Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

02453

in Waltham, MassachusettsPopulation 31,591

64.99/ 100

Ranked #2,005 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 6.3%)

Ranked #126 of 527 Massachusetts ZIPs (top 24%)

Ranked #112 of 281 Boston-Cambridge-Newton, MA-NH ZIPs (top 40%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

High blood pressure

22.8%

in the bottom 1.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST5th
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.

Full methodology ›

Mammography

84.5%

in the top 0.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST65th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

Obesity

23.7%

in the bottom 3.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST19th
US4th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with obesity, defined as a body-mass index of 30 or higher.

Full methodology ›

Walkability

180 intersections/sq mi

in the top 3.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST89th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

High cholesterol

29.8%

in the bottom 3.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST5th
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.

Full methodology ›

Coronary heart disease

3.8%

in the bottom 2.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST5th
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.

Full methodology ›

Hearing disability

4.2%

in the bottom 2.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST5th
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.

Full methodology ›

Stroke

2.0%

in the bottom 2.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST5th
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.

Full methodology ›

Diabetes

7.0%

in the bottom 2.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST6th
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been diagnosed with diabetes.

Full methodology ›

Mobility disability

8.0%

in the bottom 3.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST8th
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.

Full methodology ›

The read

In overall standing, ZIP 02453, one of several in Waltham, Massachusetts comes out in the top 6.3% healthiest ZIPs nationally (2,005th) and the top 24% of Massachusetts (126th).

continue reading

Both sides of the picture show up plainly in this area's numbers: modeled high blood pressure rests in the bottom 1.9% nationally, mammography lies in the top 0.9% nationally, and obesity sits in the bottom 3.8% nationally. Walkability settles in the top 3.2% nationally, modeled high cholesterol registers in the bottom 3.2% nationally, and modeled coronary heart disease stands in the bottom 2.7% nationally. Modeled hearing disability lands in the bottom 2.6% nationally, and stroke is in the bottom 2.3% nationally. Modeled diabetes resides in the bottom 2.4% nationally, and mobility disability rests in the bottom 3.2% nationally.

Relative to the ZIPs around it, park land runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. The nearest healthier ZIP overall is ZIP 02460, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Boston-Cambridge-Newton, MA-NH metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 97%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 75%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 78%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 85%

11%

Disability

healthier than 92%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 63%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 88%

5%

About typical

Mental Health

healthier than 42%

8%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 32%

14%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 94%

21%

Disability

healthier than 71%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 86%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 49%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 49%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 57%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 41%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 55%

5%

Holding it back

Preventive Care

healthier than 20%

13%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 91%

21%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 86%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 55%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 44%

11%

Disability

healthier than 60%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 58%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 38%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 23%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 29%

8%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

2 of our published findings list this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Above what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 82.4 ± 1.7 years. A median household income of $115,366 predicts 80.6 years — 1.8 years above.

    Ranked #1,095 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

  • Heavy environment, light chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 32.2; chronic-disease standing 97.0 (top 10%) — 65 points apart, heavier on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #15,893 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults17.9%16.4–19.5
High blood pressure among adults22.8%20.8–24.8
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults5.8%5.4–6.3
Current asthma among adults11.2%10.2–12.4
Coronary heart disease among adults3.8%3.4–4.2
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults3.8%3.4–4.3
Depression among adults24.7%22.4–27.2
Diagnosed diabetes among adults7.0%6.2–7.9
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened29.8%27.6–32.2
Obesity among adults23.7%20.6–27.1
Stroke among adults2.0%1.9–2.2
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years8.3%6.9–9.9
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years5.5%4.6–6.4
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure67.3%64.7–69.9
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults76.9%74.3–79.4
Cholesterol screening among adults87.6%86.0–89.1
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years70.9%67.9–73.8
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults71.3%68.8–73.5
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years84.5%80.8–87.8
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults18.4%16.4–20.7
Current cigarette smoking among adults8.9%7.7–10.2
No leisure-time physical activity among adults18.2%16.1–20.7
Short sleep duration among adults32.0%28.8–35.3
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults13.4%12.0–15.0
Frequent mental distress among adults16.5%14.9–18.2
Frequent physical distress among adults9.4%8.4–10.5
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults13.9%12.4–15.5
Any disability among adults23.9%21.5–26.4
Hearing disability among adults4.2%3.8–4.8
Independent living disability among adults6.4%5.7–7.2
Mobility disability among adults8.0%7.1–9.0
Self-care disability among adults2.3%2.1–2.5
Vision disability among adults3.4%3.1–3.8
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults23.1%20.7–25.7
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults11.6%10.1–13.3
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults12.0%10.4–13.8
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults11.1%9.7–12.6
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults7.9%6.9–8.9
Loneliness among adults37.3%34.1–40.5
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults6.2%5.4–7.1
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate9.1%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3646.4% (2.6–16.9%) n=524
Uninsured 18–644.6%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2862.4% (0.0–6.3%) n=525
No HS diploma (25+)6.6%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5054.7% (1.1–15.2%) n=526
Bachelor's or higher (25+)59.5%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50545.7% (23.6–77.5%) n=526
Unemployment rate (16+)3.9%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.4% (1.6–7.9%) n=523
Households without a vehicle9.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.6% (0.4–20.2%) n=522
Broadband subscription92.7%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32294.1% (87.2–98.4%) n=522
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)31.4%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32230.5% (21.2–43.7%) n=522
Homeownership rate43.4%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32279.1% (39.6–93.5%) n=522
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.5%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–3.8%) n=522
Foreign-born population24.2%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5538.7% (1.9–28.4%) n=527
Single-parent households51.0%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08752.5% (40.0–68.7%) n=520
Population 65+13.9%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.4% (12.1–33.8%) n=527
Median age32.7 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.5 yr (34.3–57.2) n=524
Median household income$115,366$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$110,450 ($68,196–$177,335) n=505
Median home value$705,100$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$519,200 ($297,220–$949,670) n=508
Median gross rent$2,115$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,659 ($1,104–$2,452) n=461
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth82.4 yr ± 0.8578.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30881.3 yr (78.1–84.4) n=514

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.85 years of 82.4, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured