ZIP code
01009
in Bondsville, MassachusettsPopulation 804
48.03/ 100
Ranked #18,887 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 41%)
Ranked #488 of 527 Massachusetts ZIPs (bottom 7.5%)
Ranked #27 of 38 Springfield, MA ZIPs (bottom 29%)
Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.
What defines this ZIP
Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.
Housing-cost burden
45.6%
in the top 5.1% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST92ndUS95thDefinition & source ›
The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.
Full methodology ›Expected annual disaster loss
$0
in the bottom 7.3% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST4thUS7thDefinition & source ›
FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.
Full methodology ›Natural-disaster risk
in the bottom 10.5% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST4thUS10thDefinition & source ›
This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.
Full methodology ›Uninsured (under 65)
4.9%
in the bottom 5.8% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST78thUS6thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults aged 18–64 with no current health-insurance coverage.
Full methodology ›Colon-cancer screening
60.1%
in the bottom 14.7% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST4thUS15thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.
Full methodology ›Energy-cost burden
4.6%
in the top 15.0% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST94thUS85thDefinition & source ›
The modeled share of household income spent on home energy bills — electricity, gas, and heating fuels.
A modeled share of household income spent on home energy. Estimates that hit the model’s 100% ceiling are suppressed rather than published, because at that point the figure reflects the model’s limit rather than a measured burden.
Full methodology ›Distance to a community health center
8.9 mi
in the top 23% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST95thUS77thDefinition & source ›
The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest federally funded community health center, which serves patients regardless of ability to pay.
Full methodology ›Mammography
78%
in the top 26% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST5thUS74thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.
Full methodology ›The read
On balance, and by the composite measure, Bondsville, Massachusetts (ZIP 01009) ranks in the bottom 41% nationally (18,887th) and the bottom 7.5% of Massachusetts (488th).
Strengths and concerns sit side by side across the measures here: modeled expected annual loss is in the bottom 7.3% nationally. Households without a vehicle stands at the national minimum, shared with about 16% of ZIPs. Modeled extreme heat settles at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs. Modeled disaster risk lies in the bottom 10.5% nationally. Modeled loud transportation noise resides at the national minimum, shared with about 22% of ZIPs. Home broadband subscription lands in the top 11.4% nationally. On the other hand, housing-cost burden registers in the top 5.1% nationally. Fiber broadband sits at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs. Outer-floodplain exposure rests in the top 12.7% nationally, and modeled pfas is in the top 13.0% nationally.
Compared with the ZIPs it borders, park land runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In plainer terms, expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. Disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. Pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. For a healthier nearby ZIP overall, look to ZIP 01007, just across the boundary.
What’s driving this score
Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Springfield, MA metro area.
Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.
Lifting this score
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 61%
21%
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 62%
14%
Preventive Care
healthier than 64%
13%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 81%
5%
About typical
Disability
healthier than 57%
7%
Holding it back
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 11%
16%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 31%
11%
Mental Health
healthier than 5%
8%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 28%
5%
Lifting this score
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 82%
14%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 86%
5%
Holding it back
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 26%
21%
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 8%
16%
Preventive Care
healthier than 15%
13%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 12%
11%
Mental Health
healthier than 3%
8%
Disability
healthier than 17%
7%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 3%
5%
Lifting this score
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 80%
21%
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 94%
14%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 77%
5%
About typical
Disability
healthier than 51%
7%
Holding it back
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 20%
16%
Preventive Care
healthier than 29%
13%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 29%
11%
Mental Health
healthier than 6%
8%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 3%
5%
“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›
Nearby & similar ZIPs
Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.
Nearby
01007
Massachusettsshares a border
Score 61.80
Closest healthier
01069
Massachusettsshares a border
Score 49.66
Similar health profile
15622
Pennsylvania99% similar profile
Score 51.12
How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured
Evidence
Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.
Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Arthritis among adults | 29.3% | 26.6–32.3 |
| High blood pressure among adults | 32.1% | 28.9–35.4 |
| Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults | 8.7% | 7.8–9.6 |
| Current asthma among adults | 13.6% | 12.1–15.2 |
| Coronary heart disease among adults | 6.0% | 5.2–6.9 |
| Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults | 7.5% | 6.0–9.1 |
| Depression among adults | 30.2% | 26.8–33.8 |
| Diagnosed diabetes among adults | 9.9% | 8.5–11.5 |
| High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened | 34.2% | 30.8–37.5 |
| Obesity among adults | 33.8% | 28.9–38.9 |
| Stroke among adults | 3.2% | 2.7–3.6 |
| All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years | 10.8% | 8.7–13.1 |
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years | 4.9% | 3.6–6.5 |
| Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure | 74.3% | 71.1–77.2 |
| Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults | 79.6% | 76.5–82.4 |
| Cholesterol screening among adults | 88.1% | 85.9–90.1 |
| Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years | 60.1% | 55.8–64.2 |
| Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults | 69.2% | 66.3–72.0 |
| Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years | 78.0% | 72.1–83.0 |
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Binge drinking among adults | 18.6% | 15.8–21.5 |
| Current cigarette smoking among adults | 15.8% | 12.5–19.3 |
| No leisure-time physical activity among adults | 25.2% | 21.0–29.9 |
| Short sleep duration among adults | 36.6% | 32.3–40.9 |
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults | 19.3% | 16.1–23.0 |
| Frequent mental distress among adults | 20.2% | 17.6–22.9 |
| Frequent physical distress among adults | 15.2% | 13.2–17.7 |
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Cognitive disability among adults | 16.8% | 14.2–19.6 |
| Any disability among adults | 32.4% | 28.2–37.1 |
| Hearing disability among adults | 6.3% | 5.5–7.3 |
| Independent living disability among adults | 9.0% | 7.5–10.6 |
| Mobility disability among adults | 14.0% | 11.6–16.8 |
| Self-care disability among adults | 3.7% | 3.0–4.4 |
| Vision disability among adults | 4.4% | 3.7–5.2 |
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Lack of social and emotional support among adults | 27.3% | 23.6–31.2 |
| Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 13.8% | 10.7–17.4 |
| Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults | 18.0% | 14.0–22.4 |
| Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 12.5% | 10.2–15.2 |
| Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults | 8.5% | 7.0–10.1 |
| Loneliness among adults | 36.5% | 32.5–40.9 |
| Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults | 8.5% | 7.0–10.1 |
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | MA median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Poverty rate | 5.7% | 10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,364 | 6.4% (2.6–16.9%) n=524 |
| Uninsured 18–64 | 0.0% | 9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,286 | 2.4% (0.0–6.3%) n=525 |
| No HS diploma (25+) | 6.4% | 7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,505 | 4.7% (1.1–15.2%) n=526 |
| Bachelor's or higher (25+) | 32.1% | 23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,505 | 45.7% (23.6–77.5%) n=526 |
| Unemployment rate (16+) | 7.2% | 3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,274 | 4.4% (1.6–7.9%) n=523 |
| Households without a vehicle | 0.0% | 3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,322 | 4.6% (0.4–20.2%) n=522 |
| Broadband subscription | 96.7% | 89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,322 | 94.1% (87.2–98.4%) n=522 |
| Housing cost burden (≥30% income) | 45.6% | 23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,322 | 30.5% (21.2–43.7%) n=522 |
| Homeownership rate | 59.3% | 78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,322 | 79.1% (39.6–93.5%) n=522 |
| Crowded housing (>1 per room) | 0.0% | 1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,322 | 1.1% (0.0–3.8%) n=522 |
| Foreign-born population | 0.0% | 2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,553 | 8.7% (1.9–28.4%) n=527 |
| Single-parent households | 25.0% | 53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,087 | 52.5% (40.0–68.7%) n=520 |
| Population 65+ | 15.5% | 19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,553 | 19.4% (12.1–33.8%) n=527 |
| Median age | 31.3 yr | 42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,292 | 43.5 yr (34.3–57.2) n=524 |
| Median household income | $72,841 | $72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318 | $110,450 ($68,196–$177,335) n=505 |
| Median home value | $274,200 | $222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049 | $519,200 ($297,220–$949,670) n=508 |
| Median gross rent | $1,286 | $1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670 | $1,659 ($1,104–$2,452) n=461 |
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | MA median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Life expectancy at birth | 81.0 yr ± 2.14 | 78.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,308 | 81.3 yr (78.1–84.4) n=514 |
About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 2.14 years of 81.0, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.
More ZIPs to explore ▾More ZIPs to explore ▴
How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured