How the Chambersburg, PA metro's ZIP codes measure up on health
The ZipVitals Score across the Chambersburg, PA metro area — built one ZIP code at a time, then rolled up by resident population.
Data release 202626 of 27 ZIP codes scored · 0.15M residents represented
Score snapshot
People & national context
The Chambersburg, PA metro's ZIP codes, ranked
Highest-scoring
Top 26 of 26- 7,54017214in Blue Ridge Summit · 1,143 residents56.71
- 9,66717263in State Line · 896 residents54.82
- 11,20117222in Fayetteville · 10,550 residents53.62
- 11,69217217in Concord · 182 residents53.26
- 12,23417225in Greencastle · 20,347 residents52.90
- 13,62617254in Scotland · 362 residents51.87
- 14,24217202in Chambersburg · 33,566 residents51.42
- 15,22117236in Mercersburg · 8,845 residents50.73
- 16,07517251in Roxbury · 70 residents50.12
- 17,39717268in Waynesboro · 29,362 residents49.19
- 18,38817247in Quincy · 629 residents48.42
- 18,71017244in Orrstown · 2,263 residents48.18
- 18,98417250in Rouzerville · 0 residents47.95
- 19,20317201in Chambersburg · 27,554 residents47.78
- 19,45817210in Amberson · 242 residents47.59
- 19,68617262in Spring Run · 1,048 residents47.38
- 19,72217237in Mont Alto · 1,759 residents47.35
- 19,83317220in Dry Run · 347 residents47.27
- 20,75417219in Doylesburg · 484 residents46.51
- 21,62717235in Marion · 622 residents45.72
- 21,63917221in Fannettsburg · 458 residents45.71
- 21,79817246in Pleasant Hall · 542 residents45.58
- 22,38417224in Fort Loudon · 1,603 residents45.02
- 24,16917265in Upperstrasburg · 300 residents43.24
- 24,43017271in Willow Hill · 527 residents42.94
- 24,93217252in Saint Thomas · 4,038 residents42.36
Lowest-scoring
Bottom 26 of 26- 24,93217252in Saint Thomas · 4,038 residents42.36
- 24,43017271in Willow Hill · 527 residents42.94
- 24,16917265in Upperstrasburg · 300 residents43.24
- 22,38417224in Fort Loudon · 1,603 residents45.02
- 21,79817246in Pleasant Hall · 542 residents45.58
- 21,63917221in Fannettsburg · 458 residents45.71
- 21,62717235in Marion · 622 residents45.72
- 20,75417219in Doylesburg · 484 residents46.51
- 19,83317220in Dry Run · 347 residents47.27
- 19,72217237in Mont Alto · 1,759 residents47.35
- 19,68617262in Spring Run · 1,048 residents47.38
- 19,45817210in Amberson · 242 residents47.59
- 19,20317201in Chambersburg · 27,554 residents47.78
- 18,98417250in Rouzerville · 0 residents47.95
- 18,71017244in Orrstown · 2,263 residents48.18
- 18,38817247in Quincy · 629 residents48.42
- 17,39717268in Waynesboro · 29,362 residents49.19
- 16,07517251in Roxbury · 70 residents50.12
- 15,22117236in Mercersburg · 8,845 residents50.73
- 14,24217202in Chambersburg · 33,566 residents51.42
- 13,62617254in Scotland · 362 residents51.87
- 12,23417225in Greencastle · 20,347 residents52.90
- 11,69217217in Concord · 182 residents53.26
- 11,20117222in Fayetteville · 10,550 residents53.62
- 9,66717263in State Line · 896 residents54.82
- 7,54017214in Blue Ridge Summit · 1,143 residents56.71
What the distribution shows
Across the Chambersburg, PA metro’s 27 ZIP codes, the ZipVitals Score spans a wide range. 26 of them carry enough measured coverage across all nine health domains to enter the population-weighted composite above; the rest are held out rather than filled from a coarser geography.
The Chambersburg, PA metro has no in-metro comparison group: too few of its ZIP codes carry measured data across all nine scoring domains for the others to be placed against them, so the domain-by-domain breakdown that other metro pages carry is not available here. Every one of its ZIP codes still carries its own Score and its national standing.
Assembled from the same ZIP-level data as every per-ZIP page. Read the full method →
Why this matters
The ZipVitals Score combines nine domains of health — from chronic disease and preventive care to environmental hazard, social need, and healthcare access — into one 0–100 index for each ZIP code, computed the same way everywhere from public federal and academic data. The Chambersburg, PA figures on this page are population-weighted rollups of those per-ZIP scores, so they describe the metro's residents rather than a coarser geography relabeled as the metro.
A high score describes favorable documented conditions; it is not a claim about individual residents, and it does not capture everything that shapes a community's health. Where a ZIP code scores low, that pattern reflects structural conditions — investment, environment, and access — far more than the choices of the people who live there.