Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

02132

in West Roxbury, MassachusettsPopulation 26,444

67.25/ 100

Ranked #1,213 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 3.8%)

Ranked #76 of 527 Massachusetts ZIPs (top 14.5%)

Ranked #70 of 281 Boston-Cambridge-Newton, MA-NH ZIPs (top 25%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Lead in tap water

23 ppb

in the top 0.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

US99th
Definition & source ›

The lead level at the 90th percentile of tap-water samples reported by the public water systems serving this ZIP, in parts per billion — the EPA requires action above 15 ppb.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Obesity

21.1%

in the bottom 1.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST7th
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with obesity, defined as a body-mass index of 30 or higher.

Full methodology ›

Mammography

85.8%

in the top 0.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST85th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

Walkability

190 intersections/sq mi

in the top 2.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST90th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

Transit access

6.6 per 1,000 residents

in the top 2.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST98th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The number of public-transit stops inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Median household income

$138,724

in the top 5.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST77th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The middle household income in this ZIP — half of households earn more, half earn less — in dollars per year.

Full methodology ›

Short sleep

28.5%

in the bottom 4.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST7th
US4th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.

Full methodology ›

Park land

19.6%

in the top 7.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST89th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area that is public parkland.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a Superfund site

1.2 mi

in the bottom 7.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST13th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

Transportation noise

10.1%

in the top 8.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST78th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.

Full methodology ›

The read

Judged by its overall standing, West Roxbury, Massachusetts (ZIP 02132) sits in the top 3.8% healthiest ZIPs nationally (1,213th) and the top 14.5% of Massachusetts (76th).

continue reading

An even profile, with readings pulling both ways: modeled obesity rests in the bottom 1.4% nationally, modeled mammography settles in the top 0.4% nationally, and walkability lands in the top 2.7% nationally. Transit rests in the top 2.9% nationally, household income settles in the top 5.3% nationally, and modeled short sleep lands in the bottom 4.3% nationally. Park land rests in the top 7.1% nationally. Against that, lead in tap water settles in the top 0.6% nationally, and distance to a Superfund site lands in the bottom 7.9% nationally. Modeled transportation noise rests in the top 8.5% nationally.

Placed beside its immediate neighbors, lead in tap water runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Put plainly, lead in tap water is the EPA trigger, 15 parts per billion in tap samples, above which a water system must act on lead. Distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. Transportation noise is the modeled share of an area exposed to average road, rail, and air noise at or above 55 decibels. A healthier nearby ZIP overall is ZIP 02459, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Boston-Cambridge-Newton, MA-NH metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 86%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 89%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 98%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 88%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 80%

8%

Disability

healthier than 92%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 69%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 74%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 43%

14%

Nothing measured is holding this score back.

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 73%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 77%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 63%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 73%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 67%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 84%

8%

Disability

healthier than 70%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 69%

5%

About typical

Healthcare Access

healthier than 59%

5%

Nothing measured is holding this score back.

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 63%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 66%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 71%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 78%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 78%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 73%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 61%

5%

About typical

Risk Behavior

healthier than 59%

11%

Disability

healthier than 59%

7%

Nothing measured is holding this score back.

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults24.0%21.9–26.4
High blood pressure among adults29.3%26.8–32.1
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.6%8.8–10.5
Current asthma among adults10.8%9.7–12.0
Coronary heart disease among adults5.5%4.9–6.0
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults5.0%4.4–5.6
Depression among adults22.1%19.8–24.7
Diagnosed diabetes among adults8.6%7.6–9.7
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened37.6%34.6–40.7
Obesity among adults21.1%18.0–24.6
Stroke among adults2.8%2.5–3.0
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years8.1%6.8–9.6
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years3.5%3.0–4.1
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure78.0%75.4–80.5
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults82.0%79.9–84.2
Cholesterol screening among adults92.0%91.0–92.9
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years72.2%69.1–75.3
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults75.5%73.4–77.7
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years85.8%82.0–89.2
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults19.4%17.2–21.9
Current cigarette smoking among adults8.5%7.3–9.8
No leisure-time physical activity among adults18.6%16.3–21.0
Short sleep duration among adults28.5%25.4–31.8
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults13.0%11.5–14.6
Frequent mental distress among adults13.8%12.5–15.2
Frequent physical distress among adults10.5%9.4–11.7
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults10.6%9.5–11.9
Any disability among adults22.3%20.0–24.8
Hearing disability among adults5.6%5.0–6.3
Independent living disability among adults5.8%5.2–6.5
Mobility disability among adults10.0%8.8–11.3
Self-care disability among adults2.6%2.3–2.8
Vision disability among adults3.3%3.0–3.7
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults20.2%17.9–22.9
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults8.9%7.7–10.2
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults9.8%8.6–11.2
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults8.6%7.5–9.8
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults5.9%5.2–6.7
Loneliness among adults33.1%29.7–36.7
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults5.6%4.9–6.4
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate4.3%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3646.4% (2.6–16.9%) n=524
Uninsured 18–642.1%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2862.4% (0.0–6.3%) n=525
No HS diploma (25+)4.8%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5054.7% (1.1–15.2%) n=526
Bachelor's or higher (25+)66.8%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50545.7% (23.6–77.5%) n=526
Unemployment rate (16+)3.6%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.4% (1.6–7.9%) n=523
Households without a vehicle10.4%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.6% (0.4–20.2%) n=522
Broadband subscription94.5%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32294.1% (87.2–98.4%) n=522
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)26.0%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32230.5% (21.2–43.7%) n=522
Homeownership rate70.1%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32279.1% (39.6–93.5%) n=522
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.5%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–3.8%) n=522
Foreign-born population18.2%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5538.7% (1.9–28.4%) n=527
Single-parent households51.6%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08752.5% (40.0–68.7%) n=520
Population 65+19.7%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.4% (12.1–33.8%) n=527
Median age43.2 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.5 yr (34.3–57.2) n=524
Median household income$138,724$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$110,450 ($68,196–$177,335) n=505
Median home value$746,100$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$519,200 ($297,220–$949,670) n=508
Median gross rent$2,184$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,659 ($1,104–$2,452) n=461
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth82.1 yr ± 0.6578.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30881.3 yr (78.1–84.4) n=514

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.65 years of 82.1, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured