Skip to main content
ZipVitals

Insights & Rankings Compare

Compare ZIP codes side by side

Line up 2–5 ZIP codes and read the ZipVitals Score, both ranks, and every scoring domain against the same national scale. Descriptive of documented conditions — never a verdict on the people who live there.

Comparing99683Trapper Creek, AK99841Tenakee Springs, AK
2–5 ZIPs · 2 selected
ZipVitals Score and its national and state ranks, compared across 2 ZIP codes. Higher is healthier. The nine scoring domains follow, one table each.
Metric
ZipVitals Score48.41 Leads47.67
National rank#18,405of 32,066 US ZIPs Leads#19,365of 32,066 US ZIPs
State rank#56of 211 AK ZIPs#64of 211 AK ZIPs
Metro rank#18of 27 ZIPs in its metro areaNot in a metro area

ZipVitals ScoreComposite of 9 scoring domainsNational rank, State rank and Metro rankAmong ZIPs with a computed score

Metro areas 99683: Anchorage, AK · 99841: not in a metro area.

Where these ZIPs differ, domain by domain

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score. Each one is placed on the same national scale, and the domains where these ZIPs are furthest apart come first. Higher is healthier in every one.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Every ranking, bar and gap below is measured against the same national group. Where a ZIP’s line also mentions its state or its metro area, that figure is measured against a different group — its own — so it is context for that one ZIP and never a comparison between them.

Furthest apart first

all 2 ZIPs can be placed on these 8 domains
Disability7% of the score 99683 leads · 14-point gap
99683Trapper Creekhealthier than 34% · no comparison group in Alaska, no metro comparison group1 of 2
99841Tenakee Springshealthier than 20% · no comparison group in Alaska2 of 2
Preventive Care13% of the score 99841 leads · 11-point gap
99841Tenakee Springshealthier than 33% · no comparison group in Alaska1 of 2
99683Trapper Creekhealthier than 22% · no comparison group in Alaska, no metro comparison group2 of 2
Social Need / SDOH16% of the score 99683 leads · 8-point gap
99683Trapper Creekhealthier than 21% · no comparison group in Alaska, no metro comparison group1 of 2
99841Tenakee Springshealthier than 13% · no comparison group in Alaska2 of 2
Mental Health8% of the score 99841 leads · 7-point gap
99841Tenakee Springshealthier than 95% · no comparison group in Alaska1 of 2
99683Trapper Creekhealthier than 88% · no comparison group in Alaska, no metro comparison group2 of 2
Chronic Disease Burden21% of the score 99683 leads · 6-point gap
99683Trapper Creekhealthier than 16% · no comparison group in Alaska, no metro comparison group1 of 2
99841Tenakee Springshealthier than 10% · no comparison group in Alaska2 of 2
Risk Behavior11% of the score 99841 leads · 4-point gap
99841Tenakee Springshealthier than 77% · no comparison group in Alaska1 of 2
99683Trapper Creekhealthier than 73% · no comparison group in Alaska, no metro comparison group2 of 2
Healthcare Access5% of the score 99683 leads · 2-point gap
99683Trapper Creekhealthier than 8% · no comparison group in Alaska, no metro comparison group1 of 2
99841Tenakee Springshealthier than 6% · no comparison group in Alaska2 of 2
Environmental Hazard14% of the scoretied — no single leader
99683Trapper CreekPartialin the top 0.01% · no comparison group in Alaska, no metro comparison group=1 of 2
99841Tenakee SpringsPartialin the top 0.00% · no comparison group in Alaska=1 of 2

Not every ZIP can be placed here

no leader and no gap — ordered by weight instead
Climate / Disaster Risk5% of the scoreno leader — 99683 and 99841 cannot be placed here
99683Trapper Creeknot measured in this ZIP at all — left out of its score rather than estimated
99841Tenakee Springsnot measured in this ZIP at all — left out of its score rather than estimated

“Of the score” is the domain’s weight in the ZipVitals Score — a property of the score itself, the same on every ZIP. Where a ZIP has no measurement for a domain, that domain drops out of its score and the remaining weights scale up, so its own mix differs slightly from the weights shown here; each ZIP’s own page carries its exact shares. Not every ZIP sits in a metro area — those show a state figure only. A gap is the distance between the highest and lowest of these ZIPs on that domain’s national scale. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain.

Data release 2026 · higher is healthier on every row. How the ZipVitals Score is calculated →

The State rank and Metro rank rows show no “Leads” marker: each ZIP is ranked against the ZIPs in its own state and the ZIPs in its own metro area, so those ranks are not ordered against one another.

Share this comparison

This comparison has its own permalink and an auto-generated preview card — the image that unfurls when you paste the link into a message, post, or story.

ZipVitalsZipVitals Score · compare

Trapper Creek vs. Tenakee Springs

Trapper Creek 99683 · AKLEADS48.41
Tenakee Springs 99841 · AK47.67

Data release 2026 · public federal and academic sources · higher is healthier

Preview of the auto-generated share card · ZipVitals Score, 0–100