Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

01031

in Gilbertville, MassachusettsPopulation 1,676

52.20/ 100

Ranked #13,179 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 41%)

Ranked #446 of 527 Massachusetts ZIPs (bottom 15%)

Ranked #80 of 112 Worcester, MA-CT ZIPs (bottom 29%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Broad coverage across health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Fatal road crashes

0 per 100,000 residents per year

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The annual rate of fatal road crashes per 100,000 residents, pooled over a ten-year window.

A rate per resident population. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the rate to be reliable — about 30% of US ZIPs — no value is published rather than an unstable one; those ZIPs are absent from this comparison, not counted as crash-free.

Full methodology ›

Mammography

83.1%

in the top 2.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST38th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

Transportation noise

9.5%

in the top 9.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST76th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.

Full methodology ›

Arsenic in groundwater

15.4%

in the top 9.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US90th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Expected annual disaster loss

$0

in the bottom 9.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST7th
US10th
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a community health center

14.8 mi

in the top 12.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US88th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest federally funded community health center, which serves patients regardless of ability to pay.

Full methodology ›

Uninsured (under 65)

4.1%

in the bottom 2.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST62nd
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 18–64 with no current health-insurance coverage.

Full methodology ›

Natural-disaster risk

in the bottom 13.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST9th
US14th
Definition & source ›

This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.

Full methodology ›

Distance to an emergency room

10.8 mi

in the top 22% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US78th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Medicare-certified hospital with an emergency room.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a nursing home

5.4 mi

in the top 29% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US71st
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Medicare- or Medicaid-certified nursing home.

Full methodology ›

The read

By the composite measure, Gilbertville, Massachusetts (ZIP 01031) sits in the top 41% healthiest ZIPs nationally (13,179th) and the bottom 15% of Massachusetts (446th), based on limited data; treat as directional.

continue reading

The profile cuts both ways, and the readings bear that out: fatal road crashes settles at the national minimum, modeled mammography stands in the top 2.3% nationally, and modeled expected annual loss is in the bottom 9.6% nationally. Modeled extreme heat rests at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs. Modeled uninsured sits in the bottom 2.7% nationally, and disaster risk registers in the bottom 13.7% nationally. Working the other way, modeled transportation noise lands in the top 9.4% nationally, and arsenic resides in the top 9.6% nationally. Homeownership lies in the bottom 11.2% nationally, and distance to a community health center settles in the top 12.5% nationally.

In plain language, arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. Disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. ZIP 01037, just across the boundary, ranks healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Worcester, MA-CT metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Preventive Care

healthier than 94%

13%

Disability

healthier than 68%

7%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 95%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 49%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 57%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 56%

11%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 18%

16%

Mental Health

healthier than 18%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 11%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 75%

14%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

in the top 0.6%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 15%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 11%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 38%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 22%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 16%

8%

Disability

healthier than 27%

7%

Healthcare Access

in the bottom 0.2%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 87%

14%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

in the top 0.00%

5%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 49%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 43%

11%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 5%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 11%

16%

Mental Health

healthier than 25%

8%

Disability

healthier than 31%

7%

Healthcare Access

in the bottom 0.00%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults30.6%27.8–33.2
High blood pressure among adults35.4%32.2–38.4
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.0%9.0–11.0
Current asthma among adults12.9%11.6–14.4
Coronary heart disease among adults6.7%5.7–7.7
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults7.4%6.0–8.9
Depression among adults27.5%24.6–30.5
Diagnosed diabetes among adults10.7%9.1–12.2
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened37.2%34.2–40.2
Obesity among adults33.2%28.8–37.6
Stroke among adults3.4%2.9–4.0
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years15.8%13.0–18.7
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years4.1%3.1–5.5
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure77.0%74.1–79.6
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults82.1%79.6–84.4
Cholesterol screening among adults90.5%88.7–92.0
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years70.0%66.2–73.2
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults68.0%65.0–70.7
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years83.1%78.0–86.9
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults18.0%15.7–20.5
Current cigarette smoking among adults13.6%10.7–16.7
No leisure-time physical activity among adults23.4%19.5–27.5
Short sleep duration among adults34.6%30.6–38.3
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults17.5%14.5–20.6
Frequent mental distress among adults17.9%15.7–20.2
Frequent physical distress among adults14.5%12.5–16.6
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults14.8%12.5–17.3
Any disability among adults29.7%25.8–33.6
Hearing disability among adults6.6%5.7–7.6
Independent living disability among adults7.9%6.6–9.4
Mobility disability among adults13.3%11.0–15.7
Self-care disability among adults3.4%2.8–4.1
Vision disability among adults4.1%3.4–4.8
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults23.5%20.3–26.9
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults11.2%8.8–14.1
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults13.6%10.5–17.1
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults9.6%7.7–11.6
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults7.0%5.8–8.3
Loneliness among adults33.9%30.3–37.7
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults6.7%5.6–7.9
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate14.7%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3646.4% (2.6–16.9%) n=524
Uninsured 18–642.5%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2862.4% (0.0–6.3%) n=525
No HS diploma (25+)7.8%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5054.7% (1.1–15.2%) n=526
Bachelor's or higher (25+)24.0%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50545.7% (23.6–77.5%) n=526
Unemployment rate (16+)3.3%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.4% (1.6–7.9%) n=523
Households without a vehicle6.6%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.6% (0.4–20.2%) n=522
Broadband subscription94.1%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32294.1% (87.2–98.4%) n=522
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)36.9%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32230.5% (21.2–43.7%) n=522
Homeownership rate53.8%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32279.1% (39.6–93.5%) n=522
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.7%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–3.8%) n=522
Foreign-born population3.8%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5538.7% (1.9–28.4%) n=527
Single-parent households31.0%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08752.5% (40.0–68.7%) n=520
Population 65+13.4%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.4% (12.1–33.8%) n=527
Median age35.8 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.5 yr (34.3–57.2) n=524
Median household income$60,517$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$110,450 ($68,196–$177,335) n=505
Median home value$245,600$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$519,200 ($297,220–$949,670) n=508
Median gross rent$1,175$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,659 ($1,104–$2,452) n=461
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth82.0 yr ± 1.3978.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30881.3 yr (78.1–84.4) n=514

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.39 years of 82.0, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured