Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

02452

in Waltham, MassachusettsPopulation 15,808

60.86/ 100

Ranked #4,225 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 13.2%)

Ranked #256 of 527 Massachusetts ZIPs (top 49%)

Ranked #178 of 281 Boston-Cambridge-Newton, MA-NH ZIPs (bottom 37%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Obesity

23.9%

in the bottom 4.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST21st
US4th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with obesity, defined as a body-mass index of 30 or higher.

Full methodology ›

High blood pressure

25%

in the bottom 2.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST7th
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.

Full methodology ›

Diabetes

7.2%

in the bottom 2.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST6th
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been diagnosed with diabetes.

Full methodology ›

Fatal road crashes

1.3 per 100,000 residents per year

in the bottom 5.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST11th
US5th
Definition & source ›

The annual rate of fatal road crashes per 100,000 residents, pooled over a ten-year window.

A rate per resident population. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the rate to be reliable — about 30% of US ZIPs — no value is published rather than an unstable one; those ZIPs are absent from this comparison, not counted as crash-free.

Full methodology ›

Mammography

82.2%

in the top 3.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST27th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

Coronary heart disease

4.3%

in the bottom 4.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST7th
US5th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.

Full methodology ›

Stroke

2.3%

in the bottom 4.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST10th
US4th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.

Full methodology ›

Mobility disability

8.9%

in the bottom 5.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST15th
US5th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.

Full methodology ›

Hearing disability

5.0%

in the bottom 6.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST13th
US6th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.

Full methodology ›

High cholesterol

31.6%

in the bottom 5.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST8th
US6th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.

Full methodology ›

The read

ZIP 02452, one of several in Waltham, Massachusetts, in overall standing, comes out in the top 13.2% healthiest ZIPs nationally (4,225th) and the top 49% of Massachusetts (256th).

continue reading

A balanced showing across the data, with a few readings each side: modeled obesity stands in the bottom 4.1% nationally, high blood pressure resides in the bottom 2.8% nationally, and diabetes sits in the bottom 2.6% nationally. Fatal road crashes stands in the bottom 5.0% nationally, modeled mammography resides in the top 3.6% nationally, and modeled coronary heart disease sits in the bottom 4.6% nationally. Modeled stroke stands in the bottom 4.3% nationally, and mobility disability resides in the bottom 5.3% nationally. Modeled hearing disability sits in the bottom 6.4% nationally, and high cholesterol stands in the bottom 5.7% nationally.

Set within its surrounding area, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. The closest healthier ZIP overall is ZIP 02421, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Boston-Cambridge-Newton, MA-NH metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 94%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 63%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 71%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 86%

11%

Disability

healthier than 80%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 68%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 76%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 36%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 21%

8%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 90%

21%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 60%

11%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 67%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 65%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 55%

14%

Disability

healthier than 40%

7%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 37%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 17%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 18%

8%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 86%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 63%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 71%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 66%

5%

About typical

Risk Behavior

healthier than 48%

11%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 26%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 19%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 6%

8%

Disability

healthier than 27%

7%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

2 of our published findings list this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Above what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 83.0 ± 1.7 years. A median household income of $118,431 predicts 80.7 years — 2.3 years above.

    Ranked #770 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

  • Heavy environment, light chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 36.1; chronic-disease standing 93.8 (top 10%) — 58 points apart, heavier on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #15,190 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults19.9%18.2–21.6
High blood pressure among adults25.0%22.9–27.3
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults6.9%6.3–7.5
Current asthma among adults11.9%10.7–13.2
Coronary heart disease among adults4.3%3.8–4.8
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults4.4%3.8–5.0
Depression among adults26.1%23.5–28.7
Diagnosed diabetes among adults7.2%6.4–8.1
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened31.6%29.3–34.0
Obesity among adults23.9%20.7–27.3
Stroke among adults2.3%2.0–2.5
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years10.3%8.5–12.4
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years5.1%4.2–6.3
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure68.3%65.9–70.6
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults78.0%75.6–80.3
Cholesterol screening among adults84.5%82.5–86.5
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years73.2%70.2–76.0
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults67.8%65.3–70.3
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years82.2%78.0–85.9
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults16.9%15.0–18.9
Current cigarette smoking among adults9.3%7.9–10.8
No leisure-time physical activity among adults19.9%17.1–22.6
Short sleep duration among adults32.2%28.9–35.6
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults15.1%13.2–17.0
Frequent mental distress among adults18.4%16.4–20.3
Frequent physical distress among adults10.3%9.1–11.5
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults16.6%14.5–18.5
Any disability among adults28.1%25.1–31.0
Hearing disability among adults5.0%4.4–5.6
Independent living disability among adults8.4%7.3–9.5
Mobility disability among adults8.9%7.7–10.1
Self-care disability among adults2.5%2.2–2.8
Vision disability among adults4.1%3.6–4.6
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults23.1%20.5–25.8
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults14.6%12.3–17.0
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults16.5%13.7–19.3
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults11.8%10.0–13.6
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults10.5%8.9–12.0
Loneliness among adults37.9%34.8–41.3
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults7.4%6.2–8.5
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate11.7%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3646.4% (2.6–16.9%) n=524
Uninsured 18–643.7%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2862.4% (0.0–6.3%) n=525
No HS diploma (25+)8.6%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5054.7% (1.1–15.2%) n=526
Bachelor's or higher (25+)53.8%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50545.7% (23.6–77.5%) n=526
Unemployment rate (16+)3.7%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.4% (1.6–7.9%) n=523
Households without a vehicle8.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.6% (0.4–20.2%) n=522
Broadband subscription96.4%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32294.1% (87.2–98.4%) n=522
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)35.5%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32230.5% (21.2–43.7%) n=522
Homeownership rate51.1%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32279.1% (39.6–93.5%) n=522
Crowded housing (>1 per room)5.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–3.8%) n=522
Foreign-born population27.1%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5538.7% (1.9–28.4%) n=527
Single-parent households50.9%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08752.5% (40.0–68.7%) n=520
Population 65+16.2%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.4% (12.1–33.8%) n=527
Median age31.6 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.5 yr (34.3–57.2) n=524
Median household income$118,431$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$110,450 ($68,196–$177,335) n=505
Median home value$808,300$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$519,200 ($297,220–$949,670) n=508
Median gross rent$2,322$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,659 ($1,104–$2,452) n=461
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth83.0 yr ± 0.8678.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30881.3 yr (78.1–84.4) n=514

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.86 years of 83.0, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured