Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

01970

in Salem, MassachusettsPopulation 44,738

60.47/ 100

Ranked #4,501 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 14.1%)

Ranked #272 of 527 Massachusetts ZIPs (bottom 48%)

Ranked #182 of 281 Boston-Cambridge-Newton, MA-NH ZIPs (bottom 35%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Broad coverage across health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Subsidized affordable housing

1,237 units

in the top 0.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The number of affordable rental units in this ZIP supported by the federal Low-Income Housing Tax Credit program.

Full methodology ›

Mammography

83.9%

in the top 1.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST52nd
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

Mental-health provider access

0.18 per 1,000 residents

in the top 5.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST93rd
US95th
Definition & source ›

The number of mental-health clinics located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Transportation noise

12.8%

in the top 5.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST85th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.

Full methodology ›

Loud transportation noise

2.3%

in the top 5.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US94th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 65 decibels — around the volume of normal conversation.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a Superfund site

1 mi

in the bottom 7.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST12th
US7th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

Households without a vehicle

14.7%

in the top 7.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST85th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The share of households with no vehicle available.

Full methodology ›

Housing-cost burden

42.4%

in the top 7.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST87th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.

Full methodology ›

Homeownership rate

49.6%

in the bottom 8.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST16th
US9th
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes that are owned, rather than rented, by the people living in them.

Full methodology ›

High blood pressure

29.4%

in the bottom 9.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST23rd
US9th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.

Full methodology ›

The read

By the composite health measure, Salem, Massachusetts (ZIP 01970) ranks in the top 14.1% healthiest ZIPs nationally (4,501st) and the bottom 48% of Massachusetts (272nd), based on limited data; treat as directional.

continue reading

The signals balance out across the profile, strengths against concerns: subsidized affordable housing registers in the top 0.9% nationally, and modeled mammography rests in the top 1.4% nationally. Mental-health providers stands in the top 5.1% nationally. Distance to an emergency room lies at the national minimum, shared with about 11% of ZIPs. Set against that, modeled transportation noise lands in the top 5.7% nationally, modeled loud transportation noise sits in the top 5.8% nationally, and distance to a Superfund site is in the bottom 7.4% nationally. Households without a vehicle settles in the top 7.5% nationally, housing-cost burden resides in the top 7.6% nationally, and homeownership registers in the bottom 8.8% nationally.

Read against the ZIPs closest to it, subsidized affordable housing runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. To spell things out, distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. Subsidized affordable housing is the main federal tax-credit program (HUD) funding affordable rental housing, counted as local units it supports. Transportation noise is the modeled share of an area exposed to average road, rail, and air noise at or above 55 decibels. Close by, ZIP 01907, just across the boundary, ranks healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Boston-Cambridge-Newton, MA-NH metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 83%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 74%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 90%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 71%

11%

Disability

healthier than 78%

7%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 95%

5%

Healthcare Access

in the top 0.00%

5%

About typical

Mental Health

healthier than 48%

8%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 23%

14%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 66%

21%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

in the top 0.7%

5%

Healthcare Access

in the top 0.00%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 48%

16%

Mental Health

healthier than 48%

8%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 32%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 29%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 36%

11%

Disability

healthier than 37%

7%

Lifting this score

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

in the top 0.3%

5%

Healthcare Access

in the top 0.00%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 51%

21%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 38%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 32%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 36%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 20%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 35%

8%

Disability

healthier than 21%

7%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Above what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 81.0 ± 1.4 years. A median household income of $85,041 predicts 79.4 years — 1.5 years above.

    Ranked #1,246 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults23.4%21.2–25.4
High blood pressure among adults29.4%26.7–31.8
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults8.0%7.3–8.7
Current asthma among adults12.0%10.8–13.3
Coronary heart disease among adults5.4%4.9–6.0
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults5.8%5.2–6.5
Depression among adults24.0%21.3–26.6
Diagnosed diabetes among adults9.2%8.1–10.2
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened33.1%30.3–35.9
Obesity among adults29.7%25.7–33.7
Stroke among adults2.8%2.6–3.0
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years9.2%7.5–11.1
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years5.5%4.7–6.4
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure74.1%71.3–76.6
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults80.2%77.6–82.6
Cholesterol screening among adults88.6%87.1–90.0
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years70.1%66.5–73.6
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults71.7%69.0–74.4
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years83.9%79.4–87.9
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults16.7%14.5–19.0
Current cigarette smoking among adults11.0%9.6–12.5
No leisure-time physical activity among adults22.4%19.7–25.1
Short sleep duration among adults35.6%31.7–39.8
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults15.9%14.2–17.6
Frequent mental distress among adults16.4%14.7–18.0
Frequent physical distress among adults12.4%11.1–13.6
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults14.3%12.8–15.8
Any disability among adults26.8%24.1–29.4
Hearing disability among adults5.8%5.1–6.3
Independent living disability among adults7.5%6.7–8.2
Mobility disability among adults11.1%9.8–12.3
Self-care disability among adults3.1%2.8–3.4
Vision disability among adults4.2%3.8–4.6
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults22.3%19.8–25.2
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults13.3%11.6–15.2
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults14.7%12.9–16.7
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults11.5%10.1–13.1
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults8.0%7.1–9.0
Loneliness among adults32.3%29.0–35.8
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults7.6%6.6–8.7
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate12.1%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3646.4% (2.6–16.9%) n=524
Uninsured 18–643.8%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2862.4% (0.0–6.3%) n=525
No HS diploma (25+)8.1%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5054.7% (1.1–15.2%) n=526
Bachelor's or higher (25+)47.8%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50545.7% (23.6–77.5%) n=526
Unemployment rate (16+)5.1%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.4% (1.6–7.9%) n=523
Households without a vehicle14.7%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.6% (0.4–20.2%) n=522
Broadband subscription90.4%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32294.1% (87.2–98.4%) n=522
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)42.4%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32230.5% (21.2–43.7%) n=522
Homeownership rate49.6%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32279.1% (39.6–93.5%) n=522
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.6%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–3.8%) n=522
Foreign-born population16.3%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5538.7% (1.9–28.4%) n=527
Single-parent households43.8%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08752.5% (40.0–68.7%) n=520
Population 65+17.1%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.4% (12.1–33.8%) n=527
Median age39.3 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.5 yr (34.3–57.2) n=524
Median household income$85,041$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$110,450 ($68,196–$177,335) n=505
Median home value$542,900$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$519,200 ($297,220–$949,670) n=508
Median gross rent$1,836$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,659 ($1,104–$2,452) n=461
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth81.0 yr ± 0.7178.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30881.3 yr (78.1–84.4) n=514

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.71 years of 81.0, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured