Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

03268

in Salisbury, New HampshirePopulation 1,468

58.94/ 100

Ranked #5,641 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 18%)

Ranked #140 of 243 New Hampshire ZIPs (bottom 42%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Mammography

82.8%

in the top 2.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST95th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

Fiber broadband

98.8%

in the top 5.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST98th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The share of homes where fiber-optic internet service is available.

Full methodology ›

Homeownership rate

96.6%

in the top 6.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST88th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes that are owned, rather than rented, by the people living in them.

Full methodology ›

Tree cover

74.9%

in the top 7.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST66th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.

Full methodology ›

Households without a vehicle

9.4%

in the top 16% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US84th
Definition & source ›

The share of households with no vehicle available.

Full methodology ›

Walkability

3.5 intersections/sq mi

in the bottom 20% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST8th
US20th
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a Superfund site

30.8 mi

in the top 27% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST98th
US73rd
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

Unemployment rate

6.0%

in the top 28% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST90th
US72nd
Definition & source ›

The share of the civilian labor force that is unemployed.

Full methodology ›

Home broadband subscription

85.2%

in the bottom 31% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST7th
US31st
Definition & source ›

The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.

Full methodology ›

The read

Salisbury, New Hampshire (ZIP 03268), by its overall standing, sits in the top 18% healthiest ZIPs nationally (5,641st) and the bottom 42% of New Hampshire (140th).

continue reading

The data is generous to this ZIP in several places worth naming: modeled mammography sits in the top 2.6% nationally, fiber broadband settles in the top 5.3% nationally, and homeownership registers in the top 6.8% nationally. Modeled tree cover stands in the top 7.0% nationally. Modeled extreme heat lands at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs. Modeled loud transportation noise is at the national minimum, shared with about 22% of ZIPs. Modeled loneliness resides in the bottom 12.4% nationally, and colon screening rests in the top 12.8% nationally. Household income lies in the top 12.6% nationally. Working the other way, households without a vehicle sits in the top 16% nationally.

Defined in plain terms, extreme heat is a modeled count of days a year reaching a dangerously high temperature, a leading weather hazard. Loud transportation noise is the modeled share of an area exposed to road, rail, and air noise at or above 65 decibels, near conversation volume. The nearest ZIP ranking healthier overall is ZIP 03278, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 65%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 82%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 90%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 87%

11%

Disability

healthier than 71%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 63%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 51%

16%

Mental Health

healthier than 55%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 53%

5%

Nothing measured is holding this score back.

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 74%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 71%

13%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 63%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 51%

21%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 50%

11%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 33%

16%

Mental Health

healthier than 31%

8%

Disability

healthier than 37%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 23%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults30.2%27.3–33.1
High blood pressure among adults33.9%30.7–37.2
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.3%9.3–11.3
Current asthma among adults11.2%10.0–12.7
Coronary heart disease among adults6.6%5.6–7.6
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults7.2%5.9–8.9
Depression among adults23.9%20.9–27.1
Diagnosed diabetes among adults9.9%8.4–11.5
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened34.7%31.5–38.0
Obesity among adults34.3%29.7–39.4
Stroke among adults3.4%2.9–3.9
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years9.1%7.7–10.6
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years6.7%4.8–8.9
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure77.2%74.0–80.0
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults79.8%76.7–82.5
Cholesterol screening among adults88.7%86.6–90.4
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years71.5%68.4–74.5
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults71.8%69.1–74.3
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years82.8%78.6–86.5
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults14.8%12.4–17.2
Current cigarette smoking among adults11.8%9.1–14.7
No leisure-time physical activity among adults20.7%16.9–25.0
Short sleep duration among adults32.5%28.9–36.3
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults15.5%12.7–18.7
Frequent mental distress among adults15.7%13.6–18.0
Frequent physical distress among adults12.6%10.7–14.6
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults12.8%10.6–15.3
Any disability among adults28.6%24.5–33.0
Hearing disability among adults7.8%6.7–8.9
Independent living disability among adults7.2%5.9–8.7
Mobility disability among adults13.1%10.8–15.7
Self-care disability among adults3.3%2.7–4.0
Vision disability among adults4.1%3.4–4.9
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults21.4%18.1–25.0
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults9.6%7.2–12.3
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults7.3%5.3–9.6
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults8.3%6.4–10.3
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults5.9%4.8–7.1
Loneliness among adults28.8%25.0–32.8
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults5.6%4.5–6.8
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NH median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate7.5%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3646.7% (2.0–13.3%) n=243
Uninsured 18–646.6%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2867.1% (2.2–14.5%) n=242
No HS diploma (25+)4.3%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5054.5% (1.3–9.8%) n=243
Bachelor's or higher (25+)37.4%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50538.8% (21.4–60.3%) n=243
Unemployment rate (16+)6.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.8% (0.0–6.0%) n=243
Households without a vehicle9.4%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3222.5% (0.0–8.4%) n=243
Broadband subscription85.2%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32292.9% (85.7–99.0%) n=243
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)19.3%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32227.1% (17.2–36.4%) n=243
Homeownership rate96.6%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32286.0% (62.6–96.9%) n=243
Crowded housing (>1 per room)2.7%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.7% (0.0–3.1%) n=243
Foreign-born population0.5%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5533.1% (0.5–7.1%) n=243
Single-parent households63.0%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08760.9% (46.9–76.5%) n=243
Population 65+25.3%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55322.1% (15.1–37.1%) n=243
Median age51.8 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29247.1 yr (38.4–58.4) n=243
Median household income$111,818$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$98,684 ($67,733–$147,723) n=235
Median home value$363,200$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$371,500 ($252,560–$570,440) n=237
Median gross rent$1,917$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,360 ($1,037–$1,893) n=197
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NH median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth84.0 yr ± 3.0578.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30881.2 yr (78.0–85.7) n=242

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 3.05 years of 84.0, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured