Skip to main content
ZipVitals

Colorado Springs, CO metro ZIP codes, ranked by the ZipVitals Score

Every Colorado Springs, CO metro ZIP code (ZCTA) with a ZipVitals Score, ranked within the metro — descriptive of documented conditions, never a verdict on the people who live there.

Data release 202649 ZIP codes in this ranking

49 of 49 shown
#ZIP code · locatorScore
  1. 1,52280924in Colorado Springs · 19,619 residents66.28
  2. 1,65580921in Colorado Springs · 26,551 residents65.91
  3. 1,70480914in Colorado Springs · 504 residents65.78
  4. 2,28580908in Colorado Springs · 25,486 residents64.33
  5. 2,56380919in Colorado Springs · 27,787 residents63.82
  6. 2,58080132in Monument · 30,073 residents63.79
  7. 2,69780920in Colorado Springs · 36,923 residents63.53
  8. 2,72980913in Colorado Springs · 6,586 residents63.46
  9. 3,22680927in Colorado Springs · 8,036 residents62.50
  10. 3,59480938in Colorado Springs · 1,664 residents61.85
  11. 3,80880923in Colorado Springs · 31,772 residents61.49
  12. 4,18080863in Woodland Park · 12,329 residents60.92
  13. 4,63180809in Cascade · 1,138 residents60.31
  14. 4,73580819in Green Mountain Falls · 650 residents60.18
  15. 4,75680922in Colorado Springs · 30,453 residents60.14
  16. 4,82980926in Colorado Springs · 1,561 residents60.04
  17. 4,83480133in Palmer Lake · 2,425 residents60.04
  18. 5,14280831in Peyton · 33,912 residents59.61
  19. 5,21080829in Manitou Springs · 5,312 residents59.50
  20. 5,43680106in Elbert · 4,455 residents59.21
  21. 5,87380906in Colorado Springs · 37,502 residents58.63
  22. 6,17580951in Colorado Springs · 5,219 residents58.28
  23. 6,64980814in Divide · 4,599 residents57.70
  24. 6,84480925in Colorado Springs · 17,273 residents57.45
  25. 6,90980904in Colorado Springs · 21,158 residents57.38
  26. 7,00880918in Colorado Springs · 50,005 residents57.27
  27. 7,49780816in Florissant · 6,251 residents56.76
  28. 8,64780917in Colorado Springs · 30,398 residents55.68
  29. 9,04780827in Lake George · 808 residents55.34
  30. 9,49580930in Colorado Springs · 1,882 residents54.96
  31. 10,24580929in Colorado Springs · 155 residents54.36
  32. 10,38580907in Colorado Springs · 27,815 residents54.24
  33. 11,11680903in Colorado Springs · 16,491 residents53.68
  34. 11,53180813in Cripple Creek · 1,817 residents53.37
  35. 12,34280817in Fountain · 31,241 residents52.82
  36. 13,37980860in Victor · 654 residents52.06
  37. 13,70080832in Ramah · 1,019 residents51.80
  38. 14,05980911in Colorado Springs · 33,027 residents51.54
  39. 14,24380909in Colorado Springs · 35,486 residents51.42
  40. 14,34380808in Calhan · 6,521 residents51.36
  41. 14,86080905in Colorado Springs · 16,672 residents50.99
  42. 15,40680902in Colorado Springs · 11,951 residents50.61
  43. 16,03480928in Fountain · 798 residents50.15
  44. 16,18480915in Colorado Springs · 23,884 residents50.05
  45. 20,05380840in Usaf Academy · 6,727 residents47.09
  46. 20,21380916in Colorado Springs · 41,104 residents46.96
  47. 20,47580910in Colorado Springs · 31,368 residents46.74
  48. 21,65380833in Rush · 1,240 residents45.70
  49. 23,28380864in Yoder · 1,505 residents44.14

Don’t see a ZIP code you expected? Not every ZIP carries a Score — 1 of this metro's 50 don’t have enough measured data across the nine health domains, and PO-box-only ZIPs aren’t mapped areas. Any ZIP’s own page explains its standing. Look up any ZIP code →

How this ranking works

Ranks are each ZIP code’s position in the full national ZipVitals Score ranking, so the numbers jump — this metro holds 49 of the tens of thousands of scored US ZIP codes — and they never change with the sort direction; the rank a ZIP carries here is the rank it carries everywhere on this site. A ZIP whose data is too thin to score is held out entirely rather than filled from county or metro figures.

Cite this ranking

The permalink /metro/colorado-springs-co/ranking/2026-28662750 resolves to this exact release and never changes; this page always shows the latest. Free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 with attribution.

A high score describes favorable documented conditions — never a claim about residents. Where ZIP codes score low, that pattern reflects structural conditions — investment, environment, and access — far more than the choices of the people who live there.