diabetes rests in the bottom 6.6% nationally. Modeled loud transportation noise sits at the national minimum, shared with about 22% of ZIPs. Modeled independent living disability registers in the bottom 8.3% nationally.

Compared with the ZIPs that surround it, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In plain language, industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. Extreme heat is a modeled count of days a year reaching a dangerously high temperature, a leading weather hazard. Loud transportation noise is the modeled share of an area exposed to road, rail, and air noise at or above 65 decibels, near conversation volume. ZIP 05602, just across the boundary, ranks healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 80%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 90%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 77%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 97%

11%

Disability

healthier than 87%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 95%

5%

About typical

Mental Health

healthier than 41%

8%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 20%

16%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 39%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 76%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 93%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 80%

11%

Disability

healthier than 76%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 82%

5%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 52%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 43%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 50%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 28%

16%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults28.0%25.6–30.6
High blood pressure among adults29.7%27.0–32.6
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.2%9.3–11.1
Current asthma among adults10.9%9.7–12.1
Coronary heart disease among adults5.9%5.2–6.7
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults5.9%4.8–7.0
Depression among adults27.2%24.4–30.2
Diagnosed diabetes among adults8.6%7.5–9.8
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened33.5%30.7–36.4
Obesity among adults26.5%22.7–30.5
Stroke among adults3.1%2.7–3.5
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years10.6%8.6–12.7
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years5.2%3.9–6.9
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure77.2%74.4–79.7
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults75.2%72.4–78.0
Cholesterol screening among adults87.7%85.7–89.5
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years70.3%66.4–73.9
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults74.3%71.6–76.9
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years77.8%71.9–83.0
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults16.4%14.3–18.7
Current cigarette smoking among adults10.7%8.3–13.3
No leisure-time physical activity among adults16.6%13.7–19.8
Short sleep duration among adults24.0%20.6–27.7
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults12.8%10.6–15.2
Frequent mental distress among adults14.9%13.0–16.8
Frequent physical distress among adults11.4%9.8–13.0
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults11.1%9.3–13.1
Any disability among adults24.5%21.3–28.0
Hearing disability among adults7.4%6.6–8.3
Independent living disability among adults5.9%4.9–7.0
Mobility disability among adults9.6%8.1–11.4
Self-care disability among adults2.8%2.4–3.3
Vision disability among adults3.5%3.0–4.0
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)VT median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate4.4%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3647.8% (2.6–16.6%) n=249
Uninsured 18–647.7%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2865.1% (0.5–11.7%) n=249
No HS diploma (25+)8.2%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5054.4% (1.1–10.6%) n=249
Bachelor's or higher (25+)50.6%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50537.6% (23.1–61.5%) n=249
Unemployment rate (16+)4.6%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.5% (0.0–6.9%) n=248
Households without a vehicle2.2%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3222.7% (0.0–9.1%) n=249
Broadband subscription79.6%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32290.2% (79.4–96.9%) n=249
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)20.8%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32228.2% (16.0–37.4%) n=249
Homeownership rate88.4%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32283.7% (67.1–94.3%) n=249
Crowded housing (>1 per room)5.1%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.5% (0.0–4.2%) n=249
Foreign-born population2.2%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5532.4% (0.0–7.3%) n=250
Single-parent households56.9%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08760.6% (46.4–74.0%) n=248
Population 65+17.8%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55323.8% (15.2–32.4%) n=250
Median age44.6 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29246.5 yr (38.1–56.3) n=249
Median household income$85,417$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$79,091 ($59,484–$109,843) n=238
Median home value$280,200$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$281,300 ($200,110–$447,750) n=242
Median gross rent$1,023$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,131 ($858–$1,557) n=190
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)VT median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth83.2 yr ± 1.8378.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30882.0 yr (78.6–85.9) n=250

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.83 years of 83.2, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured