Archived release. This page is frozen at the data release below and will not change. Current data is at the latest ranking.
Florence, SC metro ZIP codes, ranked by the ZipVitals Score
Every Florence, SC metro ZIP code (ZCTA) with a ZipVitals Score, ranked within the metro — descriptive of documented conditions, never a verdict on the people who live there.
Data release 202618 ZIP codes in this ranking
- 10,45129501in Florence · 48,673 residents54.19
- 14,11129541in Effingham · 9,326 residents51.50
- 14,18229505in Florence · 23,895 residents51.47
- 15,73929101in McBee · 2,497 residents50.37
- 19,57429161in Timmonsville · 9,688 residents47.48
- 21,65929550in Hartsville · 29,924 residents45.70
- 23,44129530in Coward · 2,641 residents43.97
- 23,99329591in Scranton · 4,639 residents43.42
- 24,07029560in Lake City · 12,277 residents43.33
- 24,55429069in Lamar · 4,647 residents42.79
- 25,11229114in Olanta · 1,786 residents42.13
- 25,44029532in Darlington · 19,857 residents41.74
- 25,86729555in Johnsonville · 5,972 residents41.22
- 26,15729079in Lydia · 58 residents40.85
- 26,68629540in Darlington · 4,080 residents40.11
- 27,55529583in Pamplico · 4,994 residents38.77
- 28,29829506in Florence · 20,777 residents37.47
- 30,21729593in Society Hill · 1,692 residents32.35
How this ranking works
Ranks are each ZIP code’s position in the full national ZipVitals Score ranking, so the numbers jump — this metro holds 18 of the tens of thousands of scored US ZIP codes — and they never change with the sort direction; the rank a ZIP carries here is the rank it carries everywhere on this site. A ZIP whose data is too thin to score is held out entirely rather than filled from county or metro figures.
Cite this ranking
The permalink /metro/florence-sc/ranking/2026-75251315 resolves to this exact release and never changes; an always-latest version lives at /metro/florence-sc/ranking. Free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 with attribution.
A high score describes favorable documented conditions — never a claim about residents. Where ZIP codes score low, that pattern reflects structural conditions — investment, environment, and access — far more than the choices of the people who live there.