Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

05680

in Wolcott, VermontPopulation 2,003

53.37/ 100

Ranked #11,534 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 36%)

Ranked #181 of 249 Vermont ZIPs (bottom 27%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Broad coverage across health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Fatal road crashes

0 per 100,000 residents per year

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The annual rate of fatal road crashes per 100,000 residents, pooled over a ten-year window.

A rate per resident population. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the rate to be reliable — about 30% of US ZIPs — no value is published rather than an unstable one; those ZIPs are absent from this comparison, not counted as crash-free.

Full methodology ›

Industrial-pollution burden

in the bottom 3.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST19th
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

High cholesterol

30.4%

in the bottom 3.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST10th
US4th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.

Full methodology ›

Tree cover

78.1%

in the top 5.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST62nd
US94th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.

Full methodology ›

Humid extreme heat

12.6 days/year

in the bottom 9.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST29th
US9th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

Diabetes

8.9%

in the bottom 8.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST28th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been diagnosed with diabetes.

Full methodology ›

Binge drinking

17.9%

in the top 20% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US80th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

20 per million

in the bottom 25% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US25th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

62.1%

in the bottom 23% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST2nd
US23rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

The read

Wolcott, Vermont (ZIP 05680), on the composite measure, lands in the top 36% healthiest ZIPs nationally (11,534th) and the bottom 27% of Vermont (181st), based on limited data; treat as directional.

continue reading

The profile cuts both ways, and the readings bear that out: fatal road crashes lies at the national minimum, modeled industrial-pollution burden settles in the bottom 3.4% nationally, and modeled high cholesterol stands in the bottom 3.9% nationally. Modeled tree cover is in the top 5.7% nationally, and humid heat rests in the bottom 9.5% nationally. Modeled extreme heat sits at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs. Modeled loud transportation noise registers at the national minimum, shared with about 22% of ZIPs. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility lands in the top 11.5% nationally, and modeled diabetes resides in the bottom 8.2% nationally. Working the other way, fiber broadband lies at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs.

In everyday language, industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is a plant handling large amounts of hazardous chemicals that must file an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases. Humid heat is a modeled heat-stress measure combining temperature, humidity, sun, and wind to gauge heat on the body outdoors. A healthier neighbor overall sits at ZIP 05650, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 74%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 88%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 72%

11%

Disability

healthier than 69%

7%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

in the top 0.4%

5%

About typical

Healthcare Access

healthier than 57%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 11%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 30%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 23%

8%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 65%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 83%

14%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

in the top 0.00%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 72%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 5%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 4%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 1%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 14%

8%

Disability

healthier than 35%

7%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults29.7%26.5–32.8
High blood pressure among adults30.4%26.8–33.8
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults8.9%8.0–9.9
Current asthma among adults11.7%10.3–13.2
Coronary heart disease among adults6.2%5.4–7.2
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults7.1%5.7–8.8
Depression among adults28.2%24.7–31.9
Diagnosed diabetes among adults8.9%7.5–10.5
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened30.4%27.1–34.0
Obesity among adults30.9%25.6–36.2
Stroke among adults3.3%2.9–3.8
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years12.5%10.0–15.3
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years6.5%4.8–8.6
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure75.3%71.6–78.4
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults72.7%68.7–76.3
Cholesterol screening among adults85.7%83.3–88.1
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years62.1%57.2–66.7
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults64.6%61.1–68.1
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years73.8%66.3–80.2
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults17.9%15.1–21.0
Current cigarette smoking among adults14.4%11.0–18.2
No leisure-time physical activity among adults21.2%17.1–25.9
Short sleep duration among adults30.6%25.8–35.8
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults16.8%13.5–20.4
Frequent mental distress among adults16.5%14.3–19.0
Frequent physical distress among adults13.9%11.7–16.2
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults13.8%11.4–16.5
Any disability among adults29.4%24.9–34.3
Hearing disability among adults7.4%6.4–8.4
Independent living disability among adults7.5%6.1–8.9
Mobility disability among adults12.0%9.7–14.5
Self-care disability among adults3.6%2.9–4.3
Vision disability among adults4.3%3.5–5.1
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)VT median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate7.8%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3647.8% (2.6–16.6%) n=249
Uninsured 18–6410.0%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2865.1% (0.5–11.7%) n=249
No HS diploma (25+)12.8%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5054.4% (1.1–10.6%) n=249
Bachelor's or higher (25+)32.7%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50537.6% (23.1–61.5%) n=249
Unemployment rate (16+)2.6%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.5% (0.0–6.9%) n=248
Households without a vehicle8.4%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3222.7% (0.0–9.1%) n=249
Broadband subscription83.3%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32290.2% (79.4–96.9%) n=249
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)30.1%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32228.2% (16.0–37.4%) n=249
Homeownership rate82.6%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32283.7% (67.1–94.3%) n=249
Crowded housing (>1 per room)2.3%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.5% (0.0–4.2%) n=249
Foreign-born population0.4%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5532.4% (0.0–7.3%) n=250
Single-parent households49.6%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08760.6% (46.4–74.0%) n=248
Population 65+11.7%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55323.8% (15.2–32.4%) n=250
Median age42.6 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29246.5 yr (38.1–56.3) n=249
Median household income$72,917$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$79,091 ($59,484–$109,843) n=238
Median home value$227,700$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$281,300 ($200,110–$447,750) n=242
Median gross rent$1,068$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,131 ($858–$1,557) n=190
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)VT median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth82.5 yr ± 2.0478.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30882.0 yr (78.6–85.9) n=250

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 2.04 years of 82.5, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured