Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

02136

in Hyde Park, MassachusettsPopulation 37,265

57.18/ 100

Ranked #7,101 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 22%)

Ranked #357 of 527 Massachusetts ZIPs (bottom 32%)

Ranked #225 of 281 Boston-Cambridge-Newton, MA-NH ZIPs (bottom 20%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Lead in tap water

23 ppb

in the top 0.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

US99th
Definition & source ›

The lead level at the 90th percentile of tap-water samples reported by the public water systems serving this ZIP, in parts per billion — the EPA requires action above 15 ppb.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Mammography

85.1%

in the top 0.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST76th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a Superfund site

In this ZIP

at the national minimum

Higher is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

Subsidized affordable housing

634 units

in the top 3.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST96th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The number of affordable rental units in this ZIP supported by the federal Low-Income Housing Tax Credit program.

Full methodology ›

Transportation noise

14.8%

in the top 4.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST89th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.

Full methodology ›

Walkability

150 intersections/sq mi

in the top 5.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST85th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

Transit access

5 per 1,000 residents

in the top 5.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST94th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The number of public-transit stops inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Loneliness

39.2%

in the top 5.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report feeling lonely.

Full methodology ›

Park land

23.5%

in the top 6.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST95th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area that is public parkland.

Full methodology ›

Households without a vehicle

16.3%

in the top 6.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST87th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The share of households with no vehicle available.

Full methodology ›

The read

Judged by its overall standing, Hyde Park, Massachusetts (ZIP 02136) sits in the top 22% healthiest ZIPs nationally (7,101st) and the bottom 32% of Massachusetts (357th).

continue reading

An even profile, with readings pulling both ways: modeled mammography registers in the top 0.6% nationally, subsidized affordable housing is in the top 3.2% nationally, and walkability lies in the top 5.0% nationally. Transit registers in the top 5.1% nationally, and park land is in the top 6.0% nationally. Against that, lead in tap water lies in the top 0.5% nationally, and distance to a Superfund site registers at the national minimum. Modeled transportation noise is in the top 4.4% nationally, and loneliness lies in the top 5.7% nationally. Households without a vehicle registers in the top 6.3% nationally.

Placed beside its immediate neighbors, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Put plainly, lead in tap water is the EPA trigger, 15 parts per billion in tap samples, above which a water system must act on lead. Distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. Subsidized affordable housing is the main federal tax-credit program (HUD) funding affordable rental housing, counted as local units it supports. A healthier nearby ZIP overall is ZIP 02021, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Boston-Cambridge-Newton, MA-NH metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 72%

21%

Preventive Care

healthier than 90%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 65%

8%

Disability

healthier than 62%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 75%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 82%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 40%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 52%

11%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 31%

14%

Lifting this score

Mental Health

healthier than 67%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 77%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 74%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 45%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 48%

14%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 22%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 30%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 20%

11%

Disability

healthier than 20%

7%

Lifting this score

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 80%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 73%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 53%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 59%

8%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 24%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 13%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 37%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 9%

11%

Disability

healthier than 11%

7%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults23.3%21.2–25.7
High blood pressure among adults34.1%31.5–37.0
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults6.3%5.7–6.8
Current asthma among adults12.5%11.3–13.9
Coronary heart disease among adults5.6%5.0–6.1
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults5.7%5.1–6.3
Depression among adults20.7%18.5–23.2
Diagnosed diabetes among adults11.9%10.6–13.4
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened35.0%32.2–38.0
Obesity among adults28.2%24.5–32.4
Stroke among adults3.6%3.3–3.9
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years15.4%13.1–18.0
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years6.9%5.9–7.9
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure77.5%75.1–79.9
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults82.1%79.9–84.2
Cholesterol screening among adults90.1%88.9–91.3
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years68.0%64.5–71.4
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults63.6%60.9–66.3
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years85.1%81.1–88.6
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults17.1%15.1–19.4
Current cigarette smoking among adults11.8%10.3–13.3
No leisure-time physical activity among adults26.6%23.6–29.8
Short sleep duration among adults36.8%33.4–40.6
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults19.7%17.7–21.8
Frequent mental distress among adults16.8%15.2–18.5
Frequent physical distress among adults12.7%11.3–14.0
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults14.5%13.1–16.1
Any disability among adults28.2%25.4–31.0
Hearing disability among adults4.9%4.4–5.5
Independent living disability among adults8.5%7.6–9.4
Mobility disability among adults13.8%12.3–15.4
Self-care disability among adults4.2%3.9–4.6
Vision disability among adults5.6%5.1–6.1
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults28.2%25.3–31.4
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults20.3%18.1–22.9
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults23.2%20.7–26.0
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults19.2%17.1–21.6
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults11.8%10.5–13.2
Loneliness among adults39.2%35.6–42.9
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults12.4%11.0–14.1
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate10.0%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3646.4% (2.6–16.9%) n=524
Uninsured 18–645.1%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2862.4% (0.0–6.3%) n=525
No HS diploma (25+)10.7%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5054.7% (1.1–15.2%) n=526
Bachelor's or higher (25+)35.8%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50545.7% (23.6–77.5%) n=526
Unemployment rate (16+)6.3%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.4% (1.6–7.9%) n=523
Households without a vehicle16.3%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.6% (0.4–20.2%) n=522
Broadband subscription91.4%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32294.1% (87.2–98.4%) n=522
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)40.8%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32230.5% (21.2–43.7%) n=522
Homeownership rate53.2%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32279.1% (39.6–93.5%) n=522
Crowded housing (>1 per room)5.2%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–3.8%) n=522
Foreign-born population28.8%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5538.7% (1.9–28.4%) n=527
Single-parent households30.7%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08752.5% (40.0–68.7%) n=520
Population 65+17.6%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.4% (12.1–33.8%) n=527
Median age37.8 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.5 yr (34.3–57.2) n=524
Median household income$96,737$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$110,450 ($68,196–$177,335) n=505
Median home value$578,400$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$519,200 ($297,220–$949,670) n=508
Median gross rent$1,869$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,659 ($1,104–$2,452) n=461
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth80.0 yr ± 0.7878.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30881.3 yr (78.1–84.4) n=514

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.78 years of 80.0, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured