Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

01452

in Hubbardston, MassachusettsPopulation 4,371

56.16/ 100

Ranked #8,113 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 25%)

Ranked #382 of 527 Massachusetts ZIPs (bottom 28%)

Ranked #52 of 112 Worcester, MA-CT ZIPs (top 46%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Mammography

84.1%

in the top 1.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST56th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

Median household income

$123,500

in the top 8.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST64th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The middle household income in this ZIP — half of households earn more, half earn less — in dollars per year.

Full methodology ›

Homeownership rate

93.5%

in the top 10.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST90th
US89th
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes that are owned, rather than rented, by the people living in them.

Full methodology ›

Uninsured (under 65)

4.0%

in the bottom 2.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST58th
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 18–64 with no current health-insurance coverage.

Full methodology ›

Radon

2.4 pCi/L

in the top 21% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US79th
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

The read

Hubbardston, Massachusetts (ZIP 01452), overall, ranks in the top 25% healthiest ZIPs nationally (8,113th) and the bottom 28% of Massachusetts (382nd).

continue reading

Taken together, the data gives a genuinely mixed reading: modeled mammography sits in the top 1.3% nationally, and household income lands in the top 8.6% nationally. Modeled extreme heat lies at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs. Homeownership stands in the top 10.9% nationally, and modeled uninsured rests in the bottom 2.4% nationally. Modeled tree cover registers in the top 13.5% nationally, and poverty resides in the bottom 16% nationally. Modeled tooth loss settles in the bottom 13.0% nationally, and humid heat is in the bottom 16% nationally. On the other side, fiber broadband sits at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs.

Measured against the nearby ZIPs, park land runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Defined simply, extreme heat is a modeled count of days a year reaching a dangerously high temperature, a leading weather hazard. Humid heat is a modeled heat-stress measure combining temperature, humidity, sun, and wind to gauge heat on the body outdoors. ZIP 01468, just across the boundary, comes out healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Worcester, MA-CT metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Preventive Care

healthier than 96%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 62%

11%

Disability

healthier than 75%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 67%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 69%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 60%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 59%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 46%

14%

Holding it back

Mental Health

healthier than 23%

8%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 66%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 64%

5%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 49%

13%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 54%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 24%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 33%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 25%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 22%

8%

Disability

healthier than 34%

7%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 75%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 61%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 49%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 57%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 49%

11%

Disability

healthier than 41%

7%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 20%

21%

Mental Health

healthier than 36%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 32%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults30.0%27.3–32.8
High blood pressure among adults34.7%31.6–37.8
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.8%8.8–10.9
Current asthma among adults12.6%11.4–14.1
Coronary heart disease among adults6.4%5.6–7.4
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults7.0%5.7–8.6
Depression among adults27.0%24.2–30.0
Diagnosed diabetes among adults10.3%8.9–12.0
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened37.3%34.4–40.4
Obesity among adults32.7%28.4–37.1
Stroke among adults3.2%2.8–3.7
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years8.0%6.4–9.6
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years4.0%2.9–5.2
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure76.7%73.9–79.6
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults82.0%79.5–84.4
Cholesterol screening among adults90.7%88.8–92.1
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years70.5%66.8–73.8
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults73.0%70.3–75.4
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years84.1%79.3–87.9
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults18.3%16.0–20.9
Current cigarette smoking among adults13.2%10.2–16.3
No leisure-time physical activity among adults22.3%18.4–26.4
Short sleep duration among adults33.6%29.7–37.2
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults16.7%13.8–20.0
Frequent mental distress among adults17.3%15.2–19.5
Frequent physical distress among adults14.1%12.0–16.3
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults14.1%12.0–16.6
Any disability among adults28.3%24.3–32.5
Hearing disability among adults6.3%5.5–7.3
Independent living disability among adults7.4%6.1–8.7
Mobility disability among adults12.5%10.4–15.0
Self-care disability among adults3.3%2.7–3.9
Vision disability among adults3.8%3.2–4.5
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults23.3%20.0–26.6
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults10.5%8.1–13.5
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults12.5%9.4–16.2
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults9.1%7.3–11.2
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults6.6%5.4–8.0
Loneliness among adults33.3%29.6–37.1
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults6.3%5.2–7.5
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate4.3%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3646.4% (2.6–16.9%) n=524
Uninsured 18–641.3%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2862.4% (0.0–6.3%) n=525
No HS diploma (25+)4.8%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5054.7% (1.1–15.2%) n=526
Bachelor's or higher (25+)33.7%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50545.7% (23.6–77.5%) n=526
Unemployment rate (16+)2.8%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.4% (1.6–7.9%) n=523
Households without a vehicle1.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.6% (0.4–20.2%) n=522
Broadband subscription95.1%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32294.1% (87.2–98.4%) n=522
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)21.9%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32230.5% (21.2–43.7%) n=522
Homeownership rate93.5%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32279.1% (39.6–93.5%) n=522
Crowded housing (>1 per room)2.3%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–3.8%) n=522
Foreign-born population1.8%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5538.7% (1.9–28.4%) n=527
Single-parent households60.5%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08752.5% (40.0–68.7%) n=520
Population 65+20.5%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.4% (12.1–33.8%) n=527
Median age46.8 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.5 yr (34.3–57.2) n=524
Median household income$123,500$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$110,450 ($68,196–$177,335) n=505
Median home value$371,600$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$519,200 ($297,220–$949,670) n=508
Median gross rent$953$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,659 ($1,104–$2,452) n=461
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth80.6 yr ± 2.4378.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30881.3 yr (78.1–84.4) n=514

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 2.43 years of 80.6, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured