Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

01602

in Worcester, MassachusettsPopulation 27,092

55.96/ 100

Ranked #8,323 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 26%)

Ranked #390 of 527 Massachusetts ZIPs (bottom 26%)

Ranked #57 of 112 Worcester, MA-CT ZIPs (bottom 49%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Mammography

84.5%

in the top 0.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST65th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

Fatal road crashes

2.6 per 100,000 residents per year

in the bottom 8.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST24th
US9th
Definition & source ›

The annual rate of fatal road crashes per 100,000 residents, pooled over a ten-year window.

A rate per resident population. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the rate to be reliable — about 30% of US ZIPs — no value is published rather than an unstable one; those ZIPs are absent from this comparison, not counted as crash-free.

Full methodology ›

Mental-health provider access

0.12 per 1,000 residents

in the top 9.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST85th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The number of mental-health clinics located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Radon

2.7 pCi/L

in the top 16% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US84th
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

Uninsured (under 65)

5.2%

in the bottom 7.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST81st
US8th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 18–64 with no current health-insurance coverage.

Full methodology ›

Expected annual disaster loss

$0

in the top 32% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US68th
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

The read

ZIP 01602, one of several in Worcester, Massachusetts, by its overall standing, sits in the top 26% healthiest ZIPs nationally (8,323rd) and the bottom 26% of Massachusetts (390th).

continue reading

Both sides of the picture show up plainly in this area's numbers: modeled mammography is in the top 0.9% nationally, fatal road crashes resides in the bottom 8.9% nationally, and mental-health providers rests in the top 9.0% nationally. Modeled extreme heat lies at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs. Subsidized affordable housing sits in the top 10.7% nationally. Distance to a community health center settles at the national minimum, shared with about 23% of ZIPs. Walkability registers in the top 11.9% nationally. Distance to a nursing home stands at the national minimum, shared with about 27% of ZIPs. Modeled hearing disability lands in the bottom 13.2% nationally. By contrast, households without a vehicle is in the top 13.6% nationally.

Held up against its neighbors, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Defined in plain terms, extreme heat is a modeled count of days a year reaching a dangerously high temperature, a leading weather hazard. Subsidized affordable housing is the main federal tax-credit program (HUD) funding affordable rental housing, counted as local units it supports. Distance to a community health center is a federally funded (HRSA) community health center serving everyone regardless of ability to pay. The nearest ZIP ranking healthier overall is ZIP 01612, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Worcester, MA-CT metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 73%

21%

Preventive Care

healthier than 91%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 69%

11%

Disability

healthier than 76%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 72%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 90%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 38%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 15%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 27%

8%

Lifting this score

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 73%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 89%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 45%

21%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 20%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 19%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 31%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 32%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 24%

8%

Disability

healthier than 35%

7%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 66%

21%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 88%

5%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 42%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 58%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 45%

8%

Disability

healthier than 42%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 55%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 18%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 16%

14%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Heavy environment, light chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 15.4; chronic-disease standing 72.7 — 57 points apart, heavier on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #15,137 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults25.9%23.7–28.2
High blood pressure among adults32.2%29.6–34.9
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults8.2%7.5–9.0
Current asthma among adults12.5%11.2–13.8
Coronary heart disease among adults5.7%5.2–6.3
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults6.0%5.3–6.7
Depression among adults25.9%23.2–28.8
Diagnosed diabetes among adults10.1%9.0–11.4
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened34.2%31.4–37.1
Obesity among adults31.9%28.0–36.2
Stroke among adults3.0%2.8–3.2
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years11.8%9.6–14.0
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years5.2%4.4–6.1
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure75.2%72.7–77.7
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults81.5%79.1–83.8
Cholesterol screening among adults89.1%87.6–90.4
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years68.0%64.3–71.3
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults69.8%67.0–72.3
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years84.5%79.9–88.1
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults17.5%15.3–20.0
Current cigarette smoking among adults11.2%9.8–12.7
No leisure-time physical activity among adults23.1%20.4–25.9
Short sleep duration among adults34.3%30.4–37.9
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults16.9%15.1–18.7
Frequent mental distress among adults17.5%15.8–19.3
Frequent physical distress among adults13.0%11.7–14.4
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults14.5%13.1–16.1
Any disability among adults28.0%25.3–30.9
Hearing disability among adults5.7%5.1–6.4
Independent living disability among adults7.6%6.8–8.5
Mobility disability among adults11.8%10.5–13.3
Self-care disability among adults3.2%2.9–3.5
Vision disability among adults4.3%3.9–4.6
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults24.1%21.5–26.8
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults13.4%11.7–15.2
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults15.3%13.4–17.2
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults11.3%9.9–12.8
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults8.1%7.2–9.1
Loneliness among adults35.0%31.7–38.3
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults7.7%6.8–8.7
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate13.5%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3646.4% (2.6–16.9%) n=524
Uninsured 18–643.8%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2862.4% (0.0–6.3%) n=525
No HS diploma (25+)9.7%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5054.7% (1.1–15.2%) n=526
Bachelor's or higher (25+)44.9%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50545.7% (23.6–77.5%) n=526
Unemployment rate (16+)6.1%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.4% (1.6–7.9%) n=523
Households without a vehicle10.6%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.6% (0.4–20.2%) n=522
Broadband subscription93.2%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32294.1% (87.2–98.4%) n=522
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)36.0%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32230.5% (21.2–43.7%) n=522
Homeownership rate58.9%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32279.1% (39.6–93.5%) n=522
Crowded housing (>1 per room)2.6%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–3.8%) n=522
Foreign-born population23.8%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5538.7% (1.9–28.4%) n=527
Single-parent households49.1%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08752.5% (40.0–68.7%) n=520
Population 65+15.8%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.4% (12.1–33.8%) n=527
Median age39.3 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.5 yr (34.3–57.2) n=524
Median household income$91,764$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$110,450 ($68,196–$177,335) n=505
Median home value$417,300$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$519,200 ($297,220–$949,670) n=508
Median gross rent$1,590$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,659 ($1,104–$2,452) n=461
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth80.1 yr ± 0.5978.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30881.3 yr (78.1–84.4) n=514

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.59 years of 80.1, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured