Insights & Rankings Compare

Compare ZIP codes side by side

Line up 2–5 ZIP codes and read the ZipVitals Score, both ranks, and every scoring domain against the same national scale. Descriptive of documented conditions — never a verdict on the people who live there.

Comparing92382Running Springs, CA15561Sipesville, PA2–5 ZIPs · 2 selected

ZipVitals Score and its national and state ranks, compared across 2 ZIP codes. Higher is healthier. The nine scoring domains follow, one table each.
Metric	Running Springs92382 · CA	Sipesville15561 · PA
ZipVitals ScoreComposite of 9 scoring domains	54.41	55.85 Leads
National rankAmong ZIPs with a computed score	#10,179of 32,066 US ZIPs	#8,444of 32,066 US ZIPs Leads
State rankAmong ZIPs with a computed score	#807of 1,719 CA ZIPs	#403of 1,748 PA ZIPs
Metro rankAmong ZIPs with a computed score	#46of 153 ZIPs in its metro area	Not in a metro area

ZipVitals Score and its national and state ranks, compared across 2 ZIP codes. Higher is healthier. The nine scoring domains follow, one table each.
Metric	Running Springs92382 · CA	Sipesville15561 · PA
ZipVitals Score	54.41	55.85 Leads
National rank	#10,179of 32,066 US ZIPs	#8,444of 32,066 US ZIPs Leads
State rank	#807of 1,719 CA ZIPs	#403of 1,748 PA ZIPs
Metro rank	#46of 153 ZIPs in its metro area	Not in a metro area

ZipVitals Score — Composite of 9 scoring domainsNational rank, State rank and Metro rank — Among ZIPs with a computed score

Metro areas — 92382: Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, CA · 15561: not in a metro area.

Where these ZIPs differ, domain by domain

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score. Each one is placed on the same national scale, and the domains where these ZIPs are furthest apart come first. Higher is healthier in every one.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Every ranking, bar and gap below is measured against the same national group. Where a ZIP’s line also mentions its state or its metro area, that figure is measured against a different group — its own — so it is context for that one ZIP and never a comparison between them.

Furthest apart first

all 2 ZIPs can be placed on these 5 domains

Social Need / SDOH16% of the score 92382 leads · 27-point gap
92382Running Springs		healthier than 56% · 55% in California, 74% in its metro area	1 of 2
15561Sipesville		healthier than 29% · no comparison group in Pennsylvania	2 of 2

Preventive Care13% of the score 15561 leads · 15-point gap
15561SipesvillePartial		healthier than 56% · no comparison group in Pennsylvania	1 of 2
92382Running Springs		healthier than 41% · 62% in California, 80% in its metro area	2 of 2

Environmental Hazard14% of the score 15561 leads · 9-point gap
15561Sipesville		healthier than 79% · no comparison group in Pennsylvania	1 of 2
92382Running Springs		healthier than 70% · 83% in California, 51% in its metro area	2 of 2

Climate / Disaster Risk5% of the score 92382 leads · 3-point gap
92382Running Springs		healthier than 96% · 93% in California, 96% in its metro area	1 of 2
15561Sipesville		healthier than 93% · no comparison group in Pennsylvania	2 of 2

Healthcare Access5% of the score 15561 leads · 3-point gap
15561Sipesville		healthier than 35% · no comparison group in Pennsylvania	1 of 2
92382Running Springs		healthier than 32% · 20% in California, 15% in its metro area	2 of 2

Not every ZIP can be placed here

no leader and no gap — ordered by weight instead

Chronic Disease Burden21% of the scoreno leader — 15561 cannot be placed here
92382Running Springs		healthier than 61% · 27% in California, 38% in its metro area	1 of 1
15561Sipesville	not placed — too little of this domain is measured here to compare reliably, though it still counts toward this ZIP’s score

Risk Behavior11% of the scoreno leader — 15561 cannot be placed here
92382Running Springs		healthier than 73% · 50% in California, 74% in its metro area	1 of 1
15561Sipesville	not placed — too little of this domain is measured here to compare reliably, though it still counts toward this ZIP’s score

Mental Health8% of the scoreno leader — 15561 cannot be placed here
92382Running Springs		healthier than 48% · 39% in California, 48% in its metro area	1 of 1
15561Sipesville	not measured in this ZIP at all — left out of its score rather than estimated

Disability7% of the scoreno leader — 15561 cannot be placed here
92382Running Springs		healthier than 55% · 52% in California, 70% in its metro area	1 of 1
15561Sipesville	not measured in this ZIP at all — left out of its score rather than estimated

“Of the score” is the domain’s weight in the ZipVitals Score — a property of the score itself, the same on every ZIP. Where a ZIP has no measurement for a domain, that domain drops out of its score and the remaining weights scale up, so its own mix differs slightly from the weights shown here; each ZIP’s own page carries its exact shares. Not every ZIP sits in a metro area — those show a state figure only. A gap is the distance between the highest and lowest of these ZIPs on that domain’s national scale. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain.

Data release 2026 · higher is healthier on every row. How the ZipVitals Score is calculated →

The State rank and Metro rank rows show no “Leads” marker: each ZIP is ranked against the ZIPs in its own state and the ZIPs in its own metro area, so those ranks are not ordered against one another.

Share this comparison

This comparison has its own permalink and an auto-generated preview card — the image that unfurls when you paste the link into a message, post, or story.

ZipVitalsZipVitals Score · compare

Sipesville vs. Running Springs

Sipesville 15561 · PALEADS55.85

Running Springs 92382 · CA54.41

Data release 2026 · public federal and academic sources · higher is healthier

Preview of the auto-generated share card · ZipVitals Score, 0–100