Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

04773

in Saint David, MainePopulation 550

43.57/ 100

Ranked #23,836 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 26%)

Ranked #309 of 408 Maine ZIPs (bottom 24%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Broad coverage across health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Industrial-pollution burden

in the bottom 1.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST6th
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility

28.4 mi

in the top 2.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST98th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest facility that handles enough hazardous chemicals to require an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases.

Full methodology ›

Energy-cost burden

6.1%

in the top 2.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST88th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of household income spent on home energy bills — electricity, gas, and heating fuels.

A modeled share of household income spent on home energy. Estimates that hit the model’s 100% ceiling are suppressed rather than published, because at that point the figure reflects the model’s limit rather than a measured burden.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

10 per million

in the bottom 2.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

Humid extreme heat

5.4 days/year

in the bottom 3.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST10th
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

Arsenic in groundwater

16.7%

in the top 8.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST60th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Homeownership rate

95%

in the top 8.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST89th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes that are owned, rather than rented, by the people living in them.

Full methodology ›

Binge drinking

12.1%

in the bottom 7.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST11th
US7th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

Coronary heart disease

10.2%

in the top 8.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST82nd
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.

Full methodology ›

Lead in tap water

0.00029 ppb

in the bottom 9.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

US10th
Definition & source ›

The lead level at the 90th percentile of tap-water samples reported by the public water systems serving this ZIP, in parts per billion — the EPA requires action above 15 ppb.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

The read

Saint David, Maine (ZIP 04773), overall, ranks in the bottom 26% nationally (23,836th) and the bottom 24% of Maine (309th), based on limited data; treat as directional.

continue reading

Reading across the data, the real pressures come first: modeled energy burden lies in the top 2.7% nationally, arsenic stands in the top 8.6% nationally, and coronary heart disease rests in the top 8.3% nationally. More encouragingly, modeled industrial-pollution burden registers in the bottom 1.8% nationally, distance to a hazardous-chemical facility resides in the top 2.3% nationally, and modeled air-toxics cancer risk settles in the bottom 2.8% nationally. Modeled humid heat is in the bottom 3.4% nationally, and homeownership sits in the top 8.6% nationally. Modeled binge drinking lands in the bottom 7.3% nationally, and lead in tap water lies in the bottom 9.6% nationally.

Defined simply, industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is a plant handling large amounts of hazardous chemicals that must file an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases. Air-toxics cancer risk is a modeled EPA estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air, per million people. ZIP 04772, just across the boundary, comes out healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 99%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 83%

13%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

in the top 0.00%

5%

About typical

Healthcare Access

healthier than 50%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 6%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 6%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 38%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 26%

8%

Disability

healthier than 21%

7%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 97%

14%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

in the top 0.00%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 73%

5%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 56%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 55%

8%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 5%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 6%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 14%

11%

Disability

healthier than 6%

7%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults39.1%35.7–42.3
High blood pressure among adults45.8%42.3–49.4
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.9%9.8–12.0
Current asthma among adults13.6%12.0–15.1
Coronary heart disease among adults10.2%8.9–11.7
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults12.0%9.9–14.4
Depression among adults25.5%22.5–28.6
Diagnosed diabetes among adults16.0%13.9–18.3
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened43.3%39.8–46.6
Obesity among adults41.2%36.3–46.1
Stroke among adults4.9%4.2–5.6
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years15.2%12.8–18.0
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years8.6%6.5–11.1
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure80.5%77.8–83.0
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults83.6%81.0–86.0
Cholesterol screening among adults88.2%86.2–89.9
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years72.0%68.3–75.6
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults56.1%52.7–59.4
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years78.9%73.4–83.9
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults12.1%10.1–14.2
Current cigarette smoking among adults18.9%15.1–22.8
No leisure-time physical activity among adults33.0%28.1–38.1
Short sleep duration among adults37.1%32.8–41.5
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults24.8%21.0–29.1
Frequent mental distress among adults18.0%15.7–20.3
Frequent physical distress among adults18.3%15.7–20.8
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults16.9%14.4–19.5
Any disability among adults39.1%34.5–43.8
Hearing disability among adults10.9%9.5–12.2
Independent living disability among adults10.0%8.4–11.8
Mobility disability among adults20.0%16.8–23.5
Self-care disability among adults5.0%4.2–6.1
Vision disability among adults6.0%5.0–7.0
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults24.8%21.3–28.3
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults14.1%11.0–17.4
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults21.0%16.7–25.4
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults11.5%9.3–13.8
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults8.8%7.3–10.4
Loneliness among adults33.0%29.1–36.9
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults9.0%7.5–10.6
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)ME median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate8.2%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36410.3% (3.2–19.5%) n=416
Uninsured 18–649.8%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2869.8% (3.0–20.9%) n=413
No HS diploma (25+)0.0%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.2% (0.8–11.7%) n=417
Bachelor's or higher (25+)18.6%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50529.4% (14.9–57.3%) n=417
Unemployment rate (16+)9.4%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.1% (0.0–8.3%) n=415
Households without a vehicle5.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.7% (0.0–11.5%) n=416
Broadband subscription82.1%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32289.9% (79.7–97.2%) n=416
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)19.5%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32223.4% (13.9–35.0%) n=416
Homeownership rate95.0%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32284.7% (68.7–95.5%) n=416
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.8% (0.0–3.4%) n=416
Foreign-born population6.9%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5532.1% (0.1–5.9%) n=417
Single-parent households61.8%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08761.5% (48.8–80.6%) n=414
Population 65+25.1%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55324.6% (16.3–42.1%) n=417
Median age46.7 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29249.0 yr (39.3–60.7) n=413
Median household income$68,571$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$68,485 ($50,225–$100,018) n=396
Median home value$140,000$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$246,500 ($130,660–$484,830) n=402
Median gross rent$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,014 ($618–$1,501) n=320
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)ME median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth79.3 yr ± 1.9178.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30879.0 yr (76.1–82.5) n=363

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.91 years of 79.3, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured